Seminole vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Seminole
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Seminole
Chickasaw
16.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,292,292 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 6.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 32.8% | 38.6% |
| Range | 26.6% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 19.4% | 18.1% |
| Median | 18.6% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are African (16.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |