Bolivian vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Chinese
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,808,216 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 25.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.69% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 17.1% |
Range | 28.0% | 16.7% |
Mean | 5.3% | 4.2% |
Median | 4.2% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 4.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (4.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and South African (4.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Basques | 98.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 98.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Portuguese | 98.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |