Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Chickasaw
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,484,740 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 20.0% |
| Range | 23.5% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Western Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.3 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 88.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 87.6 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Basques | 86.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |