Jamaican vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Celtics
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,369,042 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 5.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jamaican | Celtic |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.6% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 20.9% | 33.1% |
| Median | 21.2% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Icelander (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
| Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |