Osage vs Mexican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Osage
Mexican
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Osage
Mexicans
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Mexican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,930,969 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 20.9%, a difference of 12.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Mexican |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 11.4% |
| Maximum | 67.2% | 54.6% |
| Range | 60.5% | 43.2% |
| Mean | 21.1% | 23.5% |
| Median | 19.5% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Mexicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Inupiat (20.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from West Indies (20.7%, a difference of 0.59%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (20.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |