Luxembourger vs Cheyenne 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Cheyenne
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Luxembourgers
Cheyenne
59.1%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
54.3%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
13.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,657,746 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 59.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,710,429 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 54.3%, a difference of 8.7%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Cheyenne |
Minimum | 46.0% | 32.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.0% | 68.0% |
Mean | 71.7% | 64.5% |
Median | 69.5% | 62.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.4% | 51.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.1% | 75.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.7% | 24.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 16.5% |
Similar Demographics by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bhutanese (59.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (59.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Afghan (59.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Celtic (59.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Spaniard (59.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 59.3% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 59.3% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 59.3% |
Spaniards | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 59.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 59.2% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 59.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 59.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 59.1% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 59.0% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 59.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 58.9% |
Spanish Americans | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 58.9% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 58.9% |
Osage | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 58.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 58.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Immigrants from Belgium (54.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latin America (54.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Peru (54.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Turkish (54.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (54.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
Carpatho Rusyns | 16.2 /100 | #198 | Poor 54.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 15.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 54.4% |
Houma | 15.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 54.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 54.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 14.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 54.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 14.3 /100 | #203 | Poor 54.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 13.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 54.3% |
Cheyenne | 13.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 54.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 13.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 54.3% |
Turks | 13.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 54.3% |
Egyptians | 12.0 /100 | #208 | Poor 54.3% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 12.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 54.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 54.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 11.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 54.2% |
Immigrants | Chile | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 54.2% |