Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Chickasaw
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,376,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 39.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 94.8% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 21.4% | 35.8% |
| Median | 18.3% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |