Immigrants from Venezuela vs South American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,684,556 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,506,880 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 3.5%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Venezuela	South American Indian
Minimum	0.69%	2.7%
Maximum	40.3%	100.0%
Range	39.6%	97.3%
Mean	14.3%	26.4%
Median	14.8%	17.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.8%	11.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.3%	34.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.5%	22.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.2%	23.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.1%	22.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Venezuela and South American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Venezuela are Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from South America (16.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Morocco (16.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Arab (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uruguay (16.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Scotch-Irish (16.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Portugal (16.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Yugoslavians	64.4 /100 \| #168	Good 16.2%
Costa Ricans	64.2 /100 \| #169	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	64.2 /100 \| #170	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	64.0 /100 \| #171	Good 16.2%
Afghans	62.3 /100 \| #172	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| South America	55.1 /100 \| #173	Average 16.4%
Ethiopians	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 16.5%
Lebanese	45.4 /100 \| #175	Average 16.6%
Hungarians	45.1 /100 \| #176	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	44.1 /100 \| #177	Average 16.6%
Whites/Caucasians	43.6 /100 \| #178	Average 16.6%
Hawaiians	43.4 /100 \| #179	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Syria	43.3 /100 \| #180	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Iraq	43.2 /100 \| #181	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	43.1 /100 \| #182	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Portugal	42.5 /100 \| #183	Average 16.6%
Scotch-Irish	39.6 /100 \| #184	Fair 16.7%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	35.6 /100 \| #185	Fair 16.7%
South American Indians	35.0 /100 \| #186	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	34.6 /100 \| #187	Fair 16.8%
Arabs	34.5 /100 \| #188	Fair 16.8%