Palestinian vs Slavic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Palestinian
Slavic
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Palestinians
Slavs
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Slavic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,678,574 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,968,300 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 2.0%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 40.9% | 85.0% |
Range | 39.1% | 83.5% |
Mean | 16.5% | 23.0% |
Median | 13.6% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.5% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Slavs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Icelander (15.4%, a difference of 0.41%), New Zealander (15.3%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Vietnam (15.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and Welsh (15.3%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 88.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.2% |
Albanians | 88.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.3% |
Peruvians | 87.2 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.3% |
Welsh | 87.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.3% |
New Zealanders | 86.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.3% |
Slavs | 84.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.4% |
Icelanders | 82.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.4% |