Latvian vs Shoshone Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Shoshone
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Shoshone
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Shoshone Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,505,445 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 56.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Shoshone |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 50.0% |
| Range | 26.1% | 49.4% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 7.9% |
| Median | 3.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Senegalese (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Senegal (6.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Congo (6.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |