Immigrants from China vs South African Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
South African
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
South Africans
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs South African Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.97%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | South African |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 54.5% |
| Range | 23.5% | 53.2% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.7% |
| Median | 10.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and South Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Russia (11.7%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
| French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |