Atoms and Nuclei
Atoms and Nuclei
Atoms and Nuclei
Introduction
(1) In 1895, Jean Perin proved that electrons (known as cathode rays that time) are negatively charged.
(2) Shortly thereafter, J. J. Thomson determined charge ( e ) to mass ( m ) ratio of electrons to be of the order of 1011. This meant
m - 11
that of electron is of the order of 10 and that the mass of electron is very small.
e
(3) In 1909, Millikan measured the magnitude of the charge of an electron.
(4) Studies on X-rays, discovered in 1895, resulted in the discovery of radioactivity.
(5) Rutherford’s experiments on radioactivity proved emission of a-particles besides electrons in radioactive radiations. Thus one
more particle was discovered.
(6) In the 19th century, scientists were trying to measure wavelengths of radiations emitted by different gases filled in discharge
tubes using the diffraction grating discovered by Henry Rowland. These wavelengths were found to be discrete and dependent
on the type of gas filled in the discharge tube.
(7) Same time Max Planck presented the photon theory and showed that the black body radiation is discrete. Einstein explained
photoelectric effect using photon theory of light for which he received the Nobel prize.
(8) In 1902, J.J.Thomson proposed the first simple and most primitive model, which considered an atom to be a sphere of
uniform positive charge into which the negatively charged electrons were embedded. This model was like a plum pudding
dotted with raisins and was thus called as 'plum pudding' model of the atom.
With this model he tried to explain the observed spectra of elements.
According to him, the vibrations of electrons would give rise to
electromagnetic energy radiated. He could explain with some success the
process like chemical reaction, radioactivity etc.
This model had many drawbacks. The chief among them are:
(a) Since the weight of an electron is about a thousandth part of a hydrogen
atom, it would mean that a single atom, especially of the heavier elements, would contain many thousand electrons. But
J.J. Thomson himself found that the number of electrons in an atom cannot be greatly different from the atomic weight.
(b) According to this model, hydrogen can give rise to only one spectral line, contrary to the observed fact of several lines.
(c) This model could not explain the large angle scattering of alpha particles by thin metal foils.
Most of the α-particles particles pass through the metal and are undeflected.
Only a very few of them are deflected through as much as 90o or even larger angles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
SRHSS/2010/ ATOMS AND NUCLEI Page 1 of 2 Prepared by:
Sandhya.K
Class XII/PHYSICS
The results of the scattering experiment could not explain the Thomson's atomic model. Hence, Rutherford concluded that:
As most of the α-particles passed undeflected, most of the space inside the atom is empty or hollow.
Some that deflected with large angles show that heavy positively charged body must be present inside the body of the
atom, which repelled the like charge of the α-particles. This heavy, positively charged body was named as nucleus.
The number of heavy positively charged particles that undergo deflection is very small. The volume occupied by the
nucleus is very small compared to the volume of the atom.
When heavy particles like the α-particles get deflected, the nucleus of the atom must also have an appreciable mass.
The effective volume of the nucleus is extremely small as compared to the effective volume of the atom. The volume
-12
occupied by the nucleus is about 10 times the volume of the atom.
• . The volume occupied by the nucleus is about 10-12 times the volume of the atom.
• Since each atom is electrically neutral, the number of positive charges in the nucleus of an atom is equal to the number of
electrons in it.
Rutherford's model of an atom
Rutherford's model suffered some drawback, as it could not explain the stability of the
atom in-spite of the revolving electrons around the nucleus. The moving electrons should
emit radiations and lose energy. They should slow down, gradually move towards the
nucleus, follow a spiral path and then fall into the nucleus. This would make the atom
collapse and hence unstable, which is not true.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
SRHSS/2010/ ATOMS AND NUCLEI Page 2 of 2 Prepared by:
Sandhya.K