Zimbabwean vs Swiss Male Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Swiss
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Swiss
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,423,995 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.070%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 18.8% | 47.0% |
Range | 17.7% | 45.9% |
Mean | 8.1% | 10.2% |
Median | 8.3% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 11.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Swiss by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |