INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Teacher III Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SPNHS-Division of Calbayog City Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY: 2018-2019

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic KRA 1: 1. Applied knowledge June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No acceptable
Education Content of content within and March 2019 of of content and its of content and its of content and its evidence was
Services Knowledge across curriculum content and its integration within integration within integration within shown
integration and across subject and across subject and across subject
and Pedagogy teaching areas. within and areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
across subject MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
areas as shown of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7

Page 1
Basic 1. Applied knowledge June 2018 to 7.50%
Education of content within and March 2019
Services across curriculum
teaching areas.

Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons least 1 lessons evidence was
using MOV 1 using MOV 1 using MOV 1 using MOV 1 shown
and supported and supported and supported and supported
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the
other given other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
2. Used a range of June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
teaching strategies March 2019 different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
that enhance learner strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading,
achievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and nemeracy skills as nemeracy skills as nemeracy skills as nemeracy skills as
numeracy skills. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted atleast 4 Submitted atleast 3 Submitted atleast 2 Submitted atleast 1 No acceptable
learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
and supported by and supported by and supported by and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness

Page 2
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

3. Applied a range of June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
teaching strategies March 2019 teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
to develop critical strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative
thinking, as well as thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other higher- order other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
thinking skills. shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons least 1 lessons evidence was
as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Page 3
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic KRA 2: 4. Managed June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education Learning classroom structure March 2019 management management management management evidence was
Services Environment to engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
and Diversity individually or in in in in in
of Learners groups, in activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
meaningful as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
exploration, MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
discovery and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons least 1 lessons evidence was
supported by supported by supported by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Page 4
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

5. Managed learner June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
behavior March 2019 management management management management evidence was
constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of shown
learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior
applying positive and that promote that promote that promote that promote
non-violent discipline positive and positive and positive and positive and
to ensure learning- non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
focused discipline as discipline as discipline as discipline as
environments. shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the evidence was
given strategies given strategies given strategies given strategies shown
as observed in at as observed in at as observed in at as observed in at
least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1
lessons lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness

Page 5
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

6. Used June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
differentiated, March 2019 differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
developmentally teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
appropriate learning address learner address learner address learner address learner
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
address learners’ shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
gender, needs, 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
strengths, interests of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
and experiences.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

least 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
differentiated teaching teaching teaching shown
teaching strategies in at strategies in at strategies in at
strategies in at least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 2 lessons
least 2 lessons as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by
as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and supported by supported by supported by
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other other other
other acceptable acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Page 6
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic KRA 3: 7. Planned, June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Education Curriculum managed and March 2019 implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services Planning implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning learning learning learning
and learning process as shown in process as shown in process as shown process as shown
processes to meet MOV MOV in MOV in MOV
curriculum 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
requirements and of 7 of 7 of 7 of 7
varied teaching
contexts.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning learning learning
learning process as process as process as
process as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by supported by
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given other given
other given MOV MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Page 7
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

8. Participated in June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
collegial discussions March 2019 participated in participated in participated in participated in evidence was
that use teacher and LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ shown
meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to
learner feedback to discuss discuss discuss discuss
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
practice. feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Participated in Participated 3 Participated 2 Participated 1 No acceptable

at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence was
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as meetings as shown
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness

Page 8
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

9. Selected, June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
developed, March 2019 used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and used teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
learning learning learning learning
appropriate teaching resources, resources, resources, resources,
and learning including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
resources, including address address address address
ICT, to address learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
learning goals. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable

least 4 varied teaching and teaching and varied evidence was
teaching and learning learning teaching and shown
learning resources, resources, learning
resources, including ICT, including ICT, resources,
including ICT, as evidently as evidently including ICT,
as evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported shown in MOV
1 and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the 1 and supported
by any 1 of the acceptable acceptable by any 1 of the
acceptable MOV MOV acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness

Page 9
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic KRA 4: 10. Designed, June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable
Education Assessment selected, organized March 2019 selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was
Services and Reporting and used diagnostic, organized and organized and organized and organized and shown
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies consistent strategies strategies strategies strategies
with curriculum consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
requirements. curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 varied No acceptable

least 4 varied assessment assessment assessment evidence was
assessment tools as tools as tools as shown
tools as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the acceptable acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Page 10
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

11. Monitored and June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
evaluated learner March 2019 monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and evidence was
progress and evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated shown
learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress
achievement using and and and and
learner attainment achievement achievement achievement achievement
data. using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable

combination of combination of combination of combination of evidence was
at least 4 of the at least 4 of the at least 4 of the at least 4 of the shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted
MOV MOV MOV MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1
quarters quarters quarters quarter

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Page 11
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

12. Communicated June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
promptly and clearly March 2019 showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt evidence was
the learners’ needs, and clear and clear and clear and clear shown
communication communication communication communication
progress and of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
achievement to key needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
stakeholders, and and and and
including achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
parents/guardians. key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a

combination of combination of 3 of combination of 2 of combination of 1 of
at least 4 of the the the the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Page 12
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic KRA 5: Plus 13. Performed June 2018 to 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
Education Factor various related March 2019 performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services works/activities that various related various related various related various related shown
work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities
contribute to the that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
teaching-learning to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
process. learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 different different different different evidence was
kinds of kinds of kinds of kinds of shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
OVERAL RATING FO

ADJECTIVAL RAT

REMIROSE DOANN G. YU NELIN L. ACOBA

Ratee Rater

Page 13
 TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4.5 5 4.75 0.35625

Page 14
 4.5 5 4.75 0.35625

RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4.5 5 4.75 0.35625

Page 15
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4.5 5 4.75 0.35625

Page 16
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 5 5 0.375

Page 17
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 5 5 0.375

Page 18
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 5 5 0.375

Page 19
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 5 5 0.375

Page 20
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 5 5 0.375

Page 21
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 5 5 0.375

Page 22
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 5 4.5 0.3375

Page 23
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 2 5 4 0.3

Page 24
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 5 5 5 0.375

Page 25
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

5 5 5 0.5

L RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.831

CTIVAL RATING OUTSTANDING

DANILO S. JADULCO
Approving Officer

Page 26
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: JUNE M. ORTIZ Name of Rater: EMELITA H. RICAFO

Position: Master Teacher I Position: SST-III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CCNHS-Division of Calbayog City Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY: 2018-2019

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic KRA 1: 1. Modeled effective June, 2016 7.50% Quality Modeled Modeled Modeled Modeled No acceptable
Education Content applications of to March, effective effective effective effective evidence
Services Knowledge content knowledge 2017 applications of applications of applications of applications of was shown
content content content content
and Pedagogy within and across knowledge knowledge knowledge knowledge
curriculum teaching within and within and within and within and
areas. across across across across
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
teaching areas teaching areas teaching areas teaching areas
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5

Page 27
 curriculum teaching
areas.

Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from
supported by colleagues and colleagues and colleagues and
any 1 of the supported by supported by supported by
other MOV any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
given other MOV other MOV other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
2. Collaborated with June, 2016 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted Proposed action No acceptable
colleagues in the to March, completed and completed action research research with evidence was
conduct and 2017 disseminated action action research with colleagues colleagues shown
research with colleagues
application of with colleagues
research to enrich
knowledge of
content
and pedagogy. Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
least 4 of the of the MOV MOV evidence was
given MOV acceptable shown
MOV

Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period

Page 28
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

3. Developed and June, 2016 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
applied effective to March, effective effective effective effective evidence was
teaching strategies 2017 teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
to promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
promote critical and and creative and creative and creative and creative
creative thinking, as thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well
well as other as other as other as other as other
higherorder higherorder higherorder higherorder higherorder
thinking skills. thinking thinking thinking thinking
skills as shown skills as shown skills as shown skills as shown
in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

more lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the other
other MOV other MOV other MOV MOV given
given given given

Timeliness

Page 29
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with June, 2016 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education Environment colleagues to model to March, management management management management evidence was
Services and and share effective 2017 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
Diversity of techniques in the in in in in
Learners management of activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
classroom structure as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
to engage learners, with a with a with a with a
individually or in rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
groups, in
meaningful
exploration,
discovery
and hands-on Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
activities within a least 4 lessons supported by lessons supported by evidence was
range of physical supported by MOV 1 and any supported by MOV 1 and any shown
learning MOV 1 and any 1 of the other MOV 1 and any 1 of the other
1 of the other acceptable 1 of the other acceptable
environments. acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV MOV

Timeliness

Page 30
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

5. Exhibited effective June, 2016 7.50% Quality Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited No acceptable
and constructive to March, effective and effective and effective and effective and evidence was
behavior 2017 constructive constructive constructive constructive shown
behavior behavior behavior behavior
management skills management management management management
by skills by skills by skills by skills by
applying positive and applying applying applying applying
non-violent discipline positive and positive and positive and positive and
to ensure non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
learningfocused discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
environments. ensure ensure ensure ensure
learningfocused learningfocused learningfocused learningfocused
environments environments environments environments
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5

Efficiency Applied at least Applied at least Applied at least Applied at least No acceptable
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in only 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness

Page 31
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

6. Worked with June, 2016 7.50% Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable
colleagues to share to March, colleagues at colleagues in colleagues in colleagues but evidence was
differentiated, 2017 least in the the school level the department no evidence of shown
district/cluster to share lesson or grade level to sharing with
developmentally level to share share lesson others
appropriate lesson
opportunities to
address learners’
differences in
gender, Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
needs, strengths, least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson, evidence was
interests and as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced by shown
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV either MOV 2 or
experiences. 1 and supported 1 and supported 1 and supported 3 but no
by any by any by any evidence of
acceptable acceptable acceptable sharing with
MOV MOV MOV others

Timeliness

Page 32
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and June, 2016 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Education and Planning applied effective to March, applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
Services strategies in the 2017 strategies strategies strategies strategies shown
showing showing showing showing
planning and developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
management of - sequenced - sequenced - sequenced - sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning learning learning learning
and learning process as process as process as process as
processes to meet shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
curriculum 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
requirements and of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
varied teaching
contexts.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as evidence was
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by shown
MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 shown in MOV any 1 of the
and supported and supported 1 and/or 2 and acceptable
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the supported by MOV
other other any 1 of the
acceptable acceptable other
MOV MOV acceptable
MOV

Timeliness

Page 33
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

8. Reviewed with June, 2016 7.50% Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable
colleagues, teacher to March, collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
and learner feedback 2017 reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of shown
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and
to plan, facilitate and learner learner learner learner
enrich teaching feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
practice. evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of reviews of reviews of review of shown
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and
learner learner learner learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the
supported by supported by supported by acceptable
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Page 34
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

9. Advised and June, 2016 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable
guided to March, advised advised advised colleagues in evidence was
colleagues in the 2017 colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, shown
the selection, the selection, the selection, organization,
selection, organization, organization, organization, development
organization, development development development and appropriate
development and and appropriate and appropriate and appropriate use of teaching
use use of teaching use of teaching use of teaching and learning
of appropriate and learning and learning and learning resources as
teaching and resources as resources as resources as shown in the
learning shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
resources, including MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
ICT, to address
specific learning
goals.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
and learning learning learning learning shown
resources as resources as resources as resource as
evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Page 35
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic KRA 4: 10. Worked June, 2016 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable
Education Assessment collaboratively with to March, reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
Services and Reporting colleagues to review 2017 collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment shown
assessment assessment assessment tools with
the design, selection, tools with tools with tools with colleagues as
organization and use colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as shown in the
of a range of shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
effective MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
diagnostic, formative
and summative
assessment
strategies consistent Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 varied No acceptable
with curriculum least 4 assessment assessment assessment evidence was
requirements. assessment tools as tools as tools as shown
tools as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in any of the in any of the in any of the
in any of the acceptable acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Page 36
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

11. Interpreted June, 2016 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
collaboratively to March, collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated evidence was
monitoring and 2017 with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues shown
in the in the in the in the
evaluation strategies interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
of attainment data to assessment assessment assessment assessment
support learner data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
progress and in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
achievement. submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No acceptable

least 2 different least 3 of the least 2 of the of the MOV evidence was
types of MOV same kind of same kind of shown
MOV MOV

Timeliness

12. Applied skills in June, 2016 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
the effective to March, applied skills in the applied skills in the applied skills in the applied skills in the evidence was
communication of 2017 effective effective effective effective shown
communication communication communication communication
learner needs, of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs
progress and and progress to and progress to and progress to and progress to
achievement to key parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
stakeholders, guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
including shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
parents/guardians. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Page 37
 communication of 2017
learner needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including
parents/guardians.
Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

least 3 of the MOV MOV MOV evidence was
acceptable shown
MOV

Timeliness

Basic KRA 5: Plus 13. Performed June, 2016 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
Education Factor various related to March, performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services works/activities that 2017 special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks shown
and/or and/or and/or and/or
contribute to the assignments as assignments as assignments as assignments as
teaching-learning shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
process. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 different different different different evidence was
kinds of kinds of kinds of kinds of shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
OVERAL RATING FOR

ADJECTIVAL RATIN

Page 38
 Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor RESULTS
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

JUNE M. ORTIZ EMELITA H. RICAFORT

Ratee Rater

Page 39
A H. RICAFORT

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 40
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 41
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 42
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 43
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 44
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 45
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 46
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 47
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 48
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

Page 49
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.3

4 4 4 0.3

Page 50
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

4 4 4 0.4

L RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.000

CTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY

Page 51
 RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.

CALICK D. ARRIETA, Ph. D.

Approving Officer

Page 52
 COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management Teamwork
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development. 1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2. Understands personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and 2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment
takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
5 across the organization.
3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
5
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to 4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
achieve goals. 5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. accomplish organization goals and objectives.

Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation

1. Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and 1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713). 2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service
2. Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the issues and concerns.
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and
5 3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on
5
punctuality, good grooming and communication. DEPED strategies and directions.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs. 5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, will further enhance service delivery.
improve system and help others improve their effectiveness.

Results Focus Innovation

1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing ideas, processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational
organizational needs before personal needs. efficiency).
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating 2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in
terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required.
5 personal productivity to create higher value and results.
3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or
5
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. solutions.
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve unit and organization.
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower 5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness
cost, more efficiently, or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
setting any specific goal.

OVERALL
COMPETENCY 5
RATINGS
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan (Recommended

Strengths Development Needs Developmental Intervention) Timeline Resources Needed

A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Feedback:

NELIN L. ACOBA DANILO S. JADULCO

RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY
 Republic of the Phillippines
Department of Education
Region VIII - Eastern Visayas
Schools Division of Calbayog City
CALBAYOG CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Calbayog City
Quarterly Accomplishment Report
Department: Quarter: SY:

Status of Accomplishment
No. of
KRAs / Objectives Planned to be % of MOVs / Remarks
Target Done Accomplish
done ment
KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
1. Applies knowledge of content within and across 8 8 100%
curriculum teaching areas.
2. Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance 8 8 100%
learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills.

3.Applies a range of teaching strategies to develop

critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher- 8 8 100%
order thinking skills.
KRA 2: Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners

1. Manages classroom structure to engage learners,

individually or in groups in meaningful exploration, 8 8 100%
discovery and hands-on activities within a range of
physical learning environments.

2. Manages learner behavior constructively by applying

positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning- 8 8 100%
focused environments.

3. Uses differentiated, developmentally appropriate

learning experiences to address learners' gender, needs, 8 8 100%
strengths, interests and experiences.
KRA 3: Curriculum Planning
1. Plans, manages and implements developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning processess to meet 8 8 100%
curriculum requirement and varied teaching contexts.

2. Participates in collegial discussions that use teacher 8 8 100%

and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice.

3. Selects, develops, organizes and uses appropriate

teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address 8 8 100%
learning goals.
KRA 4: Assessment and Reporting
1. Designs, selects, organizes, and uses diagnostic,
formative and summative assessment strategies 8 8 100%
consistent with curriculum requirements.
2. Monitors and evaluates learner progress and
achievement using learner attainment data. 8 8 100%

3. Communicates promptly and clearly the learners'

needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, 8 8 100%
including parents/guardians.

KRA 5: Plus Factor

1. Performs various related work/activities that
contribute to the teaching-learning process. 8 8 100%

Prepared by: Checked and found correct:

Teacher I-III Subject Department Head

Noted:
CALICK D. ARRIETA, Ph. D.
Principal I