Hazel Nelson
Hazel Nelson
Hazel Nelson
Could you feel good in the same way by not believing that this was completely true?
Quicker shifts, practice, believing something true doesn’t mean that it is true, realisation tWhat
don’t you like about feeling that other people are whispering about you>
Could you feel good in the same way by not believing that this was completely true?
Quicker shifts, practice, believing something true doesn’t mean that it is true, realisation that he is
capable of holding inaccurate beliefs.
Why is the delusional belief causing distress or having an adverse effect on the patient’s life and
how does it do this?
Are there any advantages for the patient in holding this belief? If not, consider the goal of total
modification. It is good practice to speculate about the advantages or disadvantages of a patient’s
delusional beliefs but do not set goals on the basis of your speculation alone. Check them out first
by asking neutral, non-challenging questions, such as ‘What would it be life if…?” or ‘Do you wish
that … wasn’t so? Or ‘Supposing…:. Then set the goals on the basis of his responses.
If there are some advantages to the patient in holding his belief, could they be replaced from
elsewhere? If so, a total modification could still be considered if you are successful in replacing the
source of positive gain by something else. If you are unable to do this, is it possible to achieve a
partial modification that leaves the beneficial parts of the delusion intact?
If there are some advantages and some disadvantages in holding the belief, is it possible to do a
partial modification> What bits of the delusional belief should stay intact? Wat re the goals of the
parts being changed, i.e. what will the patient end up believing? Are these new beliefs compatible
with the parts of the delusional system left intact or would the partial modification have
unwanted knock on effects on the parts of the system to be retained?
If the partial modification is not possible, does the overall gain from a total modification outweigh
the losses or is it better for the patient that his whole system be left intact?
Impact of these beliefs: anxiety when outside, avoidance, isolation, voice-hearing, cannot relax
New beliefs: other people are focussed on things other than me, I can be incorrect in my
thoughts/beliefs at different times, people get attention for good/bad things, my self-attention
when outside makes me feel that others must also be paying attention to me.
1. Thoughts and ideas all the time most of which are unconscious to us
2. This makes sense because then we can process events quickly
3. Part of the brain selects the most useful ideas into awareness so we can think about them
more carefully
4. Production of thoughts occurs so quickly sometimes there can be errors
5. These ‘erroneous’ thoughts usually drop out but sometimes our brain will latch on and
give it more value than its worth
6. Our automatic thoughts reflect our worries and concerns
7. We cannot control our automatic thoughts and hence cannot be held responsible for them
Thinking of delusions like intuitions – intuitions are based on very little objective evidence and yet
are carried with conviction and certainty. Brain is very used to producing intuitions. Also
equivalent to your brain ‘jumping to conclusions’.
Underlying fear e.g., others are dangerous has created an automatic bias in perception of all
stimuli and situations. E.g., someone boarding a plane who believes that it is going to crash –
influence emotions, behaviour and experience.
Certainty once it has been attached is difficult to dislodge. ‘Better safe than sorry’ response. If I
have learned that X means danger, we are programmed to not have this shifted easily.
Experience is not the same as fact – problem with psychotic experiences is that they are self-
evidently true. Perceiving something to be self-evidently true does not mean that it is true.
Examples:
1. I hear my neighbours having a furious row but later discover that it was the television
2. I hear my friends criticising my new hairstyle but later discover they were discussing
something else
3. I bend down to pick up a piece of mud on the carpet and discover that it is an ink stain
4. I walk along and the moon in the sky seems to follow me wherever I go
5. I pull my hand away sharply as an insect lands on it, but it was only a leaf
6. I interpret the pain in my chest as a massive heart attack but later realise it must have
been indigestion
7. I enjoy a slice of bread and butter and later discover it was margarine!
8. My friend forgets to send me a birthday card, but I later discover that it was actually
sitting at the post office due to a strike
9. I think that my daughter has done very well to get a grade 1 in her maths exam until she
tells me that the usual way of marking is flipped and 9 is the top grade
Past beliefs no longer held – beliefs strongly endorsed in the past no longer endorsed at
maintained intensity now.
Two-route model. CBT attempts to balance the rational route of thinking to counter the more
automatic intuitional route. The latter may be helpful but less accurate and there’s the higher
route that takes more time but is more accurate. For some people, as we talked about the
intuition route is more active and stronger, is that right? The feeling of certainty that can be
produced by the quicker processing can be misleading. It will be challenging to overcome this
feeling of certainty but we will work out a way to strengthen the rational route.
Where the delusion is based on a very strong feeling of certainty that is not backed up by objective
evidence. The approach to modification is to promote awareness that a feeling no matter how
persuasive does not necessarily guarantee that it is true.
The shift in the delusion starts with the availability of an alternative explanation that is more
plausible. Generation of the alternative explanation generated first then shown to be consistent
with the evidence overall.