WikiProjects etc.
Military history
Kent
Opera
Christianity
Translations
Other Projects
Images
DYKs
Official
France
Other talk
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016






Translation from Dutch Wikipedia

edit

All existing talk on this topic is stored here. Unlike the other sections in my archive, this is meant as an active talk-archive, so if you have any additional discussion on any of the topics stored there, or on a new topic related to such translations, do not hesitate to add it there. Neddyseagoon - talk 12:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from it:Tempio di Minerva (Aventino) into Temple of Minerva (Aventine). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I see you did not add the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license, when you created the article Anne Brown. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sutton Hoo helmet

edit

Hi there! A very old edit by you added that the Sutton Hoo helmet was displayed at the 1951 Festival of Britain. Do you remember what your source for this was? I haven't been able to find anything through Google or other databases/newspapers. --Usernameunique (talk) 10:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi again---not to bother you, but I was hoping to check back in and see if you might have an idea on the source for that edit. Thanks! --Usernameunique (talk) 12:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 2 January

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Eroor 404

edit

http://www.herenvanholland.nl/eigenaar.cfm?eigenaarnummer=1550 Xx236 (talk) 14:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wolfgang Lipp (theologian)

edit
 

The article Wolfgang Lipp (theologian) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obviously very incomplete, with a missing Life sections.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Template:AKL

edit

Hi! I noticed you created {{AKL}} ten days ago or so. I don't think it has any documentation, so would it be possible for you to add some minimal documentation to the page so other editors can figure out what it does? I think it's related to {{BBKL}}, but I'm not sure. Thanks! Enterprisey (talk!) 03:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sculptors by century and nationality

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Sculptors by century and nationality requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 18:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Slovene salon-holders

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Slovene salon-holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 14:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Paul Leopold Haffner) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Paul Leopold Haffner, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Well done on creating all these articles. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

edit

Thank you for your recent articles, including Andrzej Niemirowicz, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please archive your page

edit

It is too long to be readable, it almost crashed my browser. If you don't know how to archive your page, ask for help at Wikipedia:Helpdesk. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reviewed

edit

Hi, I've reviewed some of your pages. For the biographies of naval officers, please expand them to indicate notability and please remember to use inline citations as opposed to a mere source list. I've also added {{archiveme}} to the top of this talk page as it's getting really long. Thanks! DrStrauss talk 13:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Jean-Louis Rouméguère) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Jean-Louis Rouméguère, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Does the artist meet WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG? There's not enough in this to see why he is notable. Can you help improve it?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 8 February

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Franz Karl Praßl

edit

Hi, I'm Robert McClenon. Neddyseagoon, thanks for creating Franz Karl Praßl!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There is a longer article in the German Wikipedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Leise

edit

Tank you for the start on Leise. I don't understand "they were often unanimous or consisting of a single stanza". "Unanimous" looks like a translation of "einstimmig" but for singing, einstimmig means that all sing the same melody, no different parts, - is there a word in English, other "in homophony" which sounds awkward. And why "or"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

12th century

edit

Re: this - I doubt that talking about a Roman Catholic Church before the Reformation makes much sense. There was one catholic church in Western Europe at that time, - "theologian" captures that well enough. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Huysse redirect

edit

Hi Neddy, I see you have just created a redirect to a non-existant page. Have you perhaps misspelled the destination? IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

OK it's there now :-) IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ami Chessex

edit

Hello Neddyseagoon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ami Chessex for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 14:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Abbots by religion has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Abbots by religion, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

All the Angels

edit

When I read this, for some incongruous reason, I had a mental image of Johnny Depp as I Am Crow. As you have done all the work on this I am reluctant to jump in but would it be a bit intrusive, or otherwise spoil the flow, if I added "Dublin porter" after "Crazy Crow"? It would probably be referenced as a footnote: {{refn|"Crazy Crow" was the nickname of one George Hendrick, a porter for Dublin Musicians|Group=n}}, with a book reference attached. Thanks. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Done.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 10:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Grigory Alexandrovich Demidov) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Grigory Alexandrovich Demidov, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your time and effort in writing this - it's appreciated. It's been reviewed now. Could you look at it and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

March Madness 2017

edit

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Maria Luise Thurmair

edit

On 28 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria Luise Thurmair, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Maria Luise Thurmair published the "love talks" she exchanged with her husband when he was a soldier in World War II, and wrote the lyrics for many hymns in the Gotteslob? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Luise Thurmair. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maria Luise Thurmair), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

about Jamie Curtis

edit

Hi, Swpb informed me that he proposed deletion of Jamie Curtis. Considering that I just created Jamie Curtis on 7 December 2008‎ as a redirect page redirecting Jamie Lee Curtis, and you changed it to a main article on 9 January 2009, I think that it is appropriate to let you know this proposed deletion. Thank you for your contributions. --Neo-Jay (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of David Peart for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Peart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Peart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Louis Alexandre de La Rochefoucauld d'Enville
added links pointing to Forges and Turgot
Boris Vladimirovitch Golitsyn
added a link pointing to François de La Rochefoucauld
Ernest II, Count of Mansfeld-Vorderort
added a link pointing to Stolberg
Georg Engelhard Schröder
added a link pointing to Estates

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (St Mary the Virgin Church, Wendens Ambo) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating St Mary the Virgin Church, Wendens Ambo, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've done general cleanup. I've added a source, linked to it from the pre-existing Wikimedia Commons category and the Grade I listed buildings in Essex page, added a link to the official website and tags on the talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 13:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ursula of Munsterberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Glatz and Munsterberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madame Cavé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rentier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:UNESCO officials has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:UNESCO officials, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Martin's Church, Plaistow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plaistow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of IAZYGES 1

edit
 

A tag has been placed on IAZYGES 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Moved to make way for move.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles de Coligny
added links pointing to Oratorian and Siege of Paris
Jacqueline de Montbel d'Entremont
added links pointing to Battle of Saint-Denis and Gaspard de Coligny

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Marc-Claude de Buttet) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Marc-Claude de Buttet, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I looks like you're still working on the translation of the empty sections.

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Guillaume de Gadagne
added a link pointing to Estates General
Jacqueline de Montbel d'Entremont
added a link pointing to Margaret of France
Marc-Claude de Buttet
added a link pointing to Margaret of France

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacques Rousseau (diplomat)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jacques Rousseau (diplomat), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Adnan Enaya Afzal  talk 11:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Église Notre-Dame-de-Confort
added links pointing to Dominican and Francesco Salviati
Church of the Holy Name and Our Lady of the Sacred Heart, Bow
added a link pointing to Our Lady of the Sacred Heart
Ciro riconosciuto
added a link pointing to Amasis
Pierre-Joseph de Beauchamp
added a link pointing to Yedi Kule
St Leonard's Priory, London
added a link pointing to John Leland
Vidar Norheim
added a link pointing to EP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Natalia Ryumina

edit
 

The article Natalia Ryumina has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The garmine (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carlo Giuseppe Plura

edit
 

The article Carlo Giuseppe Plura has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The garmine (talk) 13:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Their Finest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Biographies of filmmakers

edit

Hello! Just a reminder, the Film project does not cover biography articles. Therefore, the {{WikiProject Film}} banner should not be added to articles about actors, directors and filmmakers. Those articles are covered by adding |filmbio-work-group=yes to {{WikiProject Biography}} instead. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jean Le Michaud d'Arçon
added links pointing to Saint-Germain and Auteuil
Monsieur Fabre
added links pointing to Pierre Bertin and CICC
English Without Tears
added a link pointing to Territorial Army
Les Lavandières du Portugal
added a link pointing to Alwyn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Charles Delagrave (publisher)) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Charles Delagrave (publisher), Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, thanks for writing this article. I've reviewed it and the only concern is the lack of inline citations. As the article gets edited by others, this will be far harder to fix, so I'm hoping that while it's fresh in your mind / easily looked into, you can make them inline. Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Monsieur Fabre) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Monsieur Fabre, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, you've certainly been busy creating articles, that's wonderful! There is an inline note for this but I can't see where your sources are. There was an external link (it didn't say this was your source, but perhaps it was?) to IMDB, which I removed as it is an unreliable source, as, like Wikipedia, it can be edited by anyone. Do you have any reliable sources for this film? If so, please add them. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Jean Georgescu) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Jean Georgescu, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'll leave this as the last of yours I review today, as I don't want to overwhelm you with messages and the issues are essentially the same, they all seem to have issues around sourcing. This has no references - it has external links, but it's not clear if these were used as sources for the article and if so, which source for which piece of information. The AfD looks a clear error, so hopefully that will be closed soon, but at the moment there is too little to make his reasons for notability clear and it is unsourced.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Referencing

edit

Neddyseagoon, I'm wondering from your Talk page if you read your messages or if you choose not to? You don't seem to have responded to any of the many messages above, going back several years. Please let me know if you do. I certainly recognise something of my own approach to editing when reviewing your articles - create many stubs, to get things started which can then grow. I do this because there are so many missing articles on clearly notable people. However, you've been around too long to be persistently creating unreferenced articles, or articles with major referencing issues. A lack of inline citations is incredibly difficult to resolve as an article grows and it's left permanently tagged, when it could have been easily and quickly formatted right at the start. You're the most experienced article creator on English Wikipedia not to have autopatrol rights, so it's creating a lot of work at New Page Patrol, plus numerous mistakenly opened deletion discussions/proposals. It's a shame, because you seem, on the whole, to be producing articles on notable people that are quite well-written. Please consider slowing down a bit and making sure the articles are sourced well enough. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (The Assembly at Wanstead House) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating The Assembly at Wanstead House, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to verify the page's content and establish notability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Meatsgains (talk) 12:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (John West Wilson) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating John West Wilson, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

\Hello, I guess you choose not to read/respond to messages at all, but I don't feel it's acceptable that after a decade's editing, and being a prolific creator of articles, that you refuse to add sources properly to any of your articles. If the external link is actually a source, please put it inline, it also needs more sourcing, but that can be developed over time. You also keep linking dates, but the guidelines were changed several years ago and these need to be deleted. I hope letting you know this will save you time in the future as you will avoid adding them and others won't need to use their time deleting them. Best wishes, and again thanks for taking the time to write articles, Boleyn (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Grigory Dmitriyevich Yusupov) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Grigory Dmitriyevich Yusupov, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this, but again there are significant sourcing issues. I'll work on it, and if you are able to work on it further, I'd be grateful.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Order of St Mary Magdalene) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Order of St Mary Magdalene, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'll make this the last one I review of yours today, so I'm not inundating you. Can you please change this (or let me know and I'll change it for you) - I'm unclear if the bibliography section is sources you've used, and they need to be made inline, or is more of a 'further reading' section.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Max Simonischek) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Max Simonischek, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, if you would prefer I didn't send you the review as you may feel it's too much, please send me a message and I'll just tick them off. This man is probably notable, but this is an unreferenced biography of a living person, which is a major concern. I'll see what i can do to improve it, but the WP:BURDEN od sourcing falls on the creator.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 12:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Don Juan Comes Back From The War) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Don Juan Comes Back From The War, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I am assuming this is notable because it has articles in 2 other Wikipedias, but notability isn't asserted or verified in this article - it just states it is a film and says a little about the plot, has links to script but no sources. Please add your sources to this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Madame Cavé) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Madame Cavé, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please look at the 'bibliography' section and clarify whether these were used as sources and need to be made inline, or are already inline, or if this is a 'further reading' section.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Wanstead Roman Villa) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Wanstead Roman Villa, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I see you have continued to create articles that need inline citations. If you continue to do this, I will initiate an ANI, as you are an experienced editor who won't respond to messages and isn't following Wikipedia guidelines. Please stop, I don't want either of us to end up in a discussion like that, and if isn't necessary. Especially as your sources here are quite obscure, no one else will be able to move them inline.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 06:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Template:Cite Mullié

edit

I noticed that you started a number of biographies on French officers of the Napoleonic wars such as Jean-Baptiste Broussier, and that you included a template to "Biographie des célébrités militaires des armées de terre et de mer de 1789 à 1850". I have rewritten the template so that if the name on wikisource is given it will link to the correct article eg:

  • {{Cite Mullié|wstitle=BROUSSIER (JEAN-BAPTISTE, comte)}}
  • Mullié, Charles (1852). "BROUSSIER (JEAN-BAPTISTE, comte)" . Biographie des célébrités militaires des armées de terre et de mer de 1789 à 1850  (in French). Paris: Poignavant et Compagnie.

This may be of help if you decide to write another similar article. -- PBS (talk) 20:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

ANI

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 19:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia

edit

Are you aware that you should not take chunks of articles somebody else has researched and created and use them to create articles such as the ones you created at Stretford Road Workhouse and Withington Workhouse? If you aren't aware you should be, see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. The lack of attribution gives the impression that you did the work.

You have stripped the Chorlton PLU article of important information and so I am going to restore it and redirect the articles to where they belong. When you can provide more information of your own you could recreate them in your own words. J3Mrs (talk) 19:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently failing to respond to messages posted for you on this page regarding important issues which editors are trying to discuss with you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Neddyseagoon, I have blocked you based on a discussion at the administrators' noticeboard because you have been either ignoring or simply not receiving messages posted on this page, including a post regarding that noticeboard discussion which was posted a few lines above this section. A number of editors would like to discuss problems with your edits, but you have not acknowledged or responded, and this seems to have been going on for several years. Because you do not respond on this page or elsewhere when you are notified of a discussion, and you have not enabled email, there is no other way to reach you. You will not be able to edit elsewhere while you are blocked, but it is my hope that you will respond to the important messages here in the meantime. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have also manually archived old messages on this page into annual archive subpages (User talk:Neddyseagoon/2012 up to User talk:Neddyseagoon/2016), following a pattern you seemed to have been following up to 2012, because this page was much too long. This was one of the problems that other editors had tried to discuss with you. If you would like to archive some other way or set up automatic archiving with a bot, I would be more than happy to help. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Responding to talk page messages

edit

Hi there. If you have read the last few talk page notices above, and the ANI discussion, you will have seen the concerns raised about your lack of responses to talk page messages. I am trying to work out what is going on here. I get the impression that you prefer to edit and work on articles, rather than engage in discussions, though you have responded to messages in the past. That is only my initial impression, though. This may come across as too personal a question, but are you able to say why you don't respond to messages left here? Would it help to discuss that here, rather than at ANI, or maybe even to discuss some aspects of this another way? If you are able to respond here, that would help make a start at sorting things out here. Carcharoth (talk) 17:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Result of ANI

edit

Hello, the ANI discussion regarding your editing habits has concluded. The result of the discussion was that you are allowed to continue creating articles, but they must be sourced and not copied from other locations. Should you fail to keep within these bounds, and fail to respond to notifications or queries from other users, you will be indefinitely blocked. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Henry Thomas Hope

edit

Hi -

Looking at the history of the Henry Thomas Hope page, it looks like you initially created this page. I found last night when I went to add an edit to it that it had been vandalized with inappropriate content. I think I have it cleaned up, and have added my new edits, but I thought you might want to take a look at it.

Thanks so much! Diane Snider

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Workhouses in Hertfordshire

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Workhouses in Hertfordshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 05:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Charles I of the United Kingdom listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Charles I of the United Kingdom. Since you had some involvement with the Charles I of the United Kingdom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevéselbert 08:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

edit

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Robin Hood episode guide

edit

 Template:Robin Hood episode guide has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Iain Mitchell

edit
 

The article Iain Mitchell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia, specifically the general notability guideline and verifiability policy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dysklyver 20:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Umberto Menin

edit
 

The article Umberto Menin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any non-Wikipedia sources that would indicate this guy passes WP:GNG outright. Although a professor, he's not a publishing academic of the type that WP:PROF applies to. He does not appear to pass WP:NARTIST either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 01:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:British military physicians has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:British military physicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Neddyseagoon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

edit

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

V2 (Ace Combat) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect V2 (Ace Combat). Since you had some involvement with the V2 (Ace Combat) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

User group for Military Historians

edit

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Epps family for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epps family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epps family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Roman military remains in Scotland

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Roman military remains in Scotland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT go beyond 20:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Belated best wishes for a happy 2018

edit
 
The Fox Hunt (1893) by Winslow Homer, Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.

== BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Roland Riem for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roland Riem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Riem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I think you created this article in 2016. Tacyarg (talk) 22:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Biblical art by medium has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Biblical art by medium, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
 
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

... and five --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:1786 events of the French Revolution has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:1786 events of the French Revolution, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

edit

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
  • updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar for your efforts

edit
  The Epic Barnstar
For your continued high quality contributions, improving an array of history-based articles on Wikipedia. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 09:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus April 2018

edit
 

ICHTHUS

April 2018

Project News
By Lionelt

Belated Happy Easter and Kalo Pascha! We're excited to announce the return of our newsletter Ichthus! Getting this issue out was touch-and-go for a while. Check out what's happening at the Project:


Achievements

 
Hedy Lamarr as Delilah

In March the Project saw four articles promoted to GA-Class. They were the oh-so-irresistible Delilah (nom. MagicatthemovieS) (pictured), Edict of Torda (nom. Borsoka), David Meade (author) (nom. LovelyGirl7) and last but not least Black Christmas (2006 film) (nom. Drown_Soda). Black Christmas? How did that get in there lol? Congratulations to all of the nominators for a job well done!


Did You Know
Nominated by The C of E

... that some people know Christ the Lord is risen today from Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch?"

Featured article
Nominated by FutureTrillionaire

Jesus (7–2 BC to 30–33 AD) is the central figure of Christianity, whom the teachings of most Christian denominations hold to be the Son of God and the awaited Messiah of the Old Testament. Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that a historical Jesus existed, although there is little agreement on the reliability of the gospel narratives and how closely the biblical Jesus reflects the historical Jesus. Most scholars agree that Jesus was a Jewish preacher from Galilee, was baptized by John the Baptist, and was crucified in Jerusalem on the orders of the Roman prefect, Pontius Pilate. Christians generally believe that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of a virgin, performed miracles, founded the Church, died by crucifixion as a sacrifice to achieve atonement, rose from the dead, and ascended into heaven, from which he will return. The great majority of Christians worship Jesus as the incarnation of God the Son, the second of three Persons of a Divine Trinity. A few Christian groups reject Trinitarianism, wholly or partly, as non-scriptural. In Islam, Jesus is considered one of God's important prophets and the Messiah. (Full article...)


Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here. And if the publication of this issue is any indication, you're in for the ride of a lifetime!


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom
To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Delivered: 00:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Monasteries in Scotland by order has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Monasteries in Scotland by order, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

John Hope

edit

The Wikipedia entry for Jan Hope (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Hope) says that Hope was a follower of the Scottish Enlightenment and joined societies that propagated it. Could you tell me what is the source of this information? I am curious to know since I am writing an article on Jan Hope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhengstmengel (talkcontribs) 18:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Longitude

edit

I was thinking of adding some detail to the Longitude page, but did not want to begin without touching base with you. You must have enjoyed this series as much as I did. I guess i never noticed the UK version was 50 minutes longer. I have the UK DVD but will have to look more closely to see what the additional material was. Do you recall? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cglenn3932 (talkcontribs) 21:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus: May 2018

edit
 

ICHTHUS

May 2018

Project News
By Lionelt

Last month's auspicious relaunch of our newsletter precipitated something of an uproar in the Wikipedia community. What started as a localized edit war over censorship spilled over onto the Administrator's Noticeboard finally ending up at Wikipedia's supreme judicial body ArbCom. Their ruling resulted in the admonishment of administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise for his involvement in the dispute. The story was reported by Wikipedia's venerable flagship newspaper The Signpost.

The question of whether to delete all portals--including the 27 Christianity-related portals--was put to the Wikipedia community. Approximately 400 editors have participated in the protracted discussion. Going by !votes, Oppose deletion has a distinct majority. The original Christianity Portal was created on November 5, 2005 by Brisvegas and the following year he successfully nominated the portal for Featured Portal. The Transhumanist has revived WikiProject Portals with hopes of revitalizing Wikipedia's system of 1,515 portals.

Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project Watch


Achievements

Four articles in the Project were promoted to GA: Edict of Torda nom. by Borsoka, Jim Bakker nom. by LovelyGirl7, Ralph Abernathy nom. by Coffee and Psalm 84 nom. by Gerda_Arendt. The Psalm ends with "O Lord of hosts, blessed is the man that trusteth in thee." Words to live by. Please support our members and send some WikiLove to the nominators!

Featured article
Nominated by Spangineer

 

Operation Auca was an attempt by five Evangelical Christian missionaries from the United States to make contact with the Huaorani people of the rainforest of Ecuador. The Huaorani, also known as the Aucas, were an isolated tribe known for their violence, both against their own people and outsiders who entered their territory. With the intention of being the first Protestants to evangelize the Huaorani, the missionaries began making regular flights over Huaorani settlements in September 1955, dropping gifts. After several months of exchanging gifts, on January 2, 1956, the missionaries established a camp at "Palm Beach", a sandbar along the Curaray River, a few miles from Huaorani settlements. Their efforts culminated on January 8, 1956, when all five—Jim Elliot, Nate Saint, Ed McCully, Peter Fleming, and Roger Youderian—were attacked and speared by a group of Huaorani warriors. The news of their deaths was broadcast around the world, and Life magazine covered the event with a photo essay. The deaths of the men galvanized the missionary effort in the United States, sparking an outpouring of funding for evangelization efforts around the world. Their work is still frequently remembered in evangelical publications, and in 2006, was the subject of the film production End of the Spear. (more...)


Did You Know
Nominated by Dahn

"... that, shortly after being sentenced to death for treason, Ioan C. Filitti became manager of the National Theatre Bucharest?"


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom• Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 19:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposal to rename category "12th-century Byzantine theologians"

edit

Please see my proposal to rename Category:12th-century Byzantine theologians to 12th-century Eastern Orthodox theologians. Hugo999 (talk) 01:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Carolingian architects has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Carolingian architects, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:54, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

edit

Hello Neddyseagoon! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 22:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus June 2018

edit
 

ICHTHUS

June 2018

Project news
By Lionelt

Here are discussions relevant to the Project:

The following articles need reviewers for GA-class: Type of Constans nom. by Gog the Mild, Tian Feng (magazine) nom. by Finnusertop. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project Watch


Did You Know
Nominated by Gonzonoir

... that in 1636, Phineas Hodson, Chancellor of York Minster, lost his 38-year-old wife Jane during the birth of the couple's 24th child?

Featured article
Nominated by Cliftonian

 
The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara

The Mortara case was a controversy precipitated by the Papal States' seizure of Edgardo Mortara, a six-year-old Jewish child, from his family in Bologna, Italy, in 1858. The city's inquisitor, Father Pier Feletti, heard from a servant that she had administered emergency baptism to the boy when he fell sick as an infant, and the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition held that this made the child irrevocably a Catholic. Because the Papal States had forbidden the raising of Christians by members of other faiths, it was ordered that he be taken from his family and brought up by the Church. After visits from the child's father, international protests mounted, but Pope Pius IX would not be moved. The boy grew up as a Catholic with the Pope as a substitute father, trained for the priesthood in Rome until 1870, and was ordained in France three years later. In 1870 the Kingdom of Italy captured Rome during the unification of Italy, ending the pontifical state; opposition across Italy, Europe and the United States over Mortara's treatment may have contributed to its downfall. (Full article...)


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 11:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Bronze Age Greek art has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Bronze Age Greek art, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Izzat Kutebar (talk) 15:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:HansGeering.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:HansGeering.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:HansGeering.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:HansGeering.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus: July 2018

edit
 

ICHTHUS

July 2018

The Top 7 report
By Lionelt

The big news was the marriage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The Top 7 most popular articles in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Elizabeth I of England – legendary monarch who ushered in the Elizabethan Era over the dead body of her half-sister (#5)
    2. Henry VIII of England – on his deathbed the last words of the king who founded the English Reformation were "Monks! Monks! Monks!"
    3. Martin Luther King Jr. – can't wait to see the new US$5 bill featuring the "I Have a Dream" speech
    4. Seven deadly sins – surprisingly "original research" is not one of the Seven deadly sins
    5. Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC)
    6. Michael Curry (bishop) – our article says that he upstaged Meghan at her wedding. Did you see her wedding pictures? All I can say is {{dubious}}
    7. Robert F. Kennedy – when informed that missiles were being installed in Cuba he famously quipped, "Can they hit Oxford, Mississippi?"


Did you know
Nominated by The C of E

... that the little-known 1758 Methodist hymn "Sun of Unclouded Righteousness" asks God to send the doctrine of the "Unitarian fiend ... back to hell", referring to both Islam and Unitarianism?

Our newest Featured list
Nominated by Freikorp

[[File:|200px|The Last Judgment by painter Hans Memling. ]]
The Last Judgment by painter Hans Memling.

List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. Predictions of apocalyptic events that would result in the extinction of humanity, a collapse of civilization, or the destruction of the planet have been made since at least the beginning of the Christian Era. Most predictions are related to Abrahamic religions, often standing for or similar to the eschatological events described in their scriptures. Christian predictions typically refer to events like the Rapture, Great Tribulation, Last Judgment, and the Second Coming of Christ.

Polls conducted in 2012 across 20 countries found over 14% of people believe the world will end in their lifetime, with percentages raging from 6% of people in France to 22% in the US and Turkey. In the UK in 2015, the general public believed the likeliest cause would be nuclear war, while experts thought it would be artificial intelligence. Between one and three percent of people from both countries thought the apocalypse would be caused by zombies or alien invasion. (more...)


Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 06:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

"German siege"

edit

Oh, how I've waited for this day. To finally meet one of your kind, and ask some honest questions. When you wrote your Siege of Sevastopol (panorama), until this day when I corrected it, you said "German siege of Sevastopol", instead of "German-Romanian", as you should've. Look, you are a Westerner who for some reason failed mention my country in key historical moments it took great part in, in the 21st century when access to such information is literally seconds away. You are sadly a common occurrence, but I've never actually met one of your type before. I have a bunch of very sincere questions I'd like answered.

  • 1. Were you too lazy to write "German-Romanian" instead of just "German"?
  • 2. Were you genuinely ignorant on Romania's consistent contribution to this Axis victory?
  • 3. Do you and those like you have an actual secret agenda to erase my country from history? If so, why?
  • 4. To this very day, five years later, do you still believe that Romania's contribution, great enough to prompt Hitler to order a special Golden Crimea Shield for Romania's military dictator (granted Manstein got it too, but months later, it clearly originated for the Romanian leader) should continue being ignored?

Disclaimer: I do not mean to accuse you. These are questions I formulated after seeing numerous documentaries and even pieces of literature "forgetting" to mention Romania's key role in major battles it took part. When access to such info is again, very fast and easy, so really they got not excuse. This cannot stand, mate. This is theft of the worst caliber, stealing a country's past. This is lying by omission. Thus, I asked you these because I need to find the cause, in order to formulate a solution. Torpilorul (talk) 11:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Years of the French Third Republic has been nominated for merging. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Birley family tree

edit

 Template:Birley family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CoverImageChurchTimes.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:CoverImageChurchTimes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Are Archdeacons notable by office?

edit

Neddy, can I ask you to look at this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wandlyn SnelgroveBashereyre (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Anglican province

edit

 Template:Infobox Anglican province has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox Christian denomination. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

edit
 
 

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Incoming (play) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Incoming (play) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incoming (play) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  03:33, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Vacquerie

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charles Vacquerie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. » Shadowowl | talk 18:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Charles Vacquerie for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Vacquerie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Vacquerie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 19:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

edit
 
 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Replaced entire article you authored in 2007. Assertions unverifiable. Unreferenced since.

edit

Epiphanias. Rhadow (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Poor law unions in Dorset has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Poor law unions in Dorset, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:21, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Workhouses in Scotland has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Workhouses in Scotland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Antonine dynasty

edit

 Template:Antonine dynasty has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 06:00, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nervo-Trajanic Dynasty

edit

 Template:Nervo-Trajanic Dynasty has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jean-Laurent Kopp moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Jean-Laurent Kopp, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Fronberg

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Fronberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 1l2l3k (talk) 21:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fronberg listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fronberg. Since you had some involvement with the Fronberg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bollywood war films has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Bollywood war films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:29, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Christian denominations active in Germany has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Christian denominations active in Germany, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:MadonnaBeardlessJoseph.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MadonnaBeardlessJoseph.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 22:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Suvee.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Suvee.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 23:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Willlinley.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Willlinley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 23:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Doverromanpaintedhouse3.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doverromanpaintedhouse3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:37, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Small categories for churches

edit

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_27#Category:Congregational churches in Cambridge and the two "Churches" sections below it. – Fayenatic London 11:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please repair the broken link to the reference about the tomb. I have not been able to locate it or I would have done so myself. Shipsview (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Cardinal protopresbyter listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cardinal protopresbyter. Since you had some involvement with the Cardinal protopresbyter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 1124 papal election

edit
 

The article 1124 papal election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too small to even count as a stub. All recent activity has been Gnomish, not content related. The election is covered in more details at Pope_Honorius_II#Conclave_of_1124

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 17:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Hetmans of Livonia has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Hetmans of Livonia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:26, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Margaret Cavendish Harley.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Margaret Cavendish Harley.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:French Revolution left

edit

 Template:French Revolution left has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 21:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus June 2019

edit
 

ICHTHUS

June 2019
The Top 6 Articles
By Stalinsunnykvj

The sad news was the 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings. The Top 6 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Louis XIV of France – a monarch of the House of Bourbon who reigned as King of France. He did say, "Every time I appoint someone to a vacant position, I make a hundred unhappy and one ungrateful."
    2. Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC), Mary was found guilty of plotting to assassinate Elizabeth I of England in 1586, and was beheaded the following year.
    3. Elizabeth I of England – The Virgin Queen, Elizabeth was the last of the five monarchs of the House of Tudor who ushered in the Elizabethan Era, reversed re-establishment of Roman Catholicism by her half-sister.
    4. Henry VIII of EnglandKing of England, He was an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his known piece of music is "Pastime with Good Company". He is often reputed to have written "Greensleeves" but probably did not. He had six marriages.
    5. Martin Luther King Jr.
      " There are three urgent and indeed great problems that we face not only in the United States of America but all over the world today. That is the problem of racism, the problem of poverty and the problem of war."
    6. Billy Ray Cyrus – Having released 12 studio albums and 44 singles since 1992, he is best known for his number one single "Achy Breaky Heart", which became the first single ever to achieve triple Platinum status in Australia.
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj

... that the first attempt to build the Holy Trinity Cathedral of the Alexander Nevsky Lavra resulted in the demolition of the nearly completed structure?

Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
 
Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral, Cork, Ireland

Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral is a Gothic Revival three-spire cathedral in the city of Cork, Ireland. It belongs to the Church of Ireland and was completed in 1879. The cathedral is located on the south side of the River Lee, on ground that has been a place of worship since the 7th century, and is dedicated to Finbarr of Cork, patron saint of the city. It was once in the Diocese of Cork; it is now one of the three cathedrals in the Church of Ireland Diocese of Cork, Cloyne and Ross, in the ecclesiastical province of Dublin. Christian use of the site dates back to a 7th-century AD monastery, which according to legend was founded by Finbarr of Cork. The entrances contain the figures of over a dozen biblical figures, capped by a tympanum showing a Resurrection scene. (more...)

Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.




Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 10:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Scottish peoples has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Scottish peoples, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Blacas.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Blacas.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Truguet.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Truguet.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus July 2019

edit
 

ICHTHUS

July 2019
The Top 6 Articles
By Stalinsunnykvj

A suicide attack on July 11th claimed by Islamic State (IS) near a church in the Syrian city of Qamishli shows that Christians remain a major target of the terror group. The Top 6 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Henry VIII of EnglandKing of England, He was an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his known piece of music is "Pastime with Good Company". He is often reputed to have written "Greensleeves" but probably did not. He had six marriages.
    2. Elena Cornaro Piscopia – was a Venetian philosopher of noble descent who in 1678 became one of the first women to receive an academic degree from a university, and the first to receive a Doctor of Philosophy degree. In 1669, she translated the Colloquy of Christ by Carthusian monk Lanspergius from Spanish into Italian.
    3. Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC), Mary was found guilty of plotting to assassinate Elizabeth I of England in 1586, and was beheaded the following year.
    4. Bob Dylan – American singer-songwriter, author, and visual artist.
      " Take care of all your memories. For you cannot relive them."
    5. Elizabeth I of England – The Virgin Queen, Elizabeth was the last of the five monarchs of the House of Tudor who ushered in the Elizabethan Era, reversed re-establishment of Roman Catholicism by her half-sister.
    6. Billy Ray Cyrus – Having released 12 studio albums and 44 singles since 1992, he is best known for his number one single "Achy Breaky Heart", which became the first single ever to achieve triple Platinum status in Australia.
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
... that The Vision of Dorotheus is one of the earliest examples of Christian hexametric poetry?
Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
 
Eric and Leslie Ludy were 21 and 16 respectively when they first met, English professors suggest that older singles are unlikely to gather hope from their story.

When God Writes Your Love Story: The Ultimate Approach to Guy/Girl Relationships is a 1999 book by Eric and Leslie Ludy, an American married couple. After becoming a bestseller on the Christian book market, the book was republished in 2004 and then revised and expanded in 2009. It tells the story of the authors' first meeting, courtship, and marriage. The authors advise single people not to be physically or emotionally intimate with others, but to wait for the spouse that God has planned for them.

The book is divided into five sections and sixteen chapters. Each chapter is written from the perspective of one of the two authors; nine are by Eric, while Leslie wrote seven, as well as the introduction. The Ludys argue that one's love life should be both guided by and subordinate to one's relationship with God. Leslie writes that God offers new beginnings to formerly unchaste or sexually abused individuals. (more...)

Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.




Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 12:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Franciscan monasteries in Ecuador

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Franciscan monasteries in Ecuador requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Portraits of Philip IV by Velazquez

edit
 

The article Portraits of Philip IV by Velazquez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2009, abandoned draft-like content, redundant as we have solid articles on Velazquez.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 05:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

edit
 

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Christian monasteries in Ecuador

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian monasteries in Ecuador requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Blackpool Sands, Blackpool

edit
 

The article Blackpool Sands, Blackpool has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources or any real content, not sure what the point of the page is

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dexxtrall (talk) 14:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Monasteries in Ecuador

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Monasteries in Ecuador requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Letourner.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Letourner.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:CallipygianVenus.jpg

edit
 

The file File:CallipygianVenus.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus December 2019

edit
 

ICHTHUS

 
December 2019
The Top 3 Articles

By Stalinsunnykvj

The Top 3 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Dolly Parton - an American singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, record producer, actress, author, businesswoman, and humanitarian, known primarily for her work in country music.   Quotations related to Dolly Parton at Wikiquote: " I just depend on a lot of prayer and meditation. I believe that without God I am nobody, but that with God, I can do anything."
    2. Harriet Tubman - an American abolitionist and political activist. Born into slavery, she escaped and made some missions to rescue enslaved people, using the network of antislavery activists and Underground Railroads. During the American Civil War, she served as an armed scout, spy for the Union Army.
    3. Henry VIII of EnglandKing of England, He was an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his known piece of music is "Pastime with Good Company". He is often reputed to have written "Greensleeves" but probably did not. He had six marriages.
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
  • ... that St. Charles College in Louisiana was the first Jesuit college established in the southern United States?
  • ... that the ancient Jewish text of Perek Shirah asserts that spiders and rats praise God using verses from Psalm 150?
Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
 

Being a Ghost Story of Christmas, commonly known as A Christmas Carol, is a novella by Charles Dickens, first published in London by Chapman & Hall in 1843 and illustrated by John Leech. The book is divided into five chapters, which Dickens titled "staves". A Christmas Carol recounts the story of Ebenezer Scrooge, an elderly miser who is visited by the ghost of his former business partner Jacob Marley and the spirits of Christmas Past, Present and Yet to Come. After their visits, Scrooge is transformed into a kinder, gentler man. (more...)

Bible Verse

Romans 12:10 New King James Version (NKJV)

Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.


Quotes
" I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year."
Charles Dickens – British novelist, journalist, editor, illustrator and social critic.

 

Happy Holidays!

The end of the year is a time of year for remembrance. We take stock of where we came from, and have a moment to think about where we are going...

At this special time of year, we give thanks for editors like you who have made our Mission easier and our lives more fulfilling.

May your New Year be all that you hope for, and may it be sprinkled with love and friendship.

Best Wishes!



WikiProject Christianity
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity © Copyleft 2019
QuestionsDiscussionsNewsroomUnsubscribe
Delivered: 16:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


Category:Caesar emperors has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Caesar emperors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Zdzisław Henneberg for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zdzisław Henneberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zdzisław Henneberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 02:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1457 paintings

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:1457 paintings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1451 paintings

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:1451 paintings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:World War II in television fiction

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:World War II in television fiction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:44, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:World War I television fiction

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:World War I television fiction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:12, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus January 2020

edit
 

ICHTHUS

 
January 2020
The Top 3 Articles

By Stalinsunnykvj

The Top 3 most-popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Pope Benedict XVI – retired prelate of the Catholic Church who served as head of the Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State from 2005 until his resignation.
    2. Pope Francis – the head of the Catholic Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State. Francis is the first Jesuit pope, the first from the Americas, the first from the Southern Hemisphere, and the first pope from outside Europe since the Syrian Gregory III, who reigned in the 8th century.
    3. Dolly Parton – an American singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, record producer, actress, author, businesswoman, and humanitarian, known primarily for her work in country music.   Quotations related to Dolly Parton at Wikiquote: "I just depend on a lot of prayer and meditation. I believe that without God I am nobody, but that with God, I can do anything."
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
 
Сретение Господне ("The Meeting of the Lord"), a depiction of Simeon recognising Jesus at the Temple, from a fifteenth-century Novgorodskye School Russian icon.

A Song for Simeon, is a 37-line poem written in 1928 by American-English poet T. S. Eliot (1888–1965). It is one of five poems that Eliot contributed to the Ariel poems series of 38 pamphlets by several authors published by Faber and Gwyer. "A Song for Simeon" was the sixteenth in the series and included an illustration by avant garde artist Edward McKnight Kauffer. The poem's narrative echoes the text of the Nunc dimittis, a liturgical prayer for Compline from the Gospel passage. Eliot introduces literary allusions to earlier writers Lancelot Andrewes, Dante Alighieri and St. John of the Cross. Critics have debated whether Eliot's depiction of Simeon is a negative portrayal of a Jewish figure and evidence of anti-Semitism on Eliot's part. (more...)

Bible Verse

Psalm 20:4 New King James Version (NKJV)

Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.


Quotes
"Faith lived in the incognito is one which is located outside the criticism coming from society, from politics, from history, for the very reason that it has itself the vocation to be a source of criticism. It is faith (lived in the incognito) which triggers the issues for the others, which causes everything seemingly established to be placed in doubt, which drives a wedge into the world of false assurances."
~ Jacques Ellul
French philosopher, sociologist, and professor who was a noted Christian anarchist.
  Quotations related to Jacques Ellul at Wikiquote

 

Happy New Year!

At this special time of year, we give thanks for editors like you who have made our Mission easier and our lives more fulfilling.
May your New Year be all that you hope for, and may it be sprinkled with love and friendship.

Best Wishes!


WikiProject Christianity
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity © Copyleft 2020
QuestionsDiscussionsNewsroomUnsubscribe
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of David Pickvance for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Pickvance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pickvance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Carl Busse (architect) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Busse (architect) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Busse (architect) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PenulisHantu (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sébastien Lapaque

edit
 

The article Sébastien Lapaque has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:JohnFisherConstable.jpg

edit
 

The file File:JohnFisherConstable.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Edward-irving.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Edward-irving.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Ares Borghese - Drawing.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Ares Borghese - Drawing.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Naval battles involving Belize

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Naval battles involving Belize requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dutch warriors

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Dutch warriors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words). Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Milecastles

edit

 Template:Milecastles has been nominated for merging with Template:Hadrian's Wall forts. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 19:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Naval mission" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Naval mission. Since you had some involvement with the Naval mission redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Faulkoner.JPG

edit
 

The file File:Faulkoner.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Answering your 2007 request

edit

You made a request at Talk:Anchor/Archive 2#shank painter, cat head and cat stopper; I've done it. It's all at cathead now instead of Anchor (and I did merge in shank painter). Sorry for the very belated response. HLHJ (talk) 01:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Patrick Gordon (actor)

edit
 

The article Patrick Gordon (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor. List of credits almost entirely minor or uncredited roles. WP:BEFORE shows no sign of reliable sources to help improve the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cathedrals in Hampshire has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Cathedrals in Hampshire has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Secular basilicas has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Secular basilicas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:British portrait artists has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:British portrait artists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 23:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Head of the Minister of Defence's military cabinet for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Head of the Minister of Defence's military cabinet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Head of the Minister of Defence's military cabinet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Medieval Danish sculptors

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Medieval Danish sculptors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Who Do You Love? (2005 film)

edit
 

The article Who Do You Love? (2005 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable short film, does not meet WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 14:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Archduchess Maria Theresa of Austria (1845–1927) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archduchess Maria Theresa of Austria (1845–1927) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archduchess Maria Theresa of Austria (1845–1927) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 15:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ancient Roman architecture by type has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Ancient Roman architecture by type has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Poull-Lorraine

edit

 Template:Poull-Lorraine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk) 21:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Embriaco family has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Embriaco family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Princess Elisabeth Maria of Bavaria for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Elisabeth Maria of Bavaria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Elisabeth Maria of Bavaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Princess Caroline Napoléon for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Caroline Napoléon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Caroline Napoléon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Margaret of Cleves, Duchess of Bavaria-Munich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTGENEALOGY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jay Simpson (actor) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Simpson (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Simpson (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tacyarg (talk) 09:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:The Birth of Venus (Fragonard) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Birth of Venus (Fragonard). Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 08:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:The Model's First Sitting has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Model's First Sitting. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 08:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Route nationale 43

edit
 

The article Route nationale 43 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable road failing WP:NBUILD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor Talk 09:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Territorial_Army_units_(2012) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Territorial_Army_units_(2012) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Territorial_Army_units_(2012) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlueD954 (talk) 03:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Zafar Younis

edit
 

The article Zafar Younis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is about a non-notable character in a TV series.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Juliet Shaw

edit
 

The article Juliet Shaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is about a non-notable character in a TV series.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Christian church councils by holder has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Christian church councils by holder has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Temple of Victoria" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Temple of Victoria. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 16#Temple of Victoria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bohemian clockmakers

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Bohemian clockmakers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Zafar Younis (Spooks).JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Zafar Younis (Spooks).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Calvinist councils and synods has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Calvinist councils and synods has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Baltic-German salon-holders

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Baltic-German salon-holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Croatian salon-holders

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Croatian salon-holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Estonian salon-holders

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Estonian salon-holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Latvian salon-holders

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Latvian salon-holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lithuanian salon-holders

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Lithuanian salon-holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Catholic Church councils in the Middle Ages has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Catholic Church councils in the Middle Ages has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Stephanie Hyam for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephanie Hyam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Hyam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Roman gentes has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Roman gentes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  20:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Jeroboam Sacrificing to Idols

edit
 

Hello, Neddyseagoon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeroboam Sacrificing to Idols".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Anglican bishops by diocese in Ireland has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Anglican bishops by diocese in Ireland has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karl Friedrich Görner

edit
 

The article Karl Friedrich Görner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Enough to avoid a speedy, but no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 17:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Karl Friedrich Görner for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karl Friedrich Görner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Friedrich Görner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StarM 14:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Roman Catholic archbishops by diocese and country has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Roman Catholic archbishops by diocese and country has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Archbishops of Vancouver has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Archbishops of Vancouver has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Archbishops of Winnipeg has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Archbishops of Winnipeg has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The Model's First Sitting

edit

  Hello, Neddyseagoon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Model's First Sitting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Theatres in County Fermanagh

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Theatres in County Fermanagh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:04, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Paintings of the Louvre has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Paintings of the Louvre has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:French Ministers for Work and Social Security has been nominated for renaming to Category:French Ministers of Labour and Social Affairs. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Christianity in the United Kingdom by denomination has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Christianity in the United Kingdom by denomination has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cultural depictions of 11th-century painters

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Cultural depictions of 11th-century painters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cultural depictions of 12th-century painters

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Cultural depictions of 12th-century painters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Watermills in India

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Watermills in India indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Watermills in Pakistan

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Watermills in Pakistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for IRIS Kharg

edit

On 2 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article IRIS Kharg, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Mjroots (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ancient Roman propraetors

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Ancient Roman propraetors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. – Fayenatic London 12:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Naval battles involving the Duchy of Gaeta has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Naval battles involving the Duchy of Gaeta has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Roman roads in Naples has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Roman roads in Naples has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Battles involving the Duchy of Gaeta

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Battles involving the Duchy of Gaeta indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Battles involving the Duchy of Naples

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Battles involving the Duchy of Naples indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Naval battles of the Three Kingdoms

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Naval battles of the Three Kingdoms indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deletion Rod Loomis

edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Template index/Speedy deletion

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Template index/Speedy deletion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

not notable

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Section du Théâtre-Français" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Section du Théâtre-Français. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 20#Section du Théâtre-Français until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  00:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Portrait of Doña Antonia Zárate (1805)

edit

Hello, could you please check in the sources who exibited the portrait at Russborough House? It seems Alferd Beit baught the house after his father's death, so Otto Beit could not be the one? Tremendo (talk) 18:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Italian art people has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Italian art people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 18:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rome Line B

edit

 Template:Rome Line B has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Nervo-Trajanic Dynasty has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Nervo-Trajanic Dynasty has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 04:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian harpsichordists

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian harpsichordists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eurostar WI

edit

 Template:Eurostar WI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 12:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:AlmaTadema-LauraTheresaEpps.jpg

edit
 

The file File:AlmaTadema-LauraTheresaEpps.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Better alternative available on commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lisa Greenwood (actor)

edit
 

The article Lisa Greenwood (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 03:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:FrenchArmyTree

edit

 Template:FrenchArmyTree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Godwin family tree

edit

 Template:Godwin family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 09:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Callichore (mythology)

edit
 

The article Callichore (mythology) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One reference to an alleged scholion to Hesiod does not an article make. David Falkner's The Mythology of the Night Sky (2020) actually points out that there are no mythological references to this name and suggests it might be related to Terpsichore. Suggest deleting the page and adding a reference to Callichore under the Terpsichore page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kazamzam (talk) 22:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Baroque architecture in the United States

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Baroque architecture in the United States indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Callao Roads" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Callao Roads and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 26#Callao Roads until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Grosvenor Place

edit
 

The article Grosvenor Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources, simple listing of where a street runs does not make it notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:London 25th&26th Feb and Lichfield 4th Mar 399.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:London 25th&26th Feb and Lichfield 4th Mar 399.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have been pruned from a list

edit

Hi Neddyseagoon! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Monasteries in Russia by region has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Monasteries in Russia by region has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Churches in Russia by region has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Churches in Russia by region has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Study of ancient Rome has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Study of ancient Rome has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Belgian Roman Catholic abbesses

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Belgian Roman Catholic abbesses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Armée de Hollande" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Armée de Hollande and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#Armée de Hollande until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Churches in Rhône (department)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Churches in Rhône (department) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Memoirs of Hadrian.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Memoirs of Hadrian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:French architecture outside France has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:French architecture outside France has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Privybst (talk) 07:10, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Geelvincktree

edit

 Template:Geelvincktree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Emdrup Church

edit

I have nominated Emdrup Church for deletion. This is non-notable building. A Google search (in English) for additional information only returns the church's own web site and Wikipedia. The church fails WP:NGEO in terms of significant coverage. 217.42.50.155 (talk) 23:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Emdrup Church for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emdrup Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emdrup Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Qwaiiplayer (talk) 03:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Parishes of Europe has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Parishes of Europe has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Parishes of North America has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Parishes of North America has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:14, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Parishes of South America has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Parishes of South America has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

wrong redirect from Tobolsk province to Tobolsk Governorate

edit

Hello, you have made wrong redirect from Tobolsk province https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4459143 to Tobolsk Governorate https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1540322 which is mentioned in the infobox of Tobolsk Viceroyalty.

Whould you pls revert it ?

Thank you

EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 00:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vere Street, Camden

edit
 

The article Vere Street, Camden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As discussed during RM, this page may best be deleted, due to lack of notability and references. Doesn't even have any inline sources!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Victorian prime ministers

edit

 Template:Victorian prime ministers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 06:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Baroque architecture in the Ottoman Empire has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Baroque architecture in the Ottoman Empire has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Great Hetmans of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Great Hetmans of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcelus (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of National Film Actors' Theatre for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Film Actors' Theatre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Film Actors' Theatre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Medarduss (talk) 20:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Michael Bauer (Anthroposophy)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Michael Bauer (Anthroposophy) and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11 § Michael Bauer (Anthroposophy) until a consensus is reached. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Historians of philosophy by field of study has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Historians of philosophy by field of study has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Finnish hydrographers has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Finnish hydrographers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of East Bromwich

edit
 

The article East Bromwich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Romanian salon-holders

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Romanian salon-holders indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Baroque architecture in Silesia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Baroque architecture in Silesia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Italian art institutions has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Italian art institutions has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Doverromanpaintedhouse2.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doverromanpaintedhouse2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bohemian people by district

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Bohemian people by district indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bohemian people by region

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Bohemian people by region indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Austrian knights has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Austrian knights has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:British people of the Thirty Years' War has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:British people of the Thirty Years' War has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Polish people of the Thirty Years' War has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Polish people of the Thirty Years' War has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jonathan Christie for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Christie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Christie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

zoglophie 13:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bishops of Gibraltar has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Bishops of Gibraltar has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:19th-century German Christian theologians

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:19th-century German Christian theologians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rome church

edit

 Template:Rome church has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Mellon collection" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Mellon collection has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 7 § Mellon collection until a consensus is reached. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ancient Chinese military engineers

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Ancient Chinese military engineers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Archaeological museums in England by city has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Archaeological museums in England by city has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Declan O'Dwyer (director)

edit
 

The article Declan O'Dwyer (director) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Neddyseagoon. Thank you for your work on Yellow Palace. User:Slgrandson, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Facebook is not acceptable for sourcing, and the last bit of text needs to be cited.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slgrandson}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 21:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Parisstreetcat2

edit

 Template:Parisstreetcat2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bohemian people by period has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Bohemian people by period has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bohemian people by city or town has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Bohemian people by city or town has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Berber clockmakers

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Berber clockmakers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Regency Bill" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Regency Bill has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 7 § Regency Bill until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) 14:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Regency Bill" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Regency Bill has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 7 § Regency Bill until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) 14:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 31 § Treasure troves by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. + Qwerfjkltalk 17:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ancient Chinese military engineers

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Ancient Chinese military engineers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 12:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Latin-language Christian hymns has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Latin-language Christian hymns has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 17:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Austrian world record holders has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Austrian world record holders has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dutchy45 (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kingdom of the Two Sicilies people has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Kingdom of the Two Sicilies people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 17:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Military doctors by country has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Military doctors by country has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Roman patricians has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Roman patricians has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:British military personnel killed in action by nationality has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:British military personnel killed in action by nationality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:British Christians by constituent country has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:British Christians by constituent country has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Armée du portugal" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Armée du portugal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § Armée du portugal until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 08:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Armée d'Andalousie" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Armée d'Andalousie has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § Armée d'Andalousie until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 08:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Armée d'Arragon" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Armée d'Arragon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § Armée d'Arragon until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 08:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Armée de Catalogne" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Armée de Catalogne has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § Armée de Catalogne until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 08:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Armée d'Espagne" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Armée d'Espagne has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § Armée d'Espagne until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 08:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Christian abbots by nationality

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian abbots by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 13:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bohemian people by century has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Bohemian people by century has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Dictionnaire administratif et historique des rues de Paris et de ses monuments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article that only has link to editions of the subject. The sole source in the French version of this article has nothing to do with the subject. Online search only returned trivial mentions of the subject. Does not seem to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:People of the Patriottentijd has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:People of the Patriottentijd has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Demolished Christian monasteries has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Demolished Christian monasteries has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Demolished Christian monasteries by country has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Demolished Christian monasteries by country has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional ships by type has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Fictional ships by type has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 11:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of John Robinson (17th century)

edit
 

The article John Robinson (17th century) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Not worth a redirect as title very ambiguous . Not worth merge as it has sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 10:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Officier d'épée

edit
 

The article Officier d'épée has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tooncool64 (talk) 00:38, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Officier d'épée for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Officier d'épée is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Officier d'épée until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tooncool64 (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Austrian Empire military personnel of the French Revolutionary Wars has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Austrian Empire military personnel of the French Revolutionary Wars has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lucien de Montagnac for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucien de Montagnac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucien de Montagnac until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mason (talk) 02:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Chapels in Aruba has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Chapels in Aruba has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Latin panegyrists has been nominated for splitting

edit
 

Category:Latin panegyrists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Uzès family has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Uzès family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 6 § Category:Chapels in Taiwan on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Greca (given name)

edit
 

The article Greca (given name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails WP:NNAME.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Western philosophy by country has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Western philosophy by country has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Via Traiana (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Via Traiana (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation is not required. "Via Traiana Nova" is specifically not known as "Via Traiana"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of John of Ibelin (died after 1250) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John of Ibelin (died after 1250) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John of Ibelin (died after 1250) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 03:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Breton historians has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Breton historians has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Treasure troves in South Korea has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Treasure troves in South Korea has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. toobigtokale (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:13th-century Spanish sculptors

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:13th-century Spanish sculptors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Serbian watercolourists

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Serbian watercolourists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Armenian romantic painters

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Armenian romantic painters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marnix van den Broeke for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marnix van den Broeke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marnix van den Broeke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 17:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Watercolourists from the Ottoman Empire

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Watercolourists from the Ottoman Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Battles involving the Medes has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Battles involving the Medes has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Malian warriors

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Malian warriors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Austrian clockmakers

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Austrian clockmakers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lindsay of Evelix for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lindsay of Evelix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay of Evelix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rusalkii (talk) 04:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:12th-century Spanish sculptors has been nominated for splitting

edit
 

Category:12th-century Spanish sculptors has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Romans from Africa has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Romans from Africa has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Operetta librettists by nationality has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Operetta librettists by nationality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Oratorio and passion librettists by nationality has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Oratorio and passion librettists by nationality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Futurist photographers has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Futurist photographers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Futurist photography has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Futurist photography has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Artists' models of ancient Greece

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Artists' models of ancient Greece indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:18th-century German Jewish theologians has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:18th-century German Jewish theologians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections

edit
 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ham II (talk) 07:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Dutch people of the Eighty Years' War (Spanish Empire) has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Dutch people of the Eighty Years' War (Spanish Empire) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ben Aldridge (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ben Aldridge (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:British military personnel of the Nine Years' War has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:British military personnel of the Nine Years' War has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:British military personnel killed in action in the Nine Years' War has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:British military personnel killed in action in the Nine Years' War has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Warriors of Central and South America has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Warriors of Central and South America has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 16:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cultural depictions of British prime ministers has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Cultural depictions of British prime ministers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:18th-century Carniolan painters has been nominated for splitting

edit
 

Category:18th-century Carniolan painters has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Abbots from the British Isles has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Abbots from the British Isles has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Christian abbots by nationality

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian abbots by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 13:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ambassadors of the Netherlands to Sweden

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Ambassadors of the Netherlands to Sweden indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 15:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military history of the United Kingdom by region

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Military history of the United Kingdom by region indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:People associated with the Livonian Order has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:People associated with the Livonian Order has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of St Mark's Church, Beckton

edit
 

The article St Mark's Church, Beckton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No inherent notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Penelope Nice

edit
 

The article Penelope Nice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable individual

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 01:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Roman Catholic churches in the London Borough of Bromley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ulrich Schulte-Wülwer

edit
 

The article Ulrich Schulte-Wülwer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No inline citations; uncertain notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Francesco d'Aquino, Prince of Caramanico moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Francesco d'Aquino, Prince of Caramanico. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 01:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Louis Chollet

edit
 

The article Louis Chollet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article about non-notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lycée naval for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lycée naval is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lycée naval until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Hornblower characters has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Hornblower characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Irish Assyriologists

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Irish Assyriologists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 09:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply