Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teacher I-Iii
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teacher I-Iii
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teacher I-Iii
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Actual Results Score
Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
KRA QET Satisfactory Q E T Ave
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 3. Applied a range of June 7.5% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No #N/A #### #DIV/0!
Education teaching strategies to 2018 to teaching strategies teaching teaching teaching acceptable
Services develop critical and March that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
creative thinking, as 2019 develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical was shown
well as other higherorder and creative and creative and creative and creative
thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV 1
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating with a rating of 4
of 7 of 6 of 5
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed June 7.5% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No #N/A #### #DIV/0!
Education and Planning and implemented 2018 to implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
Services developmentally March developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
sequenced teaching 2019 sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
and learning processes to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
meet curriculum learning process learning process learning process learning process
requirements and varied as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV 1
teaching contexts. 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating with a rating of 4
of 7 of 6 of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Actual Results Score
Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
KRA QET Satisfactory Q E T Ave
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 8. Participated in June 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No #N/A #### #DIV/0!
Education collegial discussions 2018 to participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptable
Services that use teacher and March LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ evidence
learner feedback to 2019 meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to shown
enrich teaching discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/
practice. learner feedback to learner feedback to learner feedback to learner feedback to
enrich instruction enrich enrich enrich
as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Very Actual Results Score
Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
KRA QET Satisfactory Q E T Ave
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June 7.5% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No #N/A #### #DIV/0!
Education and Reporting selected, organized 2018 to selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
Services and used diagnostic, March organized and organized and organized and organized and evidence
formative and 2019 used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, shown
summative formative and formative and formative and formative and
assessment summative summative summative summative
strategies consistent assessment assessment assessment assessment
with curriculum strategies strategies strategies strategies
requirements. consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV 1
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating with a rating of 4
of 7 of 6 of 5
0 0
Rater Ratee Approving Authority