Zimbabwean vs Egyptian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Egyptian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Egyptians
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Egyptian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,705,416 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Egyptian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 18.8% | 34.6% |
| Range | 17.7% | 33.4% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 9.6% |
| Median | 8.3% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Egyptians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), English (10.3%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from North America (10.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Irish (10.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |