Immigrants from China vs Peruvian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Peruvian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Peruvians
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
POVERTY
85.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Peruvian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,001,635 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Peruvian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.14% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 40.8% |
| Range | 23.5% | 40.7% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 12.4% |
| Median | 10.8% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Peruvians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Russia (11.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Sri Lankan (11.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Argentinean (11.7%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Immigrants from Western Europe (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Israel (11.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
| French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |