Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Bolivia Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Immigrants from Bolivia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Immigrants from Bolivia
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Bolivia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,648,044 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,712,653 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Immigrants from Bolivia |
Minimum | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 19.5% | 33.0% |
Range | 17.9% | 30.6% |
Mean | 7.5% | 9.4% |
Median | 6.8% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Bolivia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |