South African Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
South African Married-Couple Family Poverty
4.6%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,779,474 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933 and weighted average of 4.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.94% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of South Africans and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of South Africans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if South Africans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Turkey (4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (4.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Croatia (4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (4.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants from Iran | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Icelanders | 99.0 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants from Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 98.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 98.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Basques | 98.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 98.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South African Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.053% | 1.00% |
| Maximum | 33.5% | 35.3% |
| Range | 33.5% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 6.2% |
| Median | 2.4% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.4% |
Correlation Details
| South African Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.053% | 173,485,980 | 4.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 5,697,404 | 3.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 1,497,414 | 3.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 514,885 | 4.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 166,146 | 4.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 148,271 | 3.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 64,538 | 4.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 55,026 | 6.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 20,803 | 6.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 32,213 | 5.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 18,528 | 5.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 35,766 | 1.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 2,064 | 10.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 9,651 | 3.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 26,277 | 2.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 3,958 | 1.00% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 377 | 4.3% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.53% | 173 | 35.3% |