Immigrants from Venezuela vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,684,556 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 21.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Venezuela	Chickasaw
Minimum	0.69%	3.8%
Maximum	40.3%	100.0%
Range	39.6%	96.2%
Mean	14.3%	26.8%
Median	14.8%	21.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.8%	17.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.3%	31.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.5%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.2%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.1%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Venezuela by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Venezuela are Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Oceania	68.4 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Colombia	67.8 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	67.3 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
South Americans	67.2 /100 \| #166	Good 16.1%
Uruguayans	64.7 /100 \| #167	Good 16.2%
Yugoslavians	64.4 /100 \| #168	Good 16.2%
Costa Ricans	64.2 /100 \| #169	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	64.2 /100 \| #170	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	64.0 /100 \| #171	Good 16.2%
Afghans	62.3 /100 \| #172	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| South America	55.1 /100 \| #173	Average 16.4%
Ethiopians	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 16.5%
Lebanese	45.4 /100 \| #175	Average 16.6%
Hungarians	45.1 /100 \| #176	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	44.1 /100 \| #177	Average 16.6%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%