Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paniko Gham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 00:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paniko Gham

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NBOOK and a lack of significant coverage. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 00:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Nepal. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 00:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - insufficient coverage to meet the relevant notability guideline. Only one article and not of significance. Such-change47 (talk) 11:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - convinced by other editors that this book satisfies WP:NBOOK and so my ground for deletion no longer valid. Such-change47 (talk) 02:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Fade258 (talk) 07:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the book satisfies the second criteria of WP:BK. (The book has won a major literary award.) Wallflowernepal (talk) 10:15, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technically WP:BKCRIT says "A book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the criteria" - so yes will it might have one an award (one of the criteria) it still must meet WP:GNG as winning an award is only an indicator not definer of notability. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 08:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes c#2 of NBOOK. Lil-unique1 "Presumed notable" means "presumed to pass the GNG", that's community consensus. You need to make a case why that presumption should not apply. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 02:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:NBOOK as having won a major literary award. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meet WP:NBOOK and is notable to be here in wikipedia. Owlf 📪 18:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.