Turkish vs Latvian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Turkish
Latvian
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Turks
Latvians
19.5%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Latvian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,666,868 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,394,017 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 0.11%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Latvian |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 46.5% | 66.7% |
| Range | 43.9% | 66.0% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 21.5% |
| Median | 16.9% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.7% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Latvians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Soviet Union (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Russian (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Canada (19.5%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Slovak (19.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from England (19.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (19.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Cambodians | 94.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.6 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 94.0 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.7 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 93.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Slovaks | 92.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | England | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 92.9 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Latvians | 92.7 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Jamaicans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Turks | 92.1 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 92.1 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Soviet Union | 92.0 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Russians | 91.5 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Austrians | 90.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 19.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 88.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 85.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 19.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 85.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 19.7% |
| Panamanians | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 19.7% |