Tohono O'odham vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Czechoslovakian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Czechoslovakians
20.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,710,760 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.703 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 154.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 10.9% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 75.6% | 23.0% |
| Range | 64.7% | 21.9% |
| Mean | 33.2% | 9.4% |
| Median | 28.2% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.5% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (20.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 8.5%), Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 9.0%), Pima (18.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 16.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |