Apache Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Apache Married-Couple Family Poverty
9.0%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,238,952 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 9.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.22% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Apache and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Apache influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Apache simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Apache by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 5.4%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and Crow (9.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Apache Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.084% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 99.5% | 52.5% |
| Range | 99.5% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 38.1% | 17.8% |
| Median | 14.9% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.9% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 82.0% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 39.5% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 39.0% | 12.0% |
Correlation Details
| Apache Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.084% | 223,971,508 | 5.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 4,708,275 | 6.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 861,925 | 6.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 294,556 | 7.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 158,633 | 7.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 43,974 | 8.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 27,112 | 8.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 11,079 | 8.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 27,301 | 7.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 22,097 | 12.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.27% | 29,303 | 10.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 8,390 | 11.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.24% | 3,207 | 21.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 2,482 | 38.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 64 | 12.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 8,287 | 5.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.35% | 414 | 6.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 5,911 | 5.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.33% | 225 | 4.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.90% | 2,563 | 5.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 1,479 | 18.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.43% | 1,065 | 9.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.45% | 618 | 18.2% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.01% | 147 | 23.1% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.59% | 133 | 23.1% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.32% | 7,067 | 18.9% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.86% | 4,405 | 28.2% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.68% | 3,969 | 19.6% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.63% | 980 | 10.3% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.87% | 11,840 | 22.0% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.65% | 3,049 | 35.8% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.14% | 1,621 | 44.0% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.48% | 4,284 | 28.4% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.27% | 2,925 | 52.5% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.87% | 1,403 | 33.8% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.19% | 2,173 | 23.0% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.31% | 2,497 | 31.4% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.39% | 1,552 | 29.4% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 99.54% | 439 | 25.0% |