Immigrants from Thailand vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Chippewa
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 15.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 44.1% | 78.4% |
| Range | 42.3% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 17.6% | 25.6% |
| Median | 16.4% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |