Immigrants from England vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Czechoslovakian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Czechoslovakians
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,846,172 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 0.40%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 44.4% | 23.0% |
| Range | 42.8% | 21.9% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 9.4% |
| Median | 9.0% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Czechoslovakians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |