Ottawa vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ottawa
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ottawa
Chinese
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
54.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,836,436 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 42.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ottawa | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 17.1% |
| Range | 10.0% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 4.2% |
| Median | 4.8% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ottawa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Bermudan (5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
| Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
| Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |