Pima vs Scottish Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Pima
Scottish
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Pima
Scottish
29.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Scottish Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,516,106 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 29.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,294,508 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.746 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 93.6%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Scottish |
| Minimum | 13.1% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 86.9% | 94.4% |
| Mean | 39.2% | 37.1% |
| Median | 34.2% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.1% | 53.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.6% | 38.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 31.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 31.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Yuman (28.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Norway (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |