Design of Turbo Jet Engine: A Project Report On

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 104

A Project report

on

DESIGN OF TURBO JET ENGINE


Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of degree of
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
in
Mechanical Engineering
Submitted By

G. SAI KUMAR 18D45A0349

T. PRANAY 18D45A0350

D. NARESH 18D45A0355

Under the Guidance of

Dr. P. Mallesham
Professor & HOD
B.E., M.E., Ph.D., ISTE(LM)., AMIE (India), IWS, IFS, CSI

Department of Mechanical Engineering


SRI INDU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
(Affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University)

2021
DESIGN OF TURBOJET ENGINE

Accredited by NBA

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the project work entitled “DESIGN OF TURBO JET
ENGINE” is the bonafide work done by,

G. SAI KUMAR 18D45A0349


T. PRANAY 18D45A0350
D. NARESH 18D45A0355

The students of Department of Mechanical Engineering in SRI INDU COLLEGE OF


ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY submitted this project to JNTU, Hyderabad
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of B.Tech degree in Mechanical
Engineering. This wo rk has been carried out under my guidance and has not been
submitted the same for any university/institution for the award of any degree/diploma.

Internal Examiner HOD

Principal External examiner


DESIGN OF TURBOJET ENGINE
DESIGN OF TURBOJET ENGINE ii

Abstract
The goal of this major qualifying project was to design and manufacture a

small gas turbine engine. The manufactured components included: axial turbine,

stator, diffuser, compressor inlet, shaft, outer casing, combustion chamber, fuel

distributer, exhaust nozzle, and inlet flange. We reviewed literature regarding

gas turbine engine components, designed each component, and manufactured

them accordingly. We then assembled our engine and planned for testing.
Acknowledgements

At this pleasing moment of having successfully completed our project, we wish to convey our sincere

thanks and gratitude to the management of our college and our beloved CHAIRMAN, SHRI VENKATA

RAO sir, who provided all the facilities to us. We would like to express our sincere thanks to our PRINCIPAL,

SHRI Dr. P. MALLESHAM sir, for forwarding us to do our project and offering adequate duration in

completing our project.

We are also grateful to the PRINCIPAL sir for giving suggestions

SHRI P. MALLESHAM sir, for his constructive ideas and for good
suggestions & encouragement during our project. We also extent our deepest gratitude towards him as for

acting as our GUIDE and giving us proper guidance without which we won’t be able to finish this project

We also express our indebt thanks to our TEACHING and NON- T E A C H I N G staffs of

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, of SRI INDU COLEGE OF

ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY for their constant support and guidance,


Without which we could not possibly complete our project.
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT II

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS III

TABLE OF CONTENTS IV

TABLE OF FIGURES VI

TABLE OF EQUATIONS VII

TABLE OF TABLES VIII

1.0 INTRODUCTION 9

2.0 BACKGROUND 12

2.1 Gas Turbines 12

2.2 Components 14

2.2.A. Compressor 14

2.2.B. Diffuser 18

2.2.C. Turbine & Stator 18

2.2.D. Combustion Chamber 23

2.2.E. Exhaust Nozzle 25

2.2.F. Fuel System, Lubrication & Bearings 27

2.3 Ideal Cycle Analysis 30

2.3.A. The Brayton Cycle 30

2.3.B. Ideal Component Analysis 33

3.0 METHODOLOGY 37

3.1 Compressor 37

3.2 Inlet Shroud 39


3.3 Diffuser 41

3.4 Combustion Chamber 43

3.5 Shaft Housing 44

3.6 Fuel Distributer 46

3.7 Turbine 47

3.8 Outer Casing & Inlet Flange 50

3.9 Shaft 53

3.10 Stator & Stator Housing 55

3.11 Exhaust Nozzle 56

3.12 Bearings, Fuel Injection, and Lubrication 58

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 60

REFERENCES 63

APPENDIX A: IDEAL CYCLE ANALYSIS 65

APPENDIX B: TURBINE BLADE STRESS 70

APPENDIX C: FUEL CONSUMPTION CALCULATION 71


Table of Figures
FIGURE 1: FOUR TYPES OF GAS TURBINE ENGINES (AVIATION, 2015) 14
FIGURE 2: EXAMPLE OF CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR 15
FIGURE 3: COMPRESSOR MAP EXAMPLE (GARRET, 2017) 17
FIGURE 4: TURBINE WHEEL (LEFT) AND STATOR (RIGHT) EXAMPLES 20
FIGURE 5: VELOCITY VECTORS FOR STATOR AND TURBINE (MATTINGLY, 2000) 21
FIGURE 6: EXAMPLE OF AN ANNULAR COMBUSTION CHAMBER 24
FIGURE 7: EXAMPLE GEOMETRY OF OPEN BRAYTON CYCLE (FLACK, 2005) 31
FIGURE 8: T-V, P-V AND T-S DIAGRAMS (MIT, 2014) 32
FIGURE 9: GT4202 COMPRESSOR MAP (LIMIT ENGINEERING, 2015) 38
FIGURE 10: G4202 ATTACHED TO DRIVE SHAFT 39
FIGURE 11: INLET SHROUD 41
FIGURE 12: CHANNEL DIFFUSER 42
FIGURE 13: COMBUSTION CHAMBER 44
FIGURE 14: SHAFT HOUSING 45
FIGURE 15: FUEL DISTRIBUTOR 47
FIGURE 16: AXIAL TURBINE 50
FIGURE 17: OUTER CASING 51
FIGURE 18: INLET FLANGE 52
FIGURE 19: SHAFT ASSEMBLY 54
FIGURE 20: NOZZLE 57
FIGURE 21: LUBRICATION SYSTEM 59
FIGURE 22: NOZZLE (LEFT) AND COMPRESSOR (RIGHT) VIEWS OF ASSEMBLY 62
Table of Equations
EQUATION 1: PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS COMPRESSOR 15
EQUATION 2: CHANGE IN ENTHALPY ACROSS COMPRESSOR (KAMPS, 2005) 16
EQUATION 3: POWER INPUT FOR COMPRESSOR (KAMPS, 2005) 16
EQUATION 4: THRUST VECTOR (SHRECKLING, 1992) 21
EQUATION 5: CENTRIFUGAL FORCE CALCULATION (NPOWER, 2009) 22
EQUATION 6: BLADE ROOT NOMINAL STRESS 22
EQUATION 7: THERMAL OUTPUT EQUATION (SHRECKLING, 1992) 28
EQUATION 8: FUEL FLOW REQUIRED (SHRECKLING, 1992) 29
EQUATION 9: PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS INLET 33
EQUATION 10: TEMPERATURE RATIO ACROSS INLET 33
EQUATION 11: PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS COMPRESSOR 34
EQUATION 12: TEMPERATURE RATIO ACROSS COMPRESSOR 34
EQUATION 13: COMPRESSOR T-P RELATION (NASA, COMPRESSOR THERMODYNAMICS,
2015B) 34 EQUATION 14: COMPRESSOR WORK (NASA, COMPRESSOR
THERMODYNAMICS, 2015B) 35
EQUATION 15: PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS COMBUSTOR 35
EQUATION 16: PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS COMBUSTOR 35
EQUATION 17: PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS TURBINE 36
EQUATION 18: TEMPERATURE RATIO ACROSS TURBINE 36
EQUATION 19: TURBINE T-P RELATION (NASA, TURBINE THERMODYNAMICS, 2015D)36
EQUATION 20: TURBINE WORK (NASA, TURBINE THERMODYNAMICS, 2015D) 36
EQUATION 21: PRESSURE RATIO ACROSS NOZZLE 36
EQUATION 22: TEMPERATURE RATIO ACROSS NOZZLE 36
Table of Tables
TABLE 1: SPECIFIC ENERGY AND DENSITY OF DIFFERENT FUELS...........27
TABLE 2: STAGES OF GAS TURBINE ENGINE.................................................31
DESIGN OF MINIATURE TURBOJET 9
ENGINE

1.1 Introduction
The gas turbine engine is a machine that, according to the thermodynamic

Brayton Cycle, does work by harnessing energy from a working fluid and

converting the energy into a useable form. Various types of gas turbines are

designed to perform a range of tasks but all operate on similar principles. Air

enters the engine, is compressed, mixed with fuel, combusted, and then expanded

through a rotating turbine. Common applications of modern gas turbines include:

producing auxiliary power for ground or aircraft systems, propelling military

aircraft at supersonic speeds, and driving the rotor system of helicopters

(Macisaac & Langton, 2011). Due to the extreme temperatures and high

rotational speeds experienced by engine components, design and construction of a

gas turbine demands accuracy, informed material selection, knowledge of

thermodynamics, and the ability to model and machine metal components.

As material processing techniques advanced, it became possible to

manufacture gas turbine engines small enough to power radio controlled (RC)

airplanes. Modern gas turbines for full size aircraft generally utilize axial

compressors and turbines with multiple stages of blades. These multi-stage

components increase efficiency, pressure ratios, and performance characteristics

(Shreckling, 1992). However, RC jet modelers found that small engines can be

reasonably efficient and powerful with single stage compressor and turbine stages.

A centrifugal compressor matched to an axial turbine has become a common

design among RC jet enthusiasts. With this simplification, along with


DESIGN OF MINIATURE TURBOJET 10
ENGINE
advancements in CNC machining and 3D modeling, it is possible to manufacture

a complete miniature gas turbine with a relatively small investment.


Although miniature gas turbines are now available for sale from a number

of manufacturers, the secrets of design and construction are still somewhat

hidden from the end customer. Accurate analysis of performance is elusive even

with the utilization of modern software, and an iterative design process offers the

soundest path toward new engine development (Stricker, 1998). However, a

number of publications are available that instruct the ambitious RC jet enthusiast

on how to manufacture an engine with amateur means.

The goal of this project is to call on the literature available regarding small

gas turbines in order to design and manufacture an engine that is self-sustaining.

In order to expedite the design process, efficiency and thrust production are not

prioritized. Due to budget and time restrictions we are unable to complete

multiple iterations of a new engine. Therefore, we rely on engine designs

currently developed to aid in the design of our major components. Subjects such

as new airfoil design for turbine blades, nozzle efficiency, and combustor

efficiency can be the subject of years of research and investment. For this reason,

we drew on industry standards and recommendations of modelers to design some

of our components. We realized early that two crucial components, the centrifugal

compressor and ball bearings, would be impossible to design and manufacture

given the time frame. We made the decision to purchase these components in

order to make our project more feasible given the restrictions.

This project culminated in the manufacture of twelve major components.

• Compressor inlet shroud


• Diffuser
• Power transmitting shaft
• Shaft housing
• Annular Combustion chamber
• Fuel distributer
• Stator
• Stator/turbine housing
• Axial Turbine
• Exhaust nozzle
• Outer casing
• Inlet flange

Additionally, we assembled our components and added a fuel injection system

and bearing lubrication system. Due to time constraint, we were unable to

implement a throttle mechanism or construct a simple and safe engine stand and

were not able to test the engine. Each component listed above was first modeled

with SOLIDWORKS software and then manufactured with the material

processing capabilities available in Worcester Polytechnic Institute’s Washburn

and Higgins Labs. Throughout the experience, our team furthered our design and

manufacturing skills through manual and CNC milling and turning, TIG

welding, sheet metal forming, and regular engineering troubleshooting.


2.1 Background

This chapter reviews previous research on gas turbines with an emphasis

on small/miniature sized turbojets. We provide an introduction to gas turbines and

their use as well as methods for conducting theoretical cycle analysis.

Additionally, we introduce the components that constitute a modern small gas

turbine.

2.2 Gas Turbines


A gas turbine is a type of continuous, internal combustion engine that

contains three major components: a compressor, a combustor, and a turbine. A

basic configuration, referred to as the turbojet, consists of an inlet nozzle where air

at free stream velocity is directed into a compressor (Hunecke, 1997). The air is

accelerated and compressed across the compressor stage and then redirected into

the combustion chamber. Fuel is injected into the chamber, combined with the

high-pressure air, and ignited to create combustion. The hot gas, which has

expanded in the combustion chamber, is forced through the turbine blades resulting

in rotation of the shaft which ties the turbine

to compressor. From here the exhaust gas is accelerated through an outlet

nozzle. The high velocity exhaust is at a speed much greater than the free stream

velocity and therefore produces thrust.

The basis for the creation of thrust is Isaac Newton’s second law of motion,

force is equivalent to mass times acceleration (Shreckling, 1992). According to

the principles of conservation of momentum, the thrust force created by the


turbojet is equal to the mass flow rate of the exhaust gas multiplied by the velocity

relative to the free stream velocity of air entering the compressor. The more fuel

that is consumed by the engine, the more


thrust is created, assuming constant efficiency. One method for increasing the

amount of thrust is by afterburning, also known as thrust augmentation. This

design incorporates a separate burner that combusts extra fuel and releases hot

exhaust gases downstream from the turbine (Britannica, 2018). Afterburners can

substantially increase thrust at the expense of rapid fuel consumption. However,

afterburners are primarily used in military aircraft to achieve supersonic flight.

Some gas turbines do not generate thrust and instead have become a

popular method for power generation due to increases in efficiencies (Boyce,

Meherwan P., et al., 2012). Although these industrial applications for gas turbines

exist, this paper focuses on aircraft propulsion applications. Four main types of

turbines utilized in the aerospace industry are the turbojet, turbofan, turboprop and

turboshaft.

Turbojet and turbofan engines provide thrust generated from reaction

forces created by high velocity exhaust gas leaving the outlet nozzle. The turbofan

is the most common type of engine used in the aerospace industry (Hunecke,

1997). It utilizes a fan that is upstream the compressor, which is also driven by the

turbine. Air bypasses the compressor and rejoins the flow downstream of the

turbine adding “cold thrust.” This design achieves better fuel efficiency than

turbojet engines while operating at cruising speeds common to civil airline travel.

The turbojet engine, unlike the turbofan, does not allow air to bypass the

compressor, it is simple by design and the earliest type of turbine propulsion

engine.

Turboprop and turboshaft engines use exhaust gases to drive a separate

turbine that drives a propeller. The difference between the two is that the
turboshaft utilizes all exhaust gas to drive the propeller, whereas the turboprop

also uses some of this exhaust


gas to produce thrust. Turboshaft engines are commonly used in helicopters, such

as the Sikorsky CH-53G. Figure 1 below gives a visual representation of these

four engines.

Figure 1: Four Types of Gas Turbine Engines (Aviation, 2015)

2.3 Components

In order to better understand how a small turbojet engine operates, one must

understand the purpose for each component. This section reviews the conceptual

physics and thermodynamics as they relate to each individual component.

2.3.A. Compressor
As we now know, the compressor is the stage of the engine which creates

high enough pressure to achieve combustion. The two types of compressors

commonly used in
turbojet engines are axial and centrifugal (Stricker, 1998). The axial compressor

directs the air flow parallel to the rotational axis whereas the centrifugal design

directs the flow radially outward, perpendicular to the rotational axis. Small gas

turbines, that produce less than 5 MW, are often designed around centrifugal

compressors. Although these are less efficient than multi-stage axial compressors,

centrifugal compressors are reliable and able to produce pressure ratios in excess

of 8:1 with a single stage (Kamps, 2005). The pressure ratio is equal to the total

pressure downstream the compressor divided by the

pressure at the compressor


entry. 𝑃$
Π=
𝑃1

Equation 1: Pressure Ratio Across Compressor

This ratio impacts thrust, fuel consumption and engine efficiency. An example

of a centrifugal compressor can be seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Example of Centrifugal Compressor


Regardless of the exact geometry in the centrifugal compressor, the

purpose is to redirect the air radially along the axis of rotation (NASA,

Compressor, 2015a). Air flows along the blades of the compressor and is sent out

in the radial direction by centrifugal force. The high-speed air accelerated by the

compressor then enters the diffuser stage of the engine. The increase in pressure

across the compressor is accompanied by increases in temperature and enthalpy

(Kamps, 2005). Change in enthalpy across an adiabatic

compressor can be defined


by:
∆ℎ = 𝑇𝐶𝑝(𝜋-.$/0 − 1)

Equation 2: Change in Enthalpy Across Compressor (Kamps, 2005)

where,

𝐽
∆ℎ = 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 9𝑛 𝐸𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑝𝑦𝑘𝑔

𝑇 = 𝐼𝑛𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜F 𝑎9𝑟 (𝐾𝑒𝑙𝑣9𝑛)


𝐾𝐽
𝐶𝑝 = 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐9F9𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑜F 𝑎9𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟9𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟 ( )
𝐾𝑔𝐾

𝜋 = 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡9𝑜 𝑜F 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟

This rise in enthalpy is proportional to the input power provided by the

turbine to the compressor, which can be seen in the following expression.

𝑚∆ℎ
𝑃= L

Equation 3: Power Input for Compressor (Kamps, 2005)


where,
𝐽
∆ℎ = 𝐸𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑝𝑦 9𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒 ( )
𝑘𝑔

𝑃 = 𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 9𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡

(N) L = 𝐸FF9𝑐9𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦
𝑘𝑔
𝑚 = 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 F𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑜F 𝑎9𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟 ( )
𝑠

From empirical data and computer simulation, performance of a

compressor can be represented by compressor maps. These charts plot

performance characteristics of a compressor in order to understand the

compressors’ capabilities. Typically, mass flow rate and pressure ratio are

plotted, although sometimes rotations per minute (RPM) or efficiency are seen.

An example of a standard compressor map can be seen below in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Compressor Map Example (Garret, 2017)


2.3.B. Diffuser
The purpose of a diffuser is to decelerate the speed of the incoming

compressed fluid, converting the speed of the gas into pressure. Essentially, the

diffuser converts high speed air in the form of kinetic energy into potential energy

in the form of high pressure. There are a variety of acceptable diffuser designs for

small gas turbines. One design, the radial wedged diffuser, has become popular

among manufacturers of small gas turbines for model aircraft. The KJ66, a

primitive engine design widely popular among RC jet enthusiasts, utilizes the

radial wedged diffuser design (Ling, Wong, & Armfield, 2007). The blade

configuration of these diffusers can vary greatly and still perform adequately,

some are curved in the direction of rotation of the impeller while others curve in

the opposite direction. However, perhaps the most desirable blade design

characteristic for small gas turbines is that the blade widens to provide sufficient

surface area for bolt holes (Kamps, 2005). These bolt holes provide a convenient

location that allows the manufacturer to bolt the diffuser, compressor and inlet

shroud into a ridged body.

2.3.C. Turbine & Stator

Turbines, like compressors, are designed as either axial or radial. Axial-

flow turbines are the most widely used because they offer the possibility for higher

mass flow rates than that of radial turbines. Typically, axial-flow turbines consist

of multiple stages in order to increase efficiency and thrust production. However,

when designing small gas turbines single stage axial turbines are often used. The

turbine stage usually consists of nozzle stationary guide vanes, also known as a
stator. Stator blades are airfoils with their
leading edges facing the combustion chamber (Hunecke, 1997). Their purpose is

to reduce the phenomena known as swirl and allow air to accelerate into the

turbine blades. The stator directs exhaust gases in the axial direction towards the

turbine blades while increasing the absolute velocity and kinetic energy of the

exhaust gases. The stator has a similar yet opposite role to that of the diffuser in

the compressor stage. In the diffuser, the area between the adjacent blades

increase in the downstream direction whereas in the stator this area increases.

The stator and turbine must contend with extremely high thermal loads. By

raising the turbine inlet temperature, more thrust per unit mass flow rate is

generated (Mattingly, 2000). The turbine also operates at extremely high angular

velocities. These criteria have driven the development of new materials and

cooling techniques used in this stage of the engine. Even small turbine blades can

encounter exhaust gases with temperatures in excess of 1000 degrees centigrade

while rotating upwards of 100,000 RPM. Due to high pressures, temperatures, and

peripheral blade speeds nickel-based super alloys are often used (Mukinutalapati,

2011). These materials must also have high resistance of creep due to their

continuous use under these conditions. Various companies have developed

Nickel-Chromium super alloys for use in turbine blades.

Common trade names for these alloys include: Inconel 625, Altemp 625, and

Chronin 625. Examples of a turbine and a stator with housing can be seen in 5.
Figure 4: Turbine Wheel (left) and Stator (right) Examples

Turbine blade design is perhaps the most critical consideration for

improving thrust creation. The goal in turbine blade design is to produce a

velocity vector at the turbine exit that is the same magnitude and direction

everywhere along the blade (Mattingly, 2000). The purpose of this design is to

provide axially directed flow at turbine exit with as little swirl as possible,

considering swirl is unusable for thrust creation. In order to better understand

stator and turbine blade design it is necessary to examine vector analysis with

velocity triangles.

Three standardized variables are commonly used in velocity diagrams to

represent the interaction between the turbine blades and working fluid. These

three variables are: the peripheral velocity vector of the blade element (r), the

absolute velocity vector (V), and the relative velocity vector (VR). Figure 5

shows how these vectors are influenced when progressing through the turbine
stage.
Figure 5: Velocity Vectors for Stator and Turbine (Mattingly, 2000)

The use of velocity triangles and diagrams is crucial to turbine and stator

design. Thrust for example, is influenced by the velocity vector that points in the

axial direction of the turbine. Sometimes called the thrust vector, this velocity

can be determined using

the following
equation.
𝑉Q = 𝜔𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛽Q)

Equation 4: Thrust Vector (Shreckling, 1992)

where,

𝑉Q = 𝐴𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 𝑜F 𝑒𝑥ℎ𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑔𝑎𝑠

𝜔𝑟 = 𝑃𝑒𝑟9𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 𝑜F 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏9𝑛𝑒 𝑏𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑒

𝛽Q = 𝐴𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑉Q𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜔𝑟(𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡9𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 𝑜F 𝑒𝑥ℎ𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑔𝑎𝑠)


Turbine rotors encounter extremely high temperatures and rotational

speeds which result in high centrifugal forces and therefore high stress in the

blades. The centrifugal force on a turbine blade can be calculated using

Equation 5:

𝑟1$ − 𝑟$$
$
𝐹 = 𝜌𝐴𝜔 ( )
2
Equation 5: Centrifugal Force Calculation (npower, 2009)

where,

𝑘𝑔
𝜌 = 𝐷𝑒𝑛𝑠9𝑡𝑦 𝑜F 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏9𝑛𝑒 𝑏𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟9𝑎𝑙
𝑚Q

𝐴 = 𝐶𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡9𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜F 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑚$


𝑟𝑎𝑑9𝑎𝑛𝑠
𝜔 = 𝐴𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐9𝑡𝑦 ( )
second

𝑟1 = 𝑅𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑑9𝑠𝑘 𝑟𝑎𝑑9𝑢𝑠 𝑚

𝑟$ = 𝐵𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑡9𝑝 𝑟𝑎𝑑9𝑢𝑠 (𝑚)

From here, it is possible to calculate the nominal stress on the blade root with

Equation
6:
𝐹
𝜎=
𝐴𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑡

Equation 6: Blade Root Nominal Stress

Where Aroot is the cross-sectional area of the blade root, which in in this

project is equivalent to the cross-sectional area of the blade, A, due to a constant

cross-sectional blade design. This nominal stress should be accounted for when

selecting blade material to ensure that the blades can withstand the centrifugal

force. Turbine rotors often require high safety factors, making sure that this
nominal stress is magnitudes lower than the
allowable tensile strength of the material used. It should be noted that the center of

the turbine wheel experiences centrifugal forces up to three times as high as the

blades due to a stress concentration at the hole (Kamps, 2005). Common turbine

wheel designs account for this by employing a thicker center of the disk than

along the outsides.

2.3.D. Combustion Chamber

The purpose of the combustion chamber is to retrieve air from the

compressor stage and deliver it at much greater temperatures to the turbine stage,

this is where heat is added to the cycle by burning fuel. The diffuser section of the

compressor stage decelerates the airflow in order to increase pressure before it

reaches the combustion chamber. This high-pressure air stores potential (pressure)

energy and will produce better combustion and cycle efficiency. Energy is further

increased through combustion of injected fuel, usually kerosene, and the high-

pressure air (Hunecke, 1997). Average air/fuel ratios range from around 45:1 to

130:1 for the entire combustion chamber however fuel will only burn efficiently

around the stoichiometric air/fuel ratio, 15:1. As this project is concerned with

combustion chamber design, it should be noted that many advancements in

combustion chamber design have been founded upon empirical data and

experimentation (NASA, 1973). Therefore, design of combustion chambers relies

heavily on the analysis of previous, similarly designed systems.

Two common types of combustion chambers have been developed, the

cylindrical, or can chamber, and the annular chamber. A single annular chamber

can be employed quite effectively in a turbojet engine while being conducive to


minimizing weight, cost,
and complexity of design (Smith, 1956). Our research focuses on small,

annular combustion chambers that can be utilized in miniature turbojet

engines.

Similar to the turbine stage, the combustion chamber must account for

extremely high temperatures. For this reason, nickel-based super alloys are often

used for this component. Conditions that constitute an effective combustion stage

design include: continuous combustion, uniform combustion (no hot spots),

adequate mixing of air and fuel, low pressure losses, and short length to cross-

sectional area ratio. Figure 6 shows an

example of an annular combustion chamber.

Figure 6: Example of an Annular Combustion Chamber

The combustion chamber is broken down into three zones: the primary,

secondary, and tertiary zones (Smith, 1956). These three different zones can be

associated with the three distinct hole sizes on both the outer and inner liner of

the combustion chamber. The largest holes make up the primary zone, the

second largest make up the secondary zone, and the smallest holes make up the
tertiary zone. Often,
these holes are plunged in order to act as small nozzles and accelerate the

incoming air. The gas mixture ignites, traditionally through the use of a spark

plug, in the primary zone which is the first combustion zone downstream the

compressor. The secondary zone is where further air is injected and the

combustion process is completed. The last section, the tertiary zone, is where any

leftover air is injected to achieve air temperatures sufficient for entry into the

turbine stage.

In order for a combustion chamber to be effective, continuous

combustion must be achieved so that the heat from a previous reaction is sufficient

to vaporize the liquid fuel for the next reaction. High initial temperatures, high

fuel to air ratios and high pressures are necessary for this continuous combustion

(El-Sayed, 2015). If the fuel to air ratio is too low, then heat generated from the

reaction is mostly spent in increasing the temperature of nitrogen and oxygen in

the chamber rather than vaporizing the incoming fuel. In order to achieve this self-

sustaining combustion, engines are often started with an alternative gaseous fuel

source, such as propane. This allows for the engine to achieve sufficient

temperatures before introducing kerosene and risking partial combustion that

could result in carbon build up that can gunk up the engine or cause hot spots.

2.3.E. Exhaust Nozzle

The purpose of an exhaust nozzle is to create thrust by converting the

potential energy of incoming gas into kinetic energy (Hunecke, 1997). In the

nozzle, the mass flow rate is constant. As velocity increases in the direction of

flow, pressure decreases. Typically, length is not a crucial design consideration


however, losses due to friction can be excessive if the nozzle is too long. In an

ideal nozzle,
there are minimal kinetic energy losses due to this friction. Well-designed

nozzles can commonly achieve efficiencies up to 90%.

Common nozzle designs for aircraft include the converging nozzle and the

converging-diverging nozzle. Converging nozzles are used for aircraft flying at

subsonic speeds, speeds which are less than the speed of sound throughout the

nozzle. Converging-diverging nozzles are used to achieve supersonic flows, which

are typically used in military aircraft. Flow through convergent nozzles are

subsonic when the pressure at the exit is equal to ambient pressure (Hill &

Peterson, 1992). The exit area of a convergent nozzle is known as the throat. This

project focuses on the use of a converging nozzle in order to reduce noise and

avoid shockwaves.

Theoretical converging nozzle analysis uses some basic assumptions:

frictional losses between the air and the walls are neglected, the gases are treated

as ideal gases, the process is steady state and steady flow, the process is isentropic,

and mass and energy are conserved through the nozzle (Smith, 1956). These

assumptions aid in the design of nozzles, however small jet engines have been

successful using a very simple converging nozzle design with minimal reduction

in cross sectional area across the nozzle. This is done in order to avoid choked

flow at the exit (Benini & Giacometti, 2007).


2.3.F. Fuel System, Lubrication & Bearings

Gas turbines can utilize an assortment of liquid or gaseous fuels. Gaseous

fuels do not require vaporization to achieve combustion. However, liquid fuels

present a lower risk of gas escape and are therefore easier to handle and store. For

this reason, liquid fuels are common in aircraft engines. The desirable

characteristic when choosing a fuel source is a high specific heat of combustion.

Also known as the specific energy, this property is defined as the energy per unit

mass of a fuel (Shreckling, 1992). High specific energy results in lower quantities

of fuel needed to achieve high levels of energy production. Common turbine fuels

include: diesel, kerosene, propane and butane, which all have specific energy

values ranging from 40-50 MJ/kg. Table 1 shows some common specific energy

values for different fuel sources.

Table 1: Specific Energy and Density of Different Fuels

Fuel Specific Energy (MJ/kg) Density (kg/m3)

Methane 55.6 423

Propane 50.3 585

Butane 49.5 601

Gasoline 47.3 716

Kerosene 46.2 830

Diesel 44.8 830


The stoichiometric air/fuel ratio of the mixture is essential to achieving

combustion. This ratio defines the amount of air consumed by the engine

compared to the amount of fuel consumed. For example, gasoline engines require

an air/fuel ratio of 14.7:1, meaning for every 1 part of fuel, 14.7 parts of air are

required to achieve combustion. The proper mixture of fuel and air is critical in

achieving high engine durability and performance. Any excess fuel will not

combust and form deposits on combustion chamber components such as injectors,

vaporization tubes or even turbine blades (Flack, 2005). This can further lead to

the development of hotspots and inefficient combustion. Another important

consideration is determining the minimum required fuel consumption for the

engine. By calculating the heat output and then using the specific density and

energy of the fuel, the minimum fuel flow requirement can be determined.

h = 𝑚𝑐∆𝑇

Equation 7: Thermal Output Equation (Shreckling, 1992)


Where,

h = 𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 (N)

𝐾𝐽
𝑐 = 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐9F9𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑜F 𝑎9𝑟𝑘𝑔𝐾

𝑚 = 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 F𝑙𝑜𝑤 rate

∆𝑇 = 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 9𝑛 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑔9𝑛𝑒


h
𝐹=
𝑒𝜌

Equation 8: Fuel Flow Required (Shreckling, 1992)

where,

𝑚𝐿
𝐹 = 𝑀9𝑛9𝑚𝑢𝑚 F𝑢𝑒𝑙 F𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑠

𝐾𝐽
𝑒 = 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐9F9𝑐 𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑜F F𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑘𝑔

𝑘𝑔
𝜌 = 𝐷𝑒𝑛𝑠9𝑡𝑦 𝑜F F𝑢𝑒𝑙 ( )
𝑚𝐿

In order to burn liquid fuels effectively, the fuel must first be vaporized

and then be mixed with oxygen. One method of vaporizing liquid fuel is the

integration of vaporization tubes inside the combustion chamber. These tubes act

as heat exchangers between the cold liquid fuel and surrounding hot gases. The

temperature of the combustion chamber must be high enough so that

vaporization can occur using liquid fuels (Shreckling, 1992). To achieve these

temperatures, gaseous fuels can be used as a method to starting small gas turbine

engines in order to attain full vaporization.


2.4 Ideal Cycle Analysis

The goal of cycle analysis with regard to design of gas turbines is to

develop values for performance parameters. Thrust, fuel consumption, and other

important values can be calculated based on a number of assumptions and design

specifications (Oates, 1997). These assumptions and specifications are as

follows:

Assumptions

o Compression and expansion are isentropic and adiabatic processes

o The working fluid is taken as an ideal gas with constant specific heat specific heat

ratio

o Heat for combustion is assumed to come from an outside source and the fuel mass

is neglected

Specifications

o Compression ratio indicated prior to design

o Ambient air temperature and pressure are known

o An inlet Mach number is indicated

2.4.A. The Brayton Cycle

Jet engines operate as an open Brayton Cycle where a working fluid flows

into a compressor, is combusted, and then exhausted through a turbine (El-

Sayed, 2015). Unlike a closed system, these exhaust gases cannot be

recirculated as they are instead used to generate thrust. Figure 7 represents a

typical open Brayton Cycle where a negligible mass of fuel is injected at the

combustor stage.
Figure 7: Example Geometry of Open Brayton Cycle (Flack, 2005)

The compressor and turbine are connected by a single shaft with an angular

velocity. When considering an aircraft gas turbine, the work of the engine can

be viewed as the change in kinetic energy between the incoming and outgoing

fluid (Oates, 1997). The stages of a gas turbine related to the location on the

engine can be defined as follows:

Table 2: Stages of Gas Turbine Engine


Stage Location

0 Upstream

1 Inlet Entry

2 Compressor Entry

3 Compressor Exit

4 Turbine Entry

5 Turbine Exit

6 Nozzle Entry

7 Nozzle Exit
Figure 8 represent the Brayton Cycle. These temperature-specific

volume, pressure-specific volume, and temperature-entropy diagrams are

commonly used to observe the changes in these properties between different

stages of the engine.

Figure 8: T-v, P-v and T-s Diagrams (MIT, 2014)

The four processes that constitute the Brayton Cycle can be seen in

these diagrams. These processes are:

03 Isentropic Compression

34 Constant Pressure Combustion

48 Isentropic Expansion

80 Constant Pressure Heat Rejection


(Fluid is not recirculated in open
cycle)

The following section introduces the equations related to each component

when observed using the ideal cycle analysis.


2.4.B. Ideal Component Analysis

By determining the pressure and temperature at the first stage of the

cycle, pressures and temperature downstream can be calculated. To achieve this,

these properties are taken as ratios across each component. The ideal analysis for

our engine follows the following equations and can be seen in Appendix A.

𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑡9𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑟𝑒 𝐿𝑒𝑎𝑣9𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡


𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑡9𝑜 () = 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑡9𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟9𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡

𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑡9𝑜𝑛 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝐿𝑒𝑎𝑣9𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡


𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑡9𝑜 () = 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑡9𝑜𝑛 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟9𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡

Inlet

Flow across the inlet is assumed to be isentropic and adiabatic. Throughout

the inlet, there is no change in pressure or temperature and the enthalpy is

constant. Therefore,

𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑃$


𝜋 =
i
𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝐴9𝑟 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 =𝑃-

Equation 9: Pressure Ratio Across Inlet

𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑇$


𝑟 =
i
𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝐴9𝑟 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 =𝑇-

Equation 10: Temperature Ratio Across Inlet


Compressor

The compressor has pressure and temperature ratios that are not constant.

Enthalpy, temperature and pressure increase across the compressor as energy is added to

the
fluid.
𝜋𝑐 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟 𝑃Q
=
𝐸𝑥9𝑡 = 𝑃$
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟
𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦

Equation 11: Pressure Ratio Across Compressor

𝑟𝑐 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟 𝑇Q
=
𝐸𝑥9𝑡 = 𝑇$
𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟
𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦

Equation 12: Temperature Ratio Across Compressor

Because flow is considered isentropic across the compressor, the two ratios

can be related using the following equation:


n
𝜋𝑐 = 𝑟𝑐no1

Equation 13: Compressor T-P Relation (NASA, Compressor Thermodynamics, 2015b)

where,

p = 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐9F9𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡9𝑜

If the pressure ratio across the compressor is specified and the inlet

temperature and pressure are known, the conditions at the exit of the compressor

can be found.

Furthermore, the compressor work can be calculated using the relation:


N𝑐 = 𝑐𝑝(𝑇Q − 𝑇$)

Equation 14: Compressor Work (NASA, Compressor Thermodynamics, 2015b)

where,
𝐾𝐽
𝑐𝑝 = 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐9F9𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑜F 𝑎9𝑟 𝑘𝑔𝐾

Combustor

During combustion pressure remains constant and temperature increases, resulting

in:

𝜋𝑏 = 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑏9𝑛𝑒 𝑃r
𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 = 𝑃Q
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟
𝐸𝑥9𝑡

Equation 15: Pressure Ratio Across Combustor

However, temperature does increase and is calculated using:

𝑟𝑐 = 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑏9𝑛𝑒 𝑇r
𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 = 𝑇Q
𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟
𝐸𝑥9𝑡

Equation 16: Pressure Ratio Across Combustor

The heat input and the minimal fuel requirements for combustion can

be found using Equations 7 and 8 shown in Chapter 2.1.E.

Turbine

Temperature and pressure both drop across the turbine stage due to the fact

that energy is being removed from the fluid in order to rotate the shaft.
𝜋𝑡 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑏9𝑛𝑒 𝑃s
=
𝐸𝑥9𝑡 = 𝑃r
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑏9𝑛𝑒
𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦

Equation 17: Pressure Ratio Across Turbine

𝑟𝑡 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑏9𝑛𝑒 𝑇s
=
𝐸𝑥9𝑡 = 𝑇r
𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑏9𝑛𝑒
𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦

Equation 18: Temperature Ratio Across Turbine

Because flow is also considered isentropic across the turbine, the two

ratios can be related using the following equation:


n
𝜋𝑡 = 𝑟𝑡no1

Equation 19: Turbine T-P Relation (NASA, Turbine Thermodynamics, 2015d)

Furthermore, turbine work can be calculated using the relation:

N𝑡 = 𝑐𝑝(𝑇s − 𝑇r)

Equation 20: Turbine Work (NASA, Turbine Thermodynamics, 2015d)


Nozzle

Flow across the nozzle is also to be assumed isentropic and adiabatic.

𝜋𝑛 = 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑁𝑜𝑧𝑧𝑙𝑒 𝐸𝑥9𝑡 = 𝑃/


𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑁𝑜𝑧𝑧𝑙𝑒 𝑃w
𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒

Equation 21: Pressure Ratio Across Nozzle

𝑟𝑛 = 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑁𝑜𝑧𝑧𝑙𝑒 𝐸𝑥9𝑡 = 𝑇/


𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑁𝑜𝑧𝑧𝑙𝑒 𝑇w
𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒

Equation 22: Temperature Ratio Across Nozzle


3.1 Methodology
This chapter explains how we designed and manufactured each

component of our engine. We present each component and outline the

considerations and challenges encountered during the design process.

Additionally, we discuss the materials and manufacturing methods used to

produce each component. We have included the two-dimensional CAD

drawings of each part in Appendix D.

3.2 Compressor
In order to simplify the design and manufacturing process and complete the

project within the given time constraint, our team decided to purchase a

compressor wheel. After examining the literature regarding compressor wheels

used in small gas turbine engines, we concluded that a single stage axial

compressor would not offer a high enough compression ratio or efficiency to be

used in an engine of our size. Engines similar in size to our own design, such as

the SR-30 described in Chapter 2.2, utilize a centrifugal compressor in order to

achieve adequate compression ratios and efficiencies. For these reasons, we chose

to investigate centrifugal compressor wheels used in automotive turbochargers.

We found that the Garret GT4202 compressor wheel provided a mass flow rate

and pressure ratio, at our desired RPM, similar to those recorded in SR30 test data

(Witkowski, White, Ortize Duenas, Strykowski, & Simon, 2003). Additional

benefits of selecting this compressor were its availability for purchasing and the

accessibility

of its compressor map. The compressor map for the GT4202 can be seen in Figure 9.
Figure 9: GT4202 Compressor Map (Limit Engineering, 2015)

The GT4202 incorporates a curved profile on the diffuser side. We quickly

realized that removing the profile and machining the diffuser side flat would allow

us to more easily match this compressor to a diffuser without the need to match

this unknown profile. Therefore, we decided to machine the diffuser side flat using

a manual mill. Pictures of the altered GT4202 compressor attached to the shaft can

be seen in Figure 10.


Figure 10: G4202 Attached to Drive Shaft

3.3 Inlet Shroud


The primary challenge we faced while integrating the GT4202 compressor

into our engine design was obtaining the profile of the rotating compressor wheel.

Computer Aided Design (CAD) models of the compressor are proprietary and

unavailable to consumers. However, it was essential that we find these dimensions

in order to design an inlet shroud. The space between the compressor blades and

the inlet shroud cannot exceed 40/1000 of an inch and to achieve reasonable

efficiencies, should be as small as possible (Kamps, 2005). Therefore, our team

was forced to find a way of designing a shroud to meet this high tolerance.
After considering the use of a Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) as

well as an Optical Comparator, we determined the best course of action was to

obtain a 3D scan of the compressor. We reached out to a company in Windsor,

Connecticut called Capture 3D, their staff donated their time, equipment, and

expertise to generate a stereolithographic (STL) file of our compressor wheel.

We then imported this STL file into SolidWorks. In order to design the inlet

shroud to match the curvature of the rotating compressor profile, we drew

concentric circles around the fins of the compressor and connected them with a

spline. Rotating this spline around a centerline generated a surface matching the

compressor profile. By offsetting this surface, we were able to design an inlet

shroud that is within the acceptable tolerance.

The shroud was machined from a six-inch bar stock of 6061 t651

aluminum and was turned on a Computer Numerical Control (CNC) lathe in the

Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) Washburn Shops. A total of sixteen bolt

holes were drilled around the perimeter of the shroud in order to facilitate

assembly. The completed inlet shroud can be seen below in Figure 11.
Figure 11: Inlet Shroud

3.4 Diffuser
The first decision to be made when designing the diffuser stage was which

diffuser style to choose: veined or channel. After reviewing the literature on small

gas turbine engines and other similar designs, we chose the wedged channel

diffuser design. This same style diffuser was used successfully in the KJ66

engine.

Additionally, the wedges provide a convenient location to drill bolt holes in order

to fasten the inlet shroud. Considering the diffuser does not experience extremely

high temperatures, we decided to machine it from 6061 t651 Aluminum.

Aluminum provided us with adequate strength for the components purpose, while

enabling an easier machining process.


We machined the part on a Haas VM-2 vertical milling machine. After the

operation to machine the wedges was completed, we drilled the holes with a

separate CNC program and hand tapped the holes. In order to machine the vanes

on the side of the diffuser, we fixed the stock in an indexing head and moved the

indexing head a determined angle evenly properly locate the fins. Finally, we

implemented a program to machine the holes on certain fins. The completed

diffuser can be seen in Figure 12.

Figure 12: Channel Diffuser


3.5 Combustion Chamber
Based on the literature reviewed, our team decided to manufacture an

annular combustion chamber. Annular combustion chambers allow the

manufacturer to create an engine of smaller diameter, which we found to be

desirable. Additionally, we determined utilizing another combustion chamber

design, such as the can combustor, would have provided a more substantial

manufacturing challenge. Because most combustor design is based off empirical

data, and we were not focused on optimizing a design, we decided to model our

combustor after successful combustion chambers that have been widely

implemented on turbocharger based amateur gas turbine engines.

Our combustion chamber design incorporates an outer line and inner flame

tube. Both of which contain 3 separate zones of holes. Primary, secondary, and

tertiary holes in the combustor that assist the mixing of air and fuel. Due to its

ability with withstand extremely high temperatures, we chose to manufacture our

combustion chamber out of Inconel 625. A local company donated a 0.02-inch-

thick sheet of the material which we then cut into four pieces. We rolled two

pieces into the inner flame tube and outer line while the remaining two pieces

were cut into two annular end caps. We then welded eight vaporization tubes,

about 5 inches long and ¼ inch diameter, to the turbine side endcap. Finally, the

two caps were welded to the outer line and the compressor side cap was welded to

the flame tube, completing the assembly. An image of the completed combustion

chamber can be seen in Figure 13.


Figure 13: Combustion Chamber

3.6 Shaft Housing


We designed the shaft housing to accommodate the shaft and bearing

dimensions. There is substantial flexibility regarding the design of the housing

outer profile, various models can be seen throughout the world of miniature gas

turbines. We decided to go with a simple, straight profile that widens at one end to

allow space for bolt holes to fix the housing to the diffuser. The inner tube

incorporates two bearing seats. The bearing seat at the diffuser end, which can be

seen in Figure 14, accommodates half of the bearing thickness. When bolted to the

diffuser, the shaft housing sandwiches the bearing halfway between the diffuser

and
the housing. The turbine end bearing seat is designed to allow space for a spring

and sleeve system which places ten pounds of preload on the bearing. The

purpose of this system is to increase the longevity of the bearing when

experiencing high rotational speeds and temperatures near the turbine.

The shaft housing was manufactured from a three-inch diameter, 6061 t651

aluminum rod. We first drilled and then bored the inside diameter to accompany

the shafts dimensions. We then drilled and bored the inner area on the turbine side

to accommodate the sleeve spring system and turned down the outside. The

component was then flipped, centered and then bored and turned again to achieve

the features on the compressor side. Finally, eight holes were drilled on the base

on the shaft housing in order to fixture it to the diffuser. The completed shaft

housing can be seen in Figure 14.

Figure 14: Shaft Housing


3.7 Fuel Distributer
The purpose of the fuel distributor is to transport fuel from an outside

source into the vaporization tubes of the combustion chamber. We chose a simple

distributor designed similar to those seen in many small gas turbines. The

distributor consists of eight, 0.08-inch diameter fuel injectors mounted normal to

our ¼ inch injector ring. Each injector is matched to a corresponding vaporization

tube on the turbine side endcap of the combustion chamber. The injector ring sits

on the outside of this endcap where it is held in place by the stator housing.

Tubing connects to the ring which runs alongside the length of the combustion

chamber and through the outer case of the engine. It is here where the distributor

connects to an outside fuel source.

The fuel distributor was manufactured entirely from 316 stainless steel

tubing. We first cut and rolled the larger tubing to make the five-inch diameter

injector ring. Next, we drilled eight 0.08-inch diameter holes in the injector ring

to accommodate the fuel injectors. An additional hole was drilled perpendicular

to these holes for the fuel supply line. We then cut eight, 0.08-inch diameter fuel

injectors each 3 inches in length. We determined that conventional welding

methods would not be feasible due to the small diameter and wall thickness of

the tubing. Therefore, we decided to reach out to a local company with laser

welding capabilities. They agreed to weld the assembly together and the

resulting fuel distributor can be seen in Figure 15.


Figure 15: Fuel Distributor

3.8 Turbine
The development of airfoils and turbines for new engines is a subject of

years of study and it was impossible to design and test our own original airfoils.

Therefore, to simplify turbine design we chose the NACA 23012, a common

airfoil used for turbine blades. In order to ensure that the turbine rotor could

handle the centrifugal forces experiences at high angular velocities, the stress at

the roots of the blade were calculated and compared to the allowable tensile

strength of the material. These stress calculations can be found in appendix B.

The turbine was initially designed to be machined from Inconel 718 four-

inch bar stock due to the materials ability to maintain strength during high

temperature rotation. In order to achieve the desired airfoil geometry and a curved

channel floor between fins, we attempted to complete the machining operation in a

mill with 5- axis capability. However, our first attempts at machining the Inconel

proved quite
difficult. Machining the channels between our fins required a 1/8” end mill. From

speaking with WPI shop staff and consulting popular online machinist forums, we

found that it is nearly impossible to avoid breaking 1/8” carbide end mills while

machining Inconel for an extended period. We considered a variety of feeds and

speeds, lubrication techniques, and tool paths in order to design a more efficient

machining procedure for the turbine fins. However, we eventually determined

that machining our turbine from Inconel 718 would incur too great of a financial

cost and consume more than an acceptable amount of our time table.

The failure of the Inconel turbine consumed an excessive amount of our time.

Our initial attempts to machine the turbine from the Nickel super-alloy resulted in

multiple broken end mills per blade and the machining operation was calculated

to take upwards of twenty hours. In retrospect, we became too attached to the

idea of using Inconel and committed to troubleshooting the problem instead of

making an early decision to change the material. Eventually, we decided to

machine the turbine from a disk of 316 stainless steel thus greatly reducing the

machining time, tooling cost, and difficulty.

The primary change in design, apart from the material, was a transition

from a curved channel floor to a flat channel floor. The ramifications of this

change are likely to be a slight decrease in efficiency due to the sharper edge of

the blade channels. Additionally, 316 stainless steel does not maintain strength at

elevated temperature as well as Inconel. Therefore, the change also decreased the

turbines critical rotational speed. On the positive end, this decision decreased our

machine
time, machining cost, and labor. However, after we completed the turbine and

attached it to our shaft, we realized that the turbine was slightly asymmetrical.

We determined the most likely cause of asymmetry in the turbine to be a

failure in properly fixturing the component during CNC operations, resulting in

the stock piece being not perfectly centered in the lathe chuck. As a result, the

turbine blades on one side of the disk were machined approximately 20/1000 in

shorter than those on the other side. Due to the difference in the length of the

blades, we were forced to either re-machine the rotor or remove 20/1000 in from

the overall diameter. We determined that we did not have enough time to machine

a second turbine and decided to repair the original. The resulting turbine, prior to

balancing, produced substantially less vibration when spun with compressed.

However, the alterations to the blade length resulted in a gap between the turbine

and the stator housing of 30/1000 in. The specified tolerance between these two

parts was 10/1000 in in order to achieve minimal gap losses and maximize

efficiency.

Although the turbine will be adequate for operation it is not ideal and will suffer

from unnecessary gap loss during operation. The completed turbine wheel

attached to the shaft can be seen in Figure 16.


Figure 16: Axial Turbine

3.9 Outer Casing & Inlet Flange


Perhaps the simplest component to design was the outer casing. A six-inch

diameter tube with eight bolt holes placed around the circumference of the

compressor side. Bolts passing through these holes secure the inlet flange, outer

casing and diffuser into a rigid body and ensure that the spacing between

compressor and shroud is maintained. While the compressor end is enclosed by

the compressor and inlet shroud assembly, the turbine end is enclosed by the

stator housing and an annular endcap.


We chose to manufacture the outer housing from a six-inch outer diameter

length of 304 stainless steel tubing. The primary challenge during manufacturing

was properly holding the tube on a lathe in order to machine the outer and inner

diameters. Due to the size and length of the tube, we decided to use a four-jaw

chuck to hold it from the inside. We encountered a large amount of deflection and

chatter while turning down the outer diameter. To solve this problem, we welded

a piece of steel across the inside diameter of one end of the tubing. We then

center drilled the piece of steel and utilized a tailstock and live center to reduce

deflection and ensure a uniform surface finish. Following the turning operation

on the outer diameter, we flipped the tube and bored the inside to the exact outer

radius of the diffuser fins. Once the tube diameters were properly sized, we

drilled eight holes around the circumference of the diffuser end and welded an

annular endcap to the turbine side. The primary feature of the annular endcap is

to allow for the attachment of the nozzle. The outer housing can be seen in

Figure 17.

Figure 17: Outer Casing


We also designed and manufactured a simple inlet flange to cover the

compressor side of the outer casing and hold the assembly, and engine, together.

We designed the flange to fit loosely over the outer casing to allow proper spacing

for gasket material. Bolt holes placed around the perimeter of the flange line up

with holes on the casing and diffuser. We machined the flange from 7-in diameter

6061 t651 aluminum stock. The machining operation was performed on a HAAS

VM-2 utilizing Esprit. We used ½-in end mills to pocket the material and a 3-in

face mill in order to give it a flat surface finish. We also drilled the holes on the

side using

an indexing head and the manual mill. The completed flange can be seen in figure 18.

Figure 18: Inlet Flange


Minimizing gap losses and ensuring a tightly sealed engine is crucial to the

efficiency of gas turbines. In addition to the turbine, the seal between the outer

casing and the flange is an area of concern for gap losses in our engine. Because

the flange is bolted to the housing, it is necessary to implement a gasket between

the two parts in order to eliminate any leaks. We initially decided to use gasket

paper between the two parts but once the engine was assembled we found that the

gasket paper did not provide a reliable seal. We decided that a simpler method

might be to seal the gap with a high temperature silicon gasket sealer. The silicon

sealer can better fill any small gaps or leaks that might be formed in gasket paper

when securing the flange.

3.10 Shaft

After reviewing various shaft designs used in similar engines, such as

the KJ66 and SR30, we decided to use a design very similar to the KJ 66. Our

engine is slightly larger than the KJ 66 therefore, we scaled up the shaft design

while maintaining the overall style.

The shaft, made of 316 stainless steel, was cut to about 11.5-in in length

and then turned down on a lathe to meet our specifications. The design includes a

taper on each side of the shaft intended to decrease stress concentrations and

eliminate the sharp edges that might infringe upon lubricant flow through the shaft

housing. There are two locator steps/bearing seats that serve to position the

bearings on each end, these steps are machined to allow a light press fit upon

bearing installation. In order to ensure that the shaft was manufactured to be

concentric
and as balanced as possible, we utilized an indicator to establish a true rotation in

the chuck whenever the workpiece needed to be manipulated. Additionally,

during any turning operations the shaft was held by a live center tailstock to

minimize the chances of deflection and inaccuracies. To complete the shaft, we

cut left hand threads into each end in order to accommodate the turbine and

compressor. The shaft can be seen in Figure 19.

Figure 19: Shaft Assembly


3.11 Stator & Stator Housing
The stator housing was designed to be machined from 316 stainless steel

bar stock. The primary purpose of the housing is to hold the stator in place and

allow the turbine to rotate at full speed while maintaining the high tolerance

necessary for efficiency. We designed a simple geometry which includes a simple

thin walled hollow cylinder with a flange on either end. The flanges provide

surfaces where the combustion chamber and exhaust nozzle can be attached. On

the combustion side, the flange was designed to be welded to the combustion

chamber while the nozzle could be attached with bolts feeding through small tabs

on the nozzle and into the housing.

The stator was machined in the same fashion as the turbine. Once, we

machined the stator as a bladed disk, we then installed the disk into the stator

housing and welded the blades to the outer walls. The stator housing was

machined using 35° and 55° ferrous inserts and a ferrous boring bar to bore out

the inner diameter. We then drilled holes on the sides of the housing evenly so

that the holes would line up with the blades in order to plug weld the stator inside

of the housing. We machined a small lip so that the stator could sit inside of the

housing before it was plug welded. The completed stator and stator housing

assembly can be seen in Figure 21.


Figure 21: Stator and Stator Housing

3.12 Exhaust Nozzle


The primary function of an aircraft gas turbine exhaust nozzle is to
generate thrust used to propel the aircraft forward (El-Sayed, 2015). This project
focused on the design and manufacturing of a self-sustaining engine and we did
not prioritize thrust. Our nozzle design objectives were to avoid choked flow and
ensure ease of manufacturing. Therefore, we decided to choose a simple
converging nozzle design derived from a popular RC jet turbine, the KJ-66. Our
nozzle consists of a short outer cone with a 15-degree taper and a longer yet
smaller in diameter inner
cone. Additionally, we included eight tabs on the perimeter of the outer cone that
allow the nozzle to be bolted to the stator housing and outer casing. All of the
components are manufactured from Inconel 718 sheet metal.
We used SolidWorks to create a model of the nozzle and generate a 2-
dimensional template of the cones which we then transferred to a 0.02-in thick
sheet of Inconel. We cut the sheet into two shapes, one for each cone, and tig
welded them together. The outside cone was then bolted onto the casing using
the tabs. The nozzle can be seen in Figure 20.

Figure 20: Nozzle


3.13 Bearings, Fuel Injection, and Lubrication
In order to build and operate an engine, it is essential to first consider the

bearing, fuel, and lubrication that will keep rotating components moving

efficiently. During the first stages of our design process we determined that it

would not be feasible to design and build the ball bearings or the fuel and oil

pumps. Through research regarding bearings used by RC jet modelers and

manufacturers of small gas turbines, we identified a set of bearings that would be

capable of withstanding the extreme temperatures and rotational speeds to be

experienced in our engine.

The bearings we chose are specifically offered, by BOCA Bearing, for miniature

jet turbines, they are stainless steel/ceramic hybrid angular contact bearings

capable of withstanding RPM up to 100,000 with proper lubrication.

Originally, the combustion chamber was designed specifically to

accommodate liquid fuels through the use of the vaporization tubes. However, it

became apparent later in the design process that we would be unable to purchase

and assemble a fuel pump and throttle system within the allotted timeframe and

budget. However, our engine is capable of running on multiple fuels, both liquid

and gaseous. Therefore, we decided to run the engine on gaseous fuel in order to

eliminate the need for a fuel pump and achieve throttling through the use of a

valve. The theoretical minimal fuel consumption calculation using propane can be

seen in Appendix C.

In order to ensure that the bearings would not fail at high rotational

speeds and temperatures during operation, we incorporated a bearing lubrication


system into our design. The system consists of two ¼in stainless steel entering
through the outer casing, running along the blackface of the diffuser, and entering

the shaft housing at the location of each bearing. We also purchased an oil pump

to push oil from a reservoir into the engine. The lubrication design can be seen in

Figure 21.

Figure 21: Lubrication System


4.1 Conclusions and Recommendations

Over the course of this project we successfully designed and manufactured

all twelve of the components outlined in Chapter 1 that constitute our jet engine.

Additionally, we successfully assembled the engine. Figure 22 at the end of this

section show the nozzle and compressor ends of the dry fit assembly. However,

due to substantial manufacturing setbacks we were unable to test the engine

before the deadline. These setbacks included the failed Inconel turbine and steel

turbine asymmetry.

In order to complete the manufacturing aspect of our project, we

postponed our plans to manufacture a test stand, balance the shaft assembly,

create a throttle mechanism, and seal the engine for operation.

In order to operate our engine by the end of this academic year, we plan to

continue working towards creating the necessary components. We have contacted

a local company specializing in balancing rotating components and they agreed to

balance our shaft assembly. Creating a throttle mechanism for our engine has been

simplified by the use of gaseous fuel. We plan to use an adjustable valve that

controls the flow of propane therefore increasing or decreasing throttle. To ensure

our engine is properly sealed, we will abandon the use of gasket paper and employ

a high temperature silicon gasket sealer around the flange during final assembly.

Finally, we plan to construct a simple static engine stand that will support the

engine during operation and safeguard operators in the event of engine

failure.

Despite our setbacks and failure to operate the engine in the given
timeframe, we are working to complete the engine before the end of this academic

year.
order to provide assistance to any future project groups interested in

manufacturing their own miniature gas turbine, we have provided a list of

recommendations that will expedite the design and manufacturing process and

possibly facilitate the integration of instrumentation, thrust considerations, and

efficiency into their design.

 We recommend avoiding super alloys, like Inconel 718, when constructing a

turbine unless the group has access to proper CNC tooling and equipment and

experience machining with other similar alloys.

 We recommend that when selecting or manufacturing a compressor, ensure a

CAD model is available. A CAD model enables the use of computer software to

quickly design a compressor inlet shroud that meets tolerances necessary for

engine efficiency.

 We recommend further research into flange design in order to create a flange

that can integrate gasket material and ensure a proper, reliable seal.

Reflecting on the process we have gone through during the design and

manufacturing of our engine has led us to realize the difficulties of designing and

building an original engine. Many design advancements in gas turbines have

been developed through experimentation and iteration. The design of any

component manufactured during this project could be challenging enough to

warrant a project of equal magnitude. Years of research and development could

be spent designing a turbine blade or new combustion chamber. Additionally, the

volume of research and information regarding gas turbines is simply immense

and often difficult to


navigate. Considering these factors, it becomes evident that our project was quite

ambitious. However, through our struggles, we gained first-hand knowledge of

gas turbines and the challenges faced during their design and manufacturing.

Figure 22: Nozzle (left) and Compressor (right) Views of Assembly


References
Aviation. (2015, June 23). Aviation. Retrieved from Stack Exchange:
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/16177/what-are-the-
differences-between-a-helicopter-engine-turboshaft-and-an-aircraf

Benini, E., & Giacometti, S. (2007). Design, Manufacturing and Operation of a


Small Turbojet-engine for Research Purposes. Applied Energy, 1102-
1116.

Boyce, M. P. (2012). Gas Turbine Engineering Handbook (4th ed.).


Amsterdam:Boston: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.

Britannica, E. (2018). Afterburner. Retrieved from Enyclopedia


Britannica : https://www.britannica.com/technology/afterburner-
mechanical- engineering

Demirel, Y. (2012). Energy: Production, Conversion, Storage, Conservation, and


Coupling. Lincoln, NE: Springer.

El-Sayed, A. F. (2015). Aircraft Propulsion and Gas Turbine Engines . Boca Raton:
CRC Press.

Flack, R. (2005). Fundamentals of Jet Propulsion with Applications. Cambridge, UK:


Cambridge University Press.

Garret. (2017). Compressor Maps. Retrieved from Honeywell Garret:


https://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/compressor_maps

Hill, P. G., & Peterson, C. R. (1992). Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Propulsion.


Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

Hunecke, K. (1997). Jet Engines: Fundamentals of Theory Design and Operation.


Osceola, WI: Motorbooks International Publishers & Wholesalers.

Kamps, T. (2005). Model Jet Engines (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: Traplet Publications.

Limit Engineering. (2015). Garret Turbo Products GT4202. Retrieved from Limit
Engineering:
http://www.limitengineering.com/Turbos/GT4202/GT4202.html

Ling, J., Wong, K., & Armfield, S. (2007). Numerical Investigation of a Small Gas
Turbine Compressor. 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (pp. 961-
966). Brisbane: School of Engineering, The Univerity of Queensland.
Macisaac, B., & Langton, R. (2011). Gas Turbine Propulsion Systems. Chichester, UK:
Wiley.

Mattingly, J. D. (2000). Elements of Propulsion: Gas Turbines & Rockets. American


Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

MIT. (2014). Applications of the First Law to Heat Engines. Retrieved from MIT:
http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/chapter_5.htm

Mukinutalapati, N. R. (2011). Advances in Gas Turbine Technology. InTech.

NASA. (1973). Design Handbook for Gaseous Fuel Engine Injectors and
Combustion Chambers. United States.

NASA. (2015a, May 5). Compressor. Retrieved from NASA:


https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/compress.html

NASA. (2015b, May 5). Compressor Thermodynamics. Retrieved from NASA:


https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/compth.html

NASA. (2015c). Turbojet Engine. Retrieved from NASA:


http://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/aturbj.html

NASA. (2015d). Turbine Thermodynamics. Retrieved from NASA:


https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/powtrbth.html

npower. (2009). Forces on Large Steam Turbine Blades. The Royal Academy of
Engineering. RWE npower.

Oates, G. C. (1997). Aerothermodynamics of Gas Turbines and Rocket Propulsion .


Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Shreckling, K. (1992). Gas Turbines for Model Aircraft. United Kingdom: Traplet
Publications.

Smith, C. W. (1956). Aircraft Gas Turbines. New York: John Wiley & Sons,

Inc. Stricker, J. M. (1998). The Gas Turbine Engine Conceptual Design Process

- An
Integrated Approach. Wright-Patterson AFB, Air Force Research Laboratory.

Thrust. (1985). In Dictionary of Physics. New York: Warner Books.

Witkowski, T., White, S., Ortize Duenas, C., Strykowski, P., & Simon, T.

(2003).
Characterizing the Performance of the SR-30 Turbojet Engine. University of
Minnesota.
APPENDIX A: Ideal Cycle Analysis
Appendix B: Turbine Blade Stress
Appendix C: Fuel Consumption Calculation
DESIGN OF MINIATURE TURBOJET 84
ENGINE

Appendix D: CAD Drawings

Shaft 2 1

B B

11.486
2.701 6.504 1.020 .748
.327 .787 .935
.394

.572

.315
. .394
315

A UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DATE

DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES


TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL
DRAWN

CHECKED TITLE:
A
Shaft
ANGULAR: MACH BEND
ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL MFG APPR.
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS
TOLERANCING PER:
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF COMMENTS:
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY MATERIAL
SIZE DWG. NO. REV

A
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A
WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN
FINISH
PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS NEXT ASSY USED ON

PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:4 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1
DESIGN OF MINIATURE TURBOJET 85
ENGINE
2
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only. 1
Shaft Housing
2 1

B B
7.697
2.241 4.61 .515
1.388 .360
B 6X .13 THRU 2.89
M4X0.7 - 6H THRU .427

1.165
.782 1.026

B
SECTION B-B

A UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DATE

DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES


TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL
DRAWN

CHECKED TITLE:
A
Shaft Housing
ANGULAR: MACH BEND ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL MFG APPR.
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.
TOLERANCING PER: COMMENTS:
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS
NEXT ASSY USED ON
FINISH
A
PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:2 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1
2
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only. 1
Combustion Chamber
2 1

40X .164 THRU ALL


11X .253 THRU ALL

B 14X .441 THRU ALL


9X .441 THRU ALL B
17X .253 THRU ALL
60X .164 THRU ALL 12X .236 5.118 5.197
5.197 R2.250 3.541 .039
2.587 5.984 2.587 5.079
A

.039

A
SECTION A-A
SCALE 1 : 3
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DATE

A DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES


TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL
DRAWN

CHECKED
TITLE: A
Combustion
ANGULAR: MACH BEND
ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL MFG APPR.

PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL


INTERPRET GEOMETRIC
TOLERANCING PER:
Q.A.
COMMENTS:
Chamber
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS
NEXT ASSY USED ON
FINISH
A
PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:4 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1

SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For 2 Instructional Use Only. 1


Outer Casing
2 1

6.620
4.000
8X .197 THRU
3.424
A
.050 8.887
B B

A
SECTION A-A
SCALE 1 : 2

A UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:

DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES DRAWN


NAME DATE

A
TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL CHECKED TITLE:
ANGULAR: MACH
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL
BEND ENG APPR.

MFG APPR.
Casing
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.
TOLERANCING PER: COMMENTS:
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS
NEXT ASSY USED ON
FINISH
A
PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:4 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For 2 Instructional Use Only. 1

Turbine Wheel
2
1
56.92°
R.04

R.02
54.97°

SECTION B-B
B SCALE 1 : 1.5 B
B B
.71 .20
A .20

.31

3.50 2.19 2.59

<INSERT
COMPANY ASSY ON FIED: H
HERE>

A DIMENSIONS ARE IN
INCHES TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL
U ANGULAR: MACH

A
N
LE
S BEND TWO PLACE
S DECIMAL THREE PLACE
O DECIMAL
T
H INTERPRET GEOMETRIC
E TOLERANCING PER:
R MATE
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL W
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS IS
RIAL
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF E
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY S
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE PE FINIS
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF NEXT USED CI
A S
E
SCALE
1: DWG.
bine
C 1.5 NO.
T
T
NAME DATE

DRAWN CHECKED ENG APPR. I A


O
u
MFG APPR. Q.A. COMMENTS: TITLE:
N

A
-
r
SIZE A REV
PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:1 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1

2
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only. 1

Stator & Stator Housing


2
1
R.049
12.000°

R.030

49.184°

B SECTION B-B

2.587
B
1.417
.100 1.217 2.193
1.389
B A
B
.098

20X .125 THRU

4.600 4.150 3.570


A
SECTION A-A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DATE

A DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES


TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL
DRAWN

CHECKED TITLE:
A
ANGULAR: MACH BEND ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL MFG APPR.

INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.


PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
TOLERANCING PER:
COMMENTS:
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MATERIAL SIZE REV
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF DWG. NO.
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS
NEXT ASSY USED ON
FINISH
A Stator 2
PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:2 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1

SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For 2 Instructional Use Only. 1


Diffuser 2 1

5.55
5.00
4.27
1.82
4X .20 THRU ALL
A 6.64°
B 1/4-20 UNC THRU ALL .26
B
19.00°

.35
R.04

6.34 4.27 4.04 .60 1.023 5.31


2X R.03

16X .15 THRU ALL


6X .19 THRU
10-24 UNC THRU ALL
.31 .20
A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DATE SECTION A-A

A DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES


TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL
DRAWN

CHECKED TITLE:
A
DIFFUSER
ANGULAR: MACH BEND
ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL .01
THREE PLACE DECIMAL .003 MFG APPR.

INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.


PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TOLERANCING PER:
COMMENTS:
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV
6061-T6511 ALUMINUM
A
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE FINISH
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF NEXT ASSY USED ON
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS
PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:2 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1
2
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only. 1
Compressor Shroud
2 1

5.560
B 1.100
4.053 B
.100 .409
3.141
16X .189 THRU ALL

R2.500

A UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DAT

A
E
DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES DRAWN
TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL CHECKED TITLE:

Compressor
ANGULAR: MACH BEND
ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL

Shroud
MFG APPR.
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TOLERANCING PER:
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF COMMENTS:
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV

A
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS FINISH
NEXT ASSY USED ON

PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:4 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1

SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For 2 Instructional Use Only. 1


Inlet Flange

2 1
6.82
5.00
B A
4.50

.95

B
R.25

16X .19 THRU ALL


A 1.40
SECTION A-A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DATE

A DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES


TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL
DRAWN

CHECKED TITLE:
A
ANGULAR: MACH BEND
ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL MFG APPR.

INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.


PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TOLERANCING PER:
COMMENTS:
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV

A Flange
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY
FINISH
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE NEXT ASSY USED ON
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS
PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:2 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1

SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For 2 Instructional Use Only. 1


Outer Nozzle
2 1

1.287

B B
7.32°

3.434 3.063

A UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DAT

A
E
DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES DRAWN
TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL CHECKED TITLE:

PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL


ANGULAR: MACH
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL
BEND
ENG APPR.

MFG APPR.
Outer Nozzle
INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.
TOLERANCING PER:
COMMENTS:
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV

A
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE FINISH
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF NEXT ASSY USED ON
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS
PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:2 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1
2
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only. 1
Inner Nozzle
2 1

4.000

B B
15.283°

2.586 .400

A UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DAT

A
E
DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES DRAWN
TOLERANCES:
FRACTIONAL CHECKED TITLE:

Inner Nozzle
ANGULAR: MACH BEND
ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL
THREE PLACE DECIMAL MFG APPR.
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS
TOLERANCING PER:
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF COMMENTS:
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV

A
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS FINISH
NEXT ASSY USED ON

PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:2 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1

SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For 2 Instructional Use Only. 1


Engine Assembly
2 1

B B

C C
SECTION C-C
SCALE 1 : 2

A UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DATE

DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES


TOLERANCES:
DRAWN

TITLE:
A
Turbine
FRACTIONAL CHECKED
ANGULAR: MACH BEND
ENG APPR.
TWO PLACE DECIMAL

Assembly
THREE PLACE DECIMAL MFG APPR.
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
INTERPRET GEOMETRIC Q.A.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TOLERANCING PER:
DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF COMMENTS:
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE>. ANY MATERIAL SIZE DWG. NO. REV

A
REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
<INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE> IS FINISH
NEXT ASSY USED ON

PROHIBITED.
APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SCALE: 1:8 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 1
2
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only. 1
External Examiner

You might also like