Team Cohesion in Water Polo
Team Cohesion in Water Polo
Team Cohesion in Water Polo
IN WATER POLO
Introduction
Literature Review
Barriers to team cohesion
GEQ
Methodology
Results
Discussion
Applied Implications
Summary
Acknowledgment
References
Task
Cohesion Social
Cohesion
-stick together
-like and enjoy
spending time
-specific & together
identifiable goal
Carron, 1982
Clash of personalities
Breakdown in communication
Disagreement on goals/objective
Age: 19-21
8
Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009
RESULTS
Attraction Group Group
Attraction to
Group/ to group- integration- integration-
group-social
Name task task social
Ath1 19 10 21 28
Ath2 15 25 19 22
Ath3 16 23 23 18
Ath4 12 12 27 24
Ath5 13 17 31 17
Ath6 17 36 31 32
Ath7 12 13 25 24
Ath8 13 15 28 14
Ath9 16 7 21 11
Ath10 16 9 29 23
Ath11 17 19 21 19 9
GEQ Results
40
35
30
25
Attraction to group-task
Score
20
Attraction to group-social
Group integration-task
Group integration-social
15
10
0
Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11
Athlete
Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 10
Attraction to group-task
35
30
25
Score
20 19
16 17 16 16 17
15 15
12 13 12 13
10
5
0
Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11
Athlete
Attraction to group-social
45
40
35 36
30
Score
25 25
23
20 19
15 17
15
12 13
10 10 9
5 7
0
Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11
Athlete 11
Group integration-task
45
40
35
30 31 31
Score 28 29
27
25 25
23
20 21 21 21
19
15
10
5
0
Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11
Athlete
Group integration-social
35
32
30
28
25 24 24
22 23
Score
20 19
18 17
15 14
10 11
5
0
Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11
Athlete 12
DISCUSSION
•Group integration social and task is better
Coach
Member