Immigrants from Thailand vs Osage Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Osage
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Osage
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Osage Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,919 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Osage |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 44.1% | 31.5% |
| Range | 42.3% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 17.6% | 14.9% |
| Median | 16.4% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Osage by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |