Northern European vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty
COMPARE
Northern European
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Northern Europeans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Northern European vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,718,489 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Northern European | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 49.1% | 23.0% |
Range | 47.9% | 22.5% |
Mean | 15.3% | 8.4% |
Median | 10.6% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Northern Europeans and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Denmark (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |