Panamanian vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Panamanian
Osage
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Panamanians
Osage
17.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
8.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,653,612 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 5.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Osage |
Minimum | 4.8% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 90.0% | 67.2% |
Range | 85.2% | 60.5% |
Mean | 22.3% | 21.1% |
Median | 17.9% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants (17.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Hmong (17.5%, a difference of 0.59%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.90%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |