Immigrants from India vs Bolivian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Bolivian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from India
Bolivians
16.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Bolivian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,520,068 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,445,495 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 6.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from India | Bolivian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 35.8% | 62.7% |
| Range | 33.8% | 61.1% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 19.6% |
| Median | 14.4% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India and Bolivians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 1.7%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |