Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 10.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 23.0% |
| Range | 16.3% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 8.4% |
| Median | 6.1% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |