Panamanian vs Ugandan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Panamanian
Ugandan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Panamanians
Ugandans
17.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
8.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
17.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Ugandan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,653,612 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,523,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Ugandan |
Minimum | 4.8% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 90.0% | 51.6% |
Range | 85.2% | 49.5% |
Mean | 22.3% | 17.1% |
Median | 17.9% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Ugandans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants (17.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Hmong (17.5%, a difference of 0.59%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |