Latvian vs Costa Rican Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Costa Rican
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Costa Ricans
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Costa Rican Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,586,429 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 32.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 27.6% |
| Range | 26.1% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 6.0% |
| Median | 3.8% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |