Dates are inconsistent

Dates are inconsistent

65 results sorted by ID

Possible spell-corrected query: most-compromise security
2024/1625 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-10-11
On the Tight Security of the Double Ratchet
Daniel Collins, Doreen Riepel, Si An Oliver Tran
Cryptographic protocols

The Signal Protocol is a two-party secure messaging protocol used in applications such as Signal, WhatsApp, Google Messages and Facebook Messenger and is used by billions daily. It consists of two core components, one of which is the Double Ratchet protocol that has been the subject of a line of work that aims to understand and formalise exactly what security it provides. Existing models capture strong guarantees including resilience to state exposure in both forward security (protecting...

2024/1454 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-09-17
Interval Key-Encapsulation Mechanism
Alexander Bienstock, Yevgeniy Dodis, Paul Rösler, Daniel Wichs
Public-key cryptography

Forward-Secure Key-Encapsulation Mechanism (FS-KEM; Canetti et al. Eurocrypt 2003) allows Alice to encapsulate a key $k$ to Bob for some time $t$ such that Bob can decapsulate it at any time $t'\leq t$. Crucially, a corruption of Bob's secret key after time $t$ does not reveal $k$. In this work, we generalize and extend this idea by also taking Post-Compromise Security (PCS) into account and call it Interval Key-Encapsulation Mechanism (IKEM). Thus, we do not only protect confidentiality...

2024/1395 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-11-01
A Formal Analysis of Apple’s iMessage PQ3 Protocol
Felix Linker, Ralf Sasse, David Basin
Cryptographic protocols

We present the formal verification of Apple’s iMessage PQ3, a highly performant, device-to-device messaging protocol offering strong security guarantees even against an adversary with quantum computing capabilities. PQ3 leverages Apple’s identity services together with a custom, post-quantum secure initialization phase and afterwards it employs a double ratchet construction in the style of Signal, extended to provide post-quantum, post-compromise security. We present a detailed formal...

2024/914 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-06-07
Compact Key Storage: A Modern Approach to Key Backup and Delegation
Yevgeniy Dodis, Daniel Jost, Antonio Marcedone
Cryptographic protocols

End-to-End (E2E) encrypted messaging, which prevents even the service provider from learning communication contents, is gaining popularity. Since users care about maintaining access to their data even if their devices are lost or broken or just replaced, these systems are often paired with cloud backup solutions: Typically, the user will encrypt their messages with a fixed key, and upload the ciphertexts to the server. Unfortunately, this naive solution has many drawbacks. First, it often...

2024/499 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-03-28
CCA Secure Updatable Encryption from Non-Mappable Group Actions
Jonas Meers, Doreen Riepel
Cryptographic protocols

Ciphertext-independent updatable encryption (UE) allows to rotate encryption keys and update ciphertexts via a token without the need to first download the ciphertexts. Although, syntactically, UE is a symmetric-key primitive, ciphertext-independent UE with forward secrecy and post-compromise security is known to imply public-key encryption (Alamati, Montgomery and Patranabis, CRYPTO 2019). Constructing post-quantum secure UE turns out to be a difficult task. While lattices offer the...

2024/362 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-02-28
Integrating Causality in Messaging Channels
Shan Chen, Marc Fischlin
Cryptographic protocols

Causal reasoning plays an important role in the comprehension of communication, but it has been elusive so far how causality should be properly preserved by instant messaging services. To the best of our knowledge, causality preservation is not even treated as a desired security property by most (if not all) existing secure messaging protocols like Signal. This is probably due to the intuition that causality seems already preserved when all received messages are intact and displayed...

2024/357 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-02-28
Security analysis of the iMessage PQ3 protocol
Douglas Stebila
Cryptographic protocols

The iMessage PQ3 protocol is an end-to-end encrypted messaging protocol designed for exchanging data in long-lived sessions between two devices. It aims to provide classical and post-quantum confidentiality for forward secrecy and post-compromise secrecy, as well as classical authentication. Its initial authenticated key exchange is constructed from digital signatures plus elliptic curve Diffie–Hellman and post-quantum key exchanges; to derive per-message keys on an ongoing basis, it employs...

2023/1903 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-09-23
Quarantined-TreeKEM: a Continuous Group Key Agreement for MLS, Secure in Presence of Inactive Users
Céline Chevalier, Guirec Lebrun, Ange Martinelli, Abdul Rahman Taleb
Cryptographic protocols

The recently standardized secure group messaging protocol Messaging Layer Security (MLS) is designed to ensure asynchronous communications within large groups, with an almost-optimal communication cost and the same security level as point-to-point se- cure messaging protocols such as Signal. In particular, the core sub-protocol of MLS, a Continuous Group Key Agreement (CGKA) called TreeKEM, must generate a common group key that respects the fundamental security properties of post-compromise...

2023/1829 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-12-01
End-to-End Encrypted Zoom Meetings: Proving Security and Strengthening Liveness
Yevgeniy Dodis, Daniel Jost, Balachandar Kesavan, Antonio Marcedone
Cryptographic protocols

In May 2020, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Zoom) announced a multi-step plan to comprehensively support end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) group video calls and subsequently rolled out basic E2EE support to customers in October 2020. In this work we provide the first formal security analysis of Zoom's E2EE protocol, and also lay foundation to the general problem of E2EE group video communication. We observe that the vast security literature analyzing asynchronous messaging does not translate...

2023/1761 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-11-20
Guardianship in Group Key Exchange for Limited Environments
Elsie Mestl Fondevik, Britta Hale, Xisen Tian
Cryptographic protocols

Post-compromise security (PCS) has been a core goal of end-to-end encrypted messaging applications for many years, both in one-to-one continuous key agreement (CKA) and for groups (CGKA). At its essence, PCS relies on a compromised party to perform a key update in order to `self-heal'. However, due to bandwidth constraints, receive-only mode, and various other environmental demands of the growing number of use cases for such CGKA protocols, a group member may not be able to issue such...

2023/1421 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-09-20
Efficient Secure Storage with Version Control and Key Rotation
Long Chen, Hui Guo, Ya-Nan Li, Qiang Tang
Cryptographic protocols

Periodic key rotation is a widely used technique to enhance key compromise resilience. Updatable encryption (UE) schemes provide an efficient approach to key rotation, ensuring post-compromise security for both confidentiality and integrity. However, these UE techniques cannot be directly applied to frequently updated databases due to the risk of a malicious server inducing the client to accept an outdated version of a file instead of the latest one. To address this issue, we propose a...

2023/1385 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-09-15
WhatsUpp with Sender Keys? Analysis, Improvements and Security Proofs
David Balbás, Daniel Collins, Phillip Gajland
Cryptographic protocols

Developing end-to-end encrypted instant messaging solutions for group conversations is an ongoing challenge that has garnered significant attention from practitioners and the cryptographic community alike. Notably, industry-leading messaging apps such as WhatsApp and Signal Messenger have adopted the Sender Keys protocol, where each group member shares their own symmetric encryption key with others. Despite its widespread adoption, Sender Keys has never been formally modelled in the...

2023/1300 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-08-31
Device-Oriented Group Messaging: A Formal Cryptographic Analysis of Matrix’ Core
Martin R. Albrecht, Benjamin Dowling, Daniel Jones
Cryptographic protocols

Focusing on its cryptographic core, we provide the first formal description of the Matrix secure group messaging protocol. Observing that no existing secure messaging model in the literature captures the relationships (and shared state) between users, their devices and the groups they are a part of, we introduce the Device-Oriented Group Messaging model to capture these key characteristics of the Matrix protocol. Utilising our new formalism, we determine that Matrix achieves the basic...

2023/1123 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-12-14
On the Cost of Post-Compromise Security in Concurrent Continuous Group-Key Agreement
Benedikt Auerbach, Miguel Cueto Noval, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Krzysztof Pietrzak
Cryptographic protocols

Continuous Group-Key Agreement (CGKA) allows a group of users to maintain a shared key. It is the fundamental cryptographic primitive underlying group messaging schemes and related protocols, most notably TreeKEM, the underlying key agreement protocol of the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) protocol, a standard for group messaging by the IETF. CKGA works in an asynchronous setting where parties only occasionally must come online, and their messages are relayed by an untrusted server. The...

2023/1053 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-09-05
ASMesh: Anonymous and Secure Messaging in Mesh Networks Using Stronger, Anonymous Double Ratchet
Alexander Bienstock, Paul Rösler, Yi Tang
Cryptographic protocols

The majority of secure messengers have single, centralized service providers that relay ciphertexts between users to enable asynchronous communication. However, in some scenarios such as mass protests in censored networks, relying on a centralized provider is fatal. Mesh messengers attempt to solve this problem by building ad hoc networks in which user clients perform the ciphertext-relaying task. Yet, recent analyses of widely deployed mesh messengers discover severe security weaknesses...

2023/880 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-12-07
On Active Attack Detection in Messaging with Immediate Decryption
Khashayar Barooti, Daniel Collins, Simone Colombo, Loı̈s Huguenin-Dumittan, Serge Vaudenay
Cryptographic protocols

The widely used Signal protocol provides protection against state exposure attacks through forward security (protecting past messages) and post-compromise security (for restoring security). It supports immediate decryption, allowing messages to be re-ordered or dropped at the protocol level without affecting correctness. In this work, we consider strong active attack detection for secure messaging with immediate decryption, where parties are able to immediately detect active attacks under...

2023/228 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-02-20
Authenticated Continuous Key Agreement: Active MitM Detection and Prevention
Benjamin Dowling, Britta Hale
Cryptographic protocols

Current messaging protocols are incapable of detecting active man-in-the-middle threats. Even common continuous key agreement protocols such as Signal, which offers forward secrecy and post-compromise security, are dependent on the adversary being passive immediately following state compromise, and healing guarantees are lost if the attacker is not. This work offers the first solution for detecting active man-in-the-middle attacks on such protocols by extending authentication beyond the...

2022/1732 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-04-18
TreeSync: Authenticated Group Management for Messaging Layer Security
Théophile Wallez, Jonathan Protzenko, Benjamin Beurdouche, Karthikeyan Bhargavan
Cryptographic protocols

Messaging Layer Security (MLS), currently undergoing standardization at the IETF, is an asynchronous group messaging protocol that aims to be efficient for large dynamic groups, while providing strong guarantees like forward secrecy (FS) and post-compromise security (PCS). While prior work on MLS has extensively studied its group key establishment component (called TreeKEM), many flaws in early designs of MLS have stemmed from its group integrity and authentication mechanisms that are not as...

2022/1710 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-08-05
Formal Analysis of Session-Handling in Secure Messaging: Lifting Security from Sessions to Conversations
Cas Cremers, Charlie Jacomme, Aurora Naska
Cryptographic protocols

The building blocks for secure messaging apps, such as Signal’s X3DH and Double Ratchet (DR) protocols, have received a lot of attention from the research community. They have notably been proved to meet strong security properties even in the case of compromise such as Forward Secrecy (FS) and Post-Compromise Security (PCS). However, there is a lack of formal study of these properties at the application level. Whereas the research works have studied such properties in the context of a single...

2022/1691 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-10-15
TokenWeaver: Privacy Preserving and Post-Compromise Secure Attestation
Cas Cremers, Gal Horowitz, Charlie Jacomme, Eyal Ronen
Cryptographic protocols

Modern attestation based on Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) can significantly reduce the risk of secret compromise, allowing users to securely perform sensitive computations such as running cryptographic protocols for authentication across security critical services. However, this has also made TEEs a high-value attack target, driving an arms race between novel compromise attacks and continuous TEEs updates. Ideally, we want to achieve Post-Compromise Security (PCS): even after a...

2022/1531 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-11-07
The Key Lattice Framework for Concurrent Group Messaging
Kelong Cong, Karim Eldefrawy, Nigel P. Smart, Ben Terner
Cryptographic protocols

Today, two-party secure messaging is well-understood and widely adopted on the Internet, e.g., Signal and WhatsApp. Multiparty protocols for secure group messaging on the other hand are less mature and many protocols with different tradeoffs exist. Generally, such protocols require parties to first agree on a shared secret group key and then periodically update it while preserving forward secrecy (FS) and post compromise security (PCS). We present a new framework, called a key lattice,...

2022/1264 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-11-13
Rotatable Zero Knowledge Sets: Post Compromise Secure Auditable Dictionaries with application to Key Transparency
Brian Chen, Yevgeniy Dodis, Esha Ghosh, Eli Goldin, Balachandar Kesavan, Antonio Marcedone, Merry Ember Mou
Cryptographic protocols

Key Transparency (KT) systems allow end-to-end encrypted service providers (messaging, calls, etc.) to maintain an auditable directory of their users’ public keys, producing proofs that all participants have a consistent view of those keys, and allowing each user to check updates to their own keys. KT has lately received a lot of attention, in particular its privacy preserving variants, which also ensure that users and auditors do not learn anything beyond what is necessary to use the...

2022/1237 (PDF) Last updated: 2022-09-18
On the Worst-Case Inefficiency of CGKA
Alexander Bienstock, Yevgeniy Dodis, Sanjam Garg, Garrison Grogan, Mohammad Hajiabadi, Paul Rösler
Cryptographic protocols

Continuous Group Key Agreement (CGKA) is the basis of modern Secure Group Messaging (SGM) protocols. At a high level, a CGKA protocol enables a group of users to continuously compute a shared (evolving) secret while members of the group add new members, remove other existing members, and perform state updates. The state updates allow CGKA to offer desirable security features such as forward secrecy and post-compromise security. CGKA is regarded as a practical primitive in the...

2022/1215 (PDF) Last updated: 2022-09-13
Continuous Authentication in Secure Messaging
Benjamin Dowling, Felix Günther, Alexandre Poirrier
Cryptographic protocols

Secure messaging schemes such as the Signal protocol rely on out-of-band channels to verify the authenticity of long-running communication. Such out-of-band checks however are only rarely actually performed by users in practice. In this paper, we propose a new method for performing continuous authentication during a secure messaging session, without the need for an out-of-band channel. Leveraging the users' long-term secrets, our Authentication Steps extension guarantees authenticity as...

2022/1187 (PDF) Last updated: 2022-09-09
Strongly Anonymous Ratcheted Key Exchange
Benjamin Dowling, Eduard Hauck, Doreen Riepel, Paul Rösler
Cryptographic protocols

Anonymity is an (abstract) security goal that is especially important to threatened user groups. Therefore, widely deployed communication protocols implement various measures to hide different types of information (i.e., metadata) about their users. Before actually defining anonymity, we consider an attack vector about which targeted user groups can feel concerned: continuous, temporary exposure of their secrets. Examples for this attack vector include intentionally planted viruses on...

2022/1090 (PDF) Last updated: 2022-09-05
How fast do you heal? A taxonomy for post-compromise security in secure-channel establishment
Olivier Blazy, Ioana Boureanu, Pascal Lafourcade, Cristina Onete, Léo Robert
Foundations

Post-Compromise Security (PCS) is a property of secure-channel establishment schemes, which limits the security breach of an adversary that has compromised one of the endpoint to a certain number of messages, after which the channel heals. An attractive property, especially in view of Snowden's revelation of mass-surveillance, PCS was pioneered by the Signal messaging protocol, and is present in OTR. In this paper, we introduce a framework for quantifying and comparing PCS security, with...

2022/559 (PDF) Last updated: 2024-07-10
DeCAF: Decentralizable Continuous Group Key Agreement with Fast Healing
Joël Alwen, Benedikt Auerbach, Miguel Cueto Noval, Karen Klein, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Krzysztof Pietrzak
Cryptographic protocols

Continuous group key agreement (CGKA) allows a group of users to maintain a continuously updated shared key in an asynchronous setting where parties only come online sporadically and their messages are relayed by an untrusted server. CGKA captures the basic primitive underlying group messaging schemes. Current solutions including TreeKEM ("Messaging Layer Security'' (MLS) IETF RFC 9420) cannot handle concurrent requests while retaining low communication complexity. The exception being...

2022/486 (PDF) Last updated: 2022-04-23
MARSHAL: Messaging with Asynchronous Ratchets and Signatures for faster HeALing
Olivier Blazy, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Thibaut Jacques, Pascal Lafourcade, Cristina Onete, Léo Robert
Cryptographic protocols

Secure messaging applications are deployed on devices that can be compromised, lost, stolen, or corrupted in many ways. Thus, recovering from attacks to get back to a clean state is essential and known as healing. Signal is a widely-known, privacy-friendly messaging application, that uses key-ratcheting mechanism updates keys at each stage to provide end-to-end channel security, forward secrecy, and post-compromise security. We strengthen this last property, by providing a faster healing. ...

2022/376 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-05-19
Universally Composable End-to-End Secure Messaging
Ran Canetti, Palak Jain, Marika Swanberg, Mayank Varia
Cryptographic protocols

We model and analyze the Signal end-to-end secure messaging protocol within the Universal Composability (UC) framework. Specifically: (1) We formulate an ideal functionality that captures end-to-end secure messaging in a setting with Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and an untrusted server, against an adversary that has full control over the network and can adaptively and momentarily compromise parties at any time, obtaining their entire internal states. Our analysis captures the forward...

2022/311 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-04-20
Unidirectional Updatable Encryption and Proxy Re-encryption from DDH
Peihan Miao, Sikhar Patranabis, Gaven Watson
Cryptographic protocols

Updatable Encryption (UE) and Proxy Re-encryption (PRE) allow re-encrypting a ciphertext from one key to another in the symmetric-key and public-key settings, respectively, without decryption. A longstanding open question has been the following: do unidirectional UE and PRE schemes (where ciphertext re-encryption is permitted in only one direction) necessarily require stronger/more structured assumptions as compared to their bidirectional counterparts? Known constructions of UE and PRE seem...

2022/251 (PDF) Last updated: 2023-07-20
CoCoA: Concurrent Continuous Group Key Agreement
Joël Alwen, Benedikt Auerbach, Miguel Cueto Noval, Karen Klein, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Michael Walter
Cryptographic protocols

Messaging platforms like Signal are widely deployed and provide strong security in an asynchronous setting. It is a challenging problem to construct a protocol with similar security guarantees that can \emph{efficiently} scale to large groups. A major bottleneck are the frequent key rotations users need to perform to achieve post compromise forward security. In current proposals -- most notably in TreeKEM (which is part of the IETF's Messaging Layer Security (MLS) protocol draft) -- for...

2022/046 (PDF) Last updated: 2022-03-09
Membership Privacy for Asynchronous Group Messaging
Keita Emura, Kaisei Kajita, Ryo Nojima, Kazuto Ogawa, Go Ohtake
Cryptographic protocols

The Signal protocol is a secure messaging protocol providing end-to-end encrypted asynchronous communication. In this paper, we focus on a method capable of hiding membership information from the viewpoint of non group members in a secure group messaging (SGM) protocol, which we call "membership privacy''. Although Chase et al. (ACM CCS 2020) have considered the same notion, their proposal is an extension of Signal so called "Pairwise Signal'' where a group message is repeatedly sent over...

2021/1570 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-12-03
Multicast Key Agreement, Revisited
Alexander Bienstock, Yevgeniy Dodis, Yi Tang
Cryptographic protocols

Multicast Key Agreement (MKA) is a long-overlooked natural primitive of large practical interest. In traditional MKA, an omniscient group manager privately distributes secrets over an untrusted network to a dynamically-changing set of group members. The group members are thus able to derive shared group secrets across time, with the main security requirement being that only current group members can derive the current group secret. There indeed exist very efficient MKA schemes in the...

2021/626 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-07-08
Help, my Signal has bad Device! Breaking the Signal Messenger’s Post-CompromiseSecurity through a Malicious Device
Jan Wichelmann, Sebastian Berndt, Claudius Pott, Thomas Eisenbarth
Cryptographic protocols

In response to ongoing discussions about data usage by companies and governments, and its implications for privacy, there is a growing demand for secure communication techniques. While during their advent, most messenger apps focused on features rather than security, this has changed in the recent years: Since then, many have adapted end-to-end encryption as a standard feature. One of the most popular solutions is the Signal messenger, which aims to guarantee forward secrecy (i.e. security...

2021/538 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-04-23
A Composable Look at Updatable Encryption
Françoise Levy-dit-Vehel, Maxime Roméas

Updatable Encryption (UE), as originally defined by Boneh et al. in 2013, addresses the problem of key rotation on outsourced data while maintaining the communication complexity as low as possible. The security definitions for UE schemes have been constantly updated since then. However, the security notion that is best suited for a particular application remains unclear. To solve this problem in the ciphertext-independent setting, we use the Constructive Cryptography (CC) framework defined...

2021/305 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-03-09
SoK: Game-based Security Models for Group Key Exchange
Bertram Poettering, Paul Rösler, Jörg Schwenk, Douglas Stebila
Cryptographic protocols

Group key exchange (GKE) protocols let a group of users jointly establish fresh and secure key material. Many flavors of GKE have been proposed, differentiated by, among others, whether group membership is static or dynamic, whether a single key or a continuous stream of keys is established, and whether security is provided in the presence of state corruptions (forward and post-compromise security). In all cases, an indispensable ingredient to the rigorous analysis of a candidate solution is...

2021/137 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-04-23
Cryptographic Security of the MLS RFC, Draft 11
Chris Brzuska, Eric Cornelissen, Konrad Kohbrok

Cryptographic communication protocols provide confidentiality, integrity and authentication properties for end-to- end communication under strong corruption attacks, including, notably, post-compromise security (PCS). Most protocols are designed for one-to-one communication. Protocols for group communication are less common, less efficient, and tend to provide weaker security guarantees. This is because group communication poses unique challenges, such as coordinated key updates, changes to...

2020/1593 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-10-03
Towards Post-Quantum Updatable Public-Key Encryption via Supersingular Isogenies
Edward Eaton, David Jao, Chelsea Komlo, Youcef Mokrani
Public-key cryptography

We present the first post-quantum secure Key-Updatable Public-Key Encryption (UPKE) construction. UPKE has been proposed as a mechanism to improve the forward secrecy and post-compromise security of secure messaging protocols, but the hardness of all existing constructions rely on discrete logarithm assumptions. We focus our assessment on isogeny-based cryptosystems due to their suitability for performing a potentially unbounded number of update operations, a practical requirement for secure...

2020/1552 (PDF) Last updated: 2020-12-13
Threshold Password-Hardened Encryption Services
Julian Brost, Christoph Egger, Russell W. F. Lai, Fritz Schmid, Dominique Schröder, Markus Zoppelt

Password-hardened encryption (PHE) was introduced by Lai et al. at USENIX 2018 and immediately productized by VirgilSecurity. PHE is a password-based key derivation protocol that involves an oblivious external crypto service for key derivation. The security of PHE protects against offline brute-force attacks, even when the attacker is given the entire database. Furthermore, the crypto service neither learns the derived key nor the password. PHE supports key-rotation meaning that both the...

2020/1452 (PDF) Last updated: 2022-02-15
ASAP: Algorithm Substitution Attacks on Cryptographic Protocols
Sebastian Berndt, Jan Wichelmann, Claudius Pott, Tim-Henrik Traving, Thomas Eisenbarth
Cryptographic protocols

The security of digital communication relies on few cryptographic protocols that are used to protect internet traffic, from web sessions to instant messaging. These protocols and the cryptographic primitives they rely on have been extensively studied and are considered secure. Yet, sophisticated attackers are often able to bypass rather than break security mechanisms. Kleptography or algorithm substitution attacks (ASA) describe techniques to place backdoors right into cryptographic...

