Immigrants from Fiji vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Fiji
Chickasaw
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
71.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,754,712 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 20.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 8.9% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 38.6% |
| Range | 12.2% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 18.1% |
| Median | 12.9% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |