Immigrants from Lithuania vs Bolivian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Bolivian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Bolivians
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Bolivian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,892,262 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,445,495 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 0.76%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Bolivian |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 30.7% | 62.7% |
| Range | 26.6% | 61.1% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 19.6% |
| Median | 14.9% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Bolivians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |