Polish vs Slavic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Polish
Slavic
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Poles
Slavs
14.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Slavic Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,911,563 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,968,300 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 9.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Slavic |
Minimum | 0.49% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 64.3% | 85.0% |
Range | 63.8% | 83.5% |
Mean | 16.3% | 23.0% |
Median | 13.1% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 19.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Poles by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Israel (14.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Tsimshian (14.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Tsimshian | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Icelander (15.4%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Peru (15.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and Slovak (15.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Native Hawaiians | 88.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.2% |
Albanians | 88.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.3% |
Peruvians | 87.2 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.3% |
Welsh | 87.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.3% |
New Zealanders | 86.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.3% |
Slavs | 84.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.4% |
Icelanders | 82.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.5% |
Slovaks | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 80.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 80.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.5% |