Pima vs Yuman Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Pima
Yuman
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Pima
Yuman
29.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Yuman Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,516,106 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 29.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,623,362 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 28.9%, a difference of 0.26%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Yuman |
| Minimum | 13.1% | 5.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 86.9% | 94.7% |
| Mean | 39.2% | 40.6% |
| Median | 34.2% | 33.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.1% | 56.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.6% | 38.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 27.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 26.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Yuman by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 6.8%), Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and Tohono O'odham (31.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.46%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.4%), Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and Tohono O'odham (31.7%, a difference of 9.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |