CH 24
CH 24
CH 24
Mass Transfer
Chapter 24
Fundamentals
dV
For species A,
mass concentration, 𝜌𝐴 , is defined as the mass of A per unit volume
of the mixture
The total mass concentration or density,𝜌, is the total mass of the mixture
contained in the unit volume
The mass fraction, , is the mass concentration of species A divided by the
total mass density
The mole fraction for liquid or solid mixtures, xA, and for gaseous mixtures, yA, are
the molar concentrations of species A divided by the total molar density
For a gaseous mixture that obeys the ideal gas law, the mole fraction, yA, can be
written in terms of pressures
Fick’s Law
Molecular Mass Transfer
or Molecular Diffusion/Diffusion
Since there are greater number of blue molecules in the right hand side,
then more blue molecules will diffuse from right to left hand side. The net
diffusion of blue molecules from high to low concentration region
• Fluxes: The mass (or molar) flux of a given species is a vector
quantity denoting the amount of the particular species, in
either mass or molar units, that passes per given increment of
time through a unit area normal to the vector. The flux may be
defined with reference to coordinates that are fixed in space,
coordinates that are moving with the mass average velocity, or
coordinates that are moving with the molar-average velocity.
• Molar flux of A: (moles/time/area): JA
- general form:
- special form:
• Mass flux of A: (mass/time/area): jA
- general form:
- special form:
• Total molar Flux: NA
Steffan (1872) and Maxwell (1877), using the kinetic theory of gases, proved that
the mass flux relative to a fixed coordinate was a result of two contributions: the
concentration gradient contribution and the bulk motion contribution.
For a binary system with a constant average velocity in the z direction, the molar
flux in the z direction relative to the molar-average velocity may also be
expressed by
As the component velocities, and , are velocities relative to the fixed z axis,
the Quantities and are fluxes of components A and B relative to a fixed
z coordinate;
we symbolize for components A and B relative this new type of flux that is
relative to a set of stationary axes by
It is important to note that the molar flux, NA, is a resultant of the two vector
quantities:
Either or both quantities can be a significant part of the total molar flux, NA.
Whenever ther above equation is applied to describe molar diffusion, the vector
nature of the individual fluxes, NA and NB, must be considered and then, in turn,
the direction of each of two vector quantities must be evaluated.
The mass flux, nA, relative to a fixed spatial coordinate system, is defined for a
binary system in terms of mass density and mass fraction by
Where and
Under isothermal, isobaric conditions, this relation simplifies to
To derive the case for A through stagnant nondiffusing B, NB,Z = 0
Fick’s law of proportionality, DAB, is known as the diffusion coefficient
Variables:
T (K)
P (atm)
σAB (Ǻ): collision diamter (L-J parameter): from table K.2
ΩD: collision integral = f (k T /εAB)
Appendix Table K.1 lists VD as a function of k T /εAB, k is the
Boltzmann constant, which is 1:38 1016 ergs/K, and εAB is the
energy of molecular interaction for the binary system A and B.
DAB (cm2/s)
Effect of P and T:
Other empirical equations have been proposed9 for estimating the diffusion
coefficient for nonpolar, binary gas systems at low pressures. The empirical
correlation recommended by Fuller, Schettler, and Giddings permits the evaluation
of the diffusivity when reliable Lennard–Jones parameters
Fuller correlation
Example 3
Brokaw11 has suggested a method for estimating diffusion coefficient for
binary gas mixtures containing polar compounds. The Hirschfelder equation ()
is still used; however, the collision integral is evaluated by
Where,
and
with each component’s characteristic length evaluated by
Mass transfer in gas mixtures of several components can be described by
theoretical equations involving the diffusion coefficients for the various binary pairs
involved in the mixture.
Hirschfelder, Curtiss, and Bird present an expression in its most general form.
Wilke has simplified the theory and has shown that a close approximation to the
correct form is given by the relation
Example 4
Solution
Liquid mass diffusivity:
Eq. (24-52): “Wilke & Chang eq”
Assumptions:
- nonelectrolytes
- very dilute solutions
Variables:
- T (K)
- μB (cp)
- ΦB : association parameter for solvent B
- VA (cm3/mol) : molecular volume of solute
- DAB (cm2/s)
An equation that has been developed from the hydrodynamical theory is the
Stokes–Einstein equation
Where,
DAB is the diffusivity of A in dilute solution in B
k is the Boltzmann constant,
T is the absolute temperature,
r is the solute particle radius
𝜇𝐵 is the solvent viscosity.
Wilke and Chang have proposed the following correlation for nonelectrolytes
in an infinitely dilute solution
Where,
DAB is the mass diffusivity of A diffusing through liquid solvent B, in cm2/s;
𝜇𝐵 is the viscosity of the solution, in centipoises;
T is absolute temperature, in K;
MB is the molecular weight of the solvent;
VA is the molal volume of solute at normal boiling point, in cm3/g mol;
𝜑𝐵 is the ‘‘association’’ parameter for solvent B.
Example 5
Solutions
Scheibel21 has proposed that the Wilke–Chang relation be modified to
eliminate the association factor, 𝜑𝐵 , yielding
Pore Diffusivity
NA = kc ∆cA
What we Learn?