Immigrants from Indonesia vs Soviet Union Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Soviet Union
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Soviet Union
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Soviet Union Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,706,539 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 0.67% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 45.9% | 26.3% |
| Range | 45.2% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 9.6% |
| Median | 10.7% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Soviet Union by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |