Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odbrana (tactical defense system)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 06:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Odbrana (tactical defense system)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted by PROD and then shortly after restored. Original reason was on notability grounds. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; fails our notability requirements. bobrayner (talk) 09:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to Vladimir Djordjevic (martial artist). I had previously tried to cut out the hype, but removing it all would leave a blank page. bobrayner (talk) 00:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't meet WP:GNG. A search for coverage in reliable sources turned up nothing. Almost certainly the result of paid editing. SmartSE (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I PRODed both these articles after looking for sources and I also agree that Vladimir Djordjevic (martial artist) is completely non-notable. SmartSE (talk) 20:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page because they are closely related and part of the same PROD/dePROD cycle.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC):[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both Articles are about a non-notable martial art and its founder. Nothing shows that either of them meet WP:MANOTE or have the significant independent coverage required by WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 22:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both - I can't find enough to substantiate the notability of either subject. Stalwart111 07:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both - I suspect that there has been some paid editing at work when you review the history of contributors. Shritwod (talk) 13:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict)That's more than likely! The editor who challenged the PRODs and who added links to these articles just happens to have a username that is the same as one of Đorđević's 'other names' listed in the infobox and also designed the logo for Odbrana. Is it snowing yet? SmartSE (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both I did find a few mentioning of him i some Serbian papers but still to little to be said and even then only about something called Real Aikido but even in serbian papers there is no mentioning of Odbrana. Seeing how this page gets deleted and born over and over faster than Felix I am with Shritwod on this. It looks to much like a "paid" editing. If they atleast could add something to the article instead of just putting on thesame one over and over after it gets deleted.Stepojevac (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article was clearly created for promotional reasons. 23 editor (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both These sources are not reliable and this seems promotional to say the least. --PDX er1 (talk) 22:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.