2020/1281 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-05-31
Key Agreement for Decentralized Secure Group Messaging with Strong Security Guarantees
Matthew Weidner, Martin Kleppmann, Daniel Hugenroth, Alastair R. Beresford
Cryptographic protocols

Secure group messaging protocols, providing end-to-end encryption for group communication, need to handle mobile devices frequently being offline, group members being added or removed, and the possibility of device compromises during long-lived chat sessions. Existing work targets a centralized network model in which all messages are routed through a single server, which is trusted to provide a consistent total order on updates to the group state. In this paper we adapt secure group...

2020/1171 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-05-19
On the Price of Concurrency in Group Ratcheting Protocols
Alexander Bienstock, Yevgeniy Dodis, Paul Rösler
Cryptographic protocols

Post-Compromise Security, or PCS, refers to the ability of a given protocol to recover—by means of normal protocol operations—from the exposure of local states of its (otherwise honest) participants. While PCS in the two-party setting has attracted a lot of attention recently, the problem of achieving PCS in the group setting—called group ratcheting here—is much less understood. On the one hand, one can achieve excellent security by simply executing, in parallel, a two-party ratcheting...

2020/752 (PDF) Last updated: 2020-06-21
Continuous Group Key Agreement with Active Security
Joël Alwen, Sandro Coretti, Daniel Jost, Marta Mularczyk
Cryptographic protocols

A continuous group key agreement (CGKA) protocol allows a long-lived group of parties to agree on a continuous stream of fresh secret key material. The protocol must support constantly changing group membership, make no assumptions about when, if, or for how long members come online, nor rely on any trusted group managers. Due to sessions' long life-time, CGKA protocols must simultaneously ensure both post-compromise security and forward secrecy (PCFS). That is, current key material should...

2020/541 (PDF) Last updated: 2020-06-05
There Can Be No Compromise: The Necessity of Ratcheted Authentication in Secure Messaging
Benjamin Dowling, Britta Hale
Cryptographic protocols

Modern messaging applications often rely on out-of-band communication to achieve entity authentication, with human users actively verifying and attesting to long-term public keys. This "user-mediated" authentication is done primarily to reduce reliance on trusted third parties by replacing that role with the user. Despite a great deal of research focusing on analyzing the confidentiality aspect of secure messaging, the authenticity aspect of it has been largely assumed away. Consequently,...

2020/099 (PDF) Last updated: 2020-02-04
Many a Mickle Makes a Muckle: A Framework for Provably Quantum-Secure Hybrid Key Exchange
Benjamin Dowling, Torben Brandt Hansen, Kenneth G. Paterson
Cryptographic protocols

Hybrid Authenticated Key Exchange (AKE) protocols combine keying material from different sources (post-quantum, classical, and quantum key distribution (QKD)) to build protocols that are resilient to catastrophic failures of the different components. These failures may be due to advances in quantum computing, implementation vulnerabilities, or our evolving understanding of the quantum (and even classical) security of supposedly quantum-secure primitives. This hybrid approach is a prime...

2019/1489 (PDF) Last updated: 2020-10-20
Keep the Dirt: Tainted TreeKEM, Adaptively and Actively Secure Continuous Group Key Agreement
Joël Alwen, Margarita Capretto, Miguel Cueto, Chethan Kamath, Karen Klein, Ilia Markov, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Krzysztof Pietrzak, Michael Walter, Michelle Yeo
Cryptographic protocols

While messaging systems with strong security guarantees are widely used in practice, designing a protocol that scales efficiently to large groups and enjoys similar security guarantees remains largely open. The two existing proposals to date are ART (Cohn-Gordon et al., CCS18) and TreeKEM (IETF, The Messaging Layer Security Protocol, draft). TreeKEM is the currently considered candidate by the IETF MLS working group, but dynamic group operations (i.e. adding and removing users) can cause...

2019/1275 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-11-05
Updatable Oblivious Key Management for Storage Systems
Stanislaw Jarecki, Hugo Krawczyk, Jason Resch
Cryptographic protocols

We introduce Oblivious Key Management Systems (KMS) as a more secure alternative to traditional wrapping-based KMS that form the backbone of key management in large-scale data storage deployments. The new system, that builds on Oblivious Pseudorandom Functions (OPRF), hides keys and object identifiers from the KMS, offers unconditional security for key transport, provides key verifiability, reduces storage, and more. Further, we show how to provide all these features in a distributed...

2019/1189 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-10-15
Security Analysis and Improvements for the IETF MLS Standard for Group Messaging
Joël Alwen, Sandro Coretti, Yevgeniy Dodis, Yiannis Tselekounis
Cryptographic protocols

Secure messaging (SM) protocols allow users to communicate securely over untrusted infrastructure. In contrast to most other secure communication protocols (such as TLS, SSH, or Wireguard), SM sessions may be long-lived (e.g., years) and highly asynchronous. In order to deal with likely state compromises of users during the lifetime of a session, SM protocols do not only protect authenticity and privacy, but they also guarantee forward secrecy (FS) and post-compromise security (PCS). The...

2019/965 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-05-10
Beyond Security and Efficiency: On-Demand Ratcheting with Security Awareness
Andrea Caforio, F Betül Durak, Serge Vaudenay
Cryptographic protocols

Secure asynchronous two-party communication applies ratcheting to strengthen privacy, in the presence of internal state exposures. Security with ratcheting is provided in two forms: forward security and post-compromise security. There have been several such secure protocols proposed in the last few years. However, they come with a high cost. In this paper, we propose two generic constructions with favorable properties. Concretely, our first construction achieves security awareness. It...

2019/608 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-08-12
Symmetric Primitives with Structured Secrets
Navid Alamati, Hart Montgomery, Sikhar Patranabis
Foundations

Securely managing encrypted data on an untrusted party is a challenging problem that has motivated the study of a variety of cryptographic primitives. A special class of such primitives allows an untrusted party to transform a ciphertext encrypted under one key to a ciphertext under another key, using some auxiliary information that does not leak the underlying data. Prominent examples of such primitives in the symmetric-key setting are key-homomorphic PRFs, updatable encryption, and proxy...

2019/477 (PDF) Last updated: 2021-07-01
The Complexities of Healing in Secure Group Messaging: Why Cross-Group Effects Matter
Cas Cremers, Britta Hale, Konrad Kohbrok
Cryptographic protocols

Modern secure messaging protocols can offer strong security guarantees such as Post-Compromise Security (PCS), which enables participants to heal after compromise. The core PCS mechanism in protocols like Signal is designed for pairwise communication, making it inefficient for large groups, while recently proposed designs for secure group messaging, ART, IETF's MLS Draft-11/TreeKEM, use group keys derived from tree structures to efficiently provide PCS to large groups. Until now, research on...

2019/368 (PDF) Last updated: 2020-04-09
Strong Post-Compromise Secure Proxy Re-Encryption
Alex Davidson, Amit Deo, Ela Lee, Keith Martin
Public-key cryptography

Proxy Re-Encryption (PRE), introduced by Bellare et. al, allows a ciphertext encrypted using a key pki to be re-encrypted by a third party so that it is an encryption of the same message under a new key pkj , without revealing the message. Post-Compromise Security (PCS) was first introduced for messaging protocols, and ensures that a ciphertext remains confidential even when past keys have been corrupted. We define PCS in the context of PRE, which ensures that an adversary cannot distinguish...

2019/367 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-04-11
SAID: Reshaping Signal into an Identity-Based Asynchronous Messaging Protocol with Authenticated Ratcheting
Olivier Blazy, Angèle Bossuat, Xavier Bultel, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Cristina Onete, Elena Pagnin
Cryptographic protocols

As messaging applications are becoming increasingly popular, it is of utmost importance to analyze their security and mitigate existing weaknesses. This paper focuses on one of the most acclaimed messaging applications: Signal. Signal is a protocol that provides end-to-end channel security, forward secrecy, and post-compromise security. These features are achieved thanks to a key-ratcheting mechanism that updates the key material at every message. Due to its high security impact, Signal's...

2019/088 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-01-28
Continuous Key Agreement with Reduced Bandwidth
Nir Drucker, Shay Gueron

Continuous Key Agreement (CKA) is a two-party procedure used by Double Ratchet protocols (e. g., Signal). This is a continuous and synchronous protocol that generates a fresh key for every sent/received message. It guarantees forward secrecy and Post-Compromise Security (PCS). PCS allows for reestablishing the security within a few rounds after the state of one of the parties has been compromised. Alwen et al. have recently proposed a new KEM-based CKA construction where every message...

2019/028 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-01-15
nQUIC: Noise-Based QUIC Packet Protection
Mathias Hall-Andersen, David Wong, Nick Sullivan, Alishah Chator
Cryptographic protocols

We present nQUIC, a variant of QUIC-TLS that uses the Noise protocol framework for its key exchange and basis of its packet protector with no semantic transport changes. nQUIC is designed for deployment in systems and for applications that assert trust in raw public keys rather than PKI-based certificate chains. It uses a fixed key exchange algorithm, compromising agility for implementation and verification ease. nQUIC provides mandatory server and optional client authentication, resistance...

2018/1037 (PDF) Last updated: 2020-02-21
The Double Ratchet: Security Notions, Proofs, and Modularization for the Signal Protocol
Joël Alwen, Sandro Coretti, Yevgeniy Dodis
Cryptographic protocols

Signal is a famous secure messaging protocol used by billions of people, by virtue of many secure text messaging applications including Signal itself, WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Skype, and Google Allo. At its core it uses the concept of "double ratcheting," where every message is encrypted and authenticated using a fresh symmetric key; it has many attractive properties, such as forward security, post-compromise security, and "immediate (no-delay) decryption," which had never been achieved...

2018/889 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-09-11
Bidirectional Asynchronous Ratcheted Key Agreement with Linear Complexity
F. Betül Durak, Serge Vaudenay
Cryptographic protocols

Following up mass surveillance and privacy issues, modern secure communication protocols now seek more security such as forward secrecy and post-compromise security. They cannot rely on an assumption such as synchronization, predictable sender/receiver roles, or online availability. Ratcheting was introduced to address forward secrecy and post-compromise security in real-world messaging protocols. At CSF 2016 and CRYPTO 2017, ratcheting was studied either without zero round-trip time (0-RTT)...

2018/296 (PDF) Last updated: 2018-06-08
Asynchronous ratcheted key exchange
Bertram Poettering, Paul Rösler
Cryptographic protocols

Ratcheted key exchange (RKE) is a cryptographic technique used in instant messaging systems like Signal and the WhatsApp messenger for attaining strong security in the face of state exposure attacks. RKE received academic attention in the recent works of Cohn-Gordon et al. (EuroS&P 2017) and Bellare et al. (CRYPTO 2017). While the former is analytical in the sense that it aims primarily at assessing the security that one particular protocol does achieve (which might be weaker than the notion...

2018/118 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-12-19
Updatable Encryption with Post-Compromise Security
Anja Lehmann, Bjoern Tackmann

An updatable encryption scheme allows to periodically rotate the encryption key and move already existing ciphertexts from the old to the new key. These ciphertext updates are done with the help of a so-called update token and can be performed by an untrusted party, as the update never decrypts the data. Updatable encryption is particularly useful in settings where encrypted data is outsourced, e.g., stored on a cloud server. The data owner can produce an update token, and the cloud server...

2017/666 (PDF) Last updated: 2020-03-02
On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security Guarantees
Katriel Cohn-Gordon, Cas Cremers, Luke Garratt, Jon Millican, Kevin Milner
Cryptographic protocols

In the past few years secure messaging has become mainstream, with over a billion active users of end-to-end encryption protocols through apps such as WhatsApp, Signal, Facebook Messenger, Google Allo, Wire and many more. While these users' two-party communications now enjoy very strong security guarantees, it turns out that many of these apps provide, without notifying the users, a weaker property for group messaging: an adversary who compromises a single group member can...

2017/485 (PDF) Last updated: 2017-05-31
Authenticating compromisable storage systems
Jiangshan Yu, Mark Ryan, Liqun Chen
Cryptographic protocols

A service may be implemented over several servers, and those servers may become compromised by an attacker, e.g. through software vulnerabilities. When this happens, the service manager will remove the vulnerabilities and re-instate the server. Typically, this will involve regenerating the public key by which clients authenticate the service, and revoking the old one. This paper presents a scheme which allows a storage service composed of several servers to create a group public key in a...

2016/1013 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-07-04
A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol
Katriel Cohn-Gordon, Cas Cremers, Benjamin Dowling, Luke Garratt, Douglas Stebila
Cryptographic protocols

The Signal protocol is a cryptographic messaging protocol that provides end-to-end encryption for instant messaging in WhatsApp, Wire, and Facebook Messenger among many others, serving well over 1 billion active users. Signal includes several uncommon security properties (such as "future secrecy" or "post-compromise security"), enabled by a novel technique called *ratcheting* in which session keys are updated with every message sent. We conduct a formal security analysis of Signal's...

2016/221 (PDF) Last updated: 2019-10-16
Post-Compromise Security
Katriel Cohn-Gordon, Cas Cremers, Luke Garratt

In this work we study communication with a party whose secrets have already been compromised. At first sight, it may seem impossible to provide any type of security in this scenario. However, under some conditions, practically relevant guarantees can still be achieved. We call such guarantees ``post-compromise security''. We provide the first informal and formal definitions for post-compromise security, and show that it can be achieved in several scenarios. At a technical level, we...

2015/486 (PDF) Last updated: 2017-10-02
DECIM: Detecting Endpoint Compromise In Messaging
Jiangshan Yu, Mark Ryan, Cas Cremers

We present DECIM, an approach to solve the challenge of detecting endpoint compromise in messaging. DECIM manages and refreshes encryption/decryption keys in an automatic and transparent way: it makes it necessary for uses of the key to be inserted in an append-only log, which the device owner can interrogate in order to detect misuse. We propose a multi-device messaging protocol that exploits our concept to allow users to detect unauthorised usage of their device keys. It is co-designed...

2007/052 (PDF) (PS) Last updated: 2007-02-21
Forward-Secure Sequential Aggregate Authentication
Di Ma, Gene Tsudik
Applications

Wireless sensors are employed in a wide range of applications. One common feature of most sensor settings is the need to communicate sensed data to some collection point or sink. This communication can be direct (to a mobile collector) or indirect -- via other sensors towards a remote sink. In either case, a sensor might not be able to communicate to a sink at will. Instead it collects data and waits (for a potentially long time) for a signal to upload accumulated data directly. In a...

Note: In order to protect the privacy of readers, eprint.iacr.org does not use cookies or embedded third party content.