Paraguayan vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Celtics
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,675,073 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 17.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Paraguayan | Celtic |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.3% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 20.7% | 33.1% |
| Median | 18.3% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Immigrants from Jordan (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Laotian (19.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |