Design and Construction of Assembled Multipurpose Shelter

Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Tarlac City
Design and Construction of Assembled

Multipurpose Shelter
In Partial Fulfillment of the

Requirements for the Degree of
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
Submitted by:
Balanza, Sarena Angelic G.
Caranto, Genrev T.
Dadulla, Debenito Jr. C.
Nagum, Wilfred Jr. N.
CE 5B
Submitted to:
Engr. Marie Wendy J. Frany
Subject Professor
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, different ways on how to make things more convenient have been the trend. People
have been craving for things that are instant. With this reason, the researchers conducted this
study about the design and construction of an assembled multipurpose shelter that can be used as
mini office, outdoor shelter, and calamity victim temporary shelter.
This study introduces a shelter that is assembled, mobile, and has carefully studied features that
can withstand different types of loads. It is greatly influenced by existing modular houses and
will be modified in terms of materials, strength, and economy aspects.
The primary purpose of this study is to provide a temporary shelter for calamity affected families.
In collaboration with the MDRRMO (Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
Office) – Gerona, the researchers have come up to propose the idea in times of unwanted
happenings based on the following data gathered.
Based on the hazard profiling and characterization and historical occurrences in the Gerona
Disaster Assessment Report, the Municipality of Gerona is vulnerable to the hydro
meteorological and geological hazards such as flooding, typhoons, earthquake related hazards
like ground shaking and liquefaction as well as volcanic related hazards like ash fall and lahar
flows.
Flooding is a perennial problem in the low lying barangays of the municipality. During the rainy
season, communities located near the Tarlac River are usually inundated when the bank of this
river overflows.
The said disasters have resulted significant losses in terms of casualties, millions worth of
damages, several government policies, and disruption of economic activities, and more. These
disasters remain unavoidable threats for human lives, and when these calamities occur,
collapsing of houses is one of the most significant losses. Therefore, providing shelter or
temporary shelter for the victims is an urgent and critical task.
Since the municipality of Gerona is facing problems on the availability of evacuation centers, the
researchers came up with the study on designing a comfortable, lightweight, durable, and mobile
temporary shelters for the calamity victims.

OBJECTIVES
The study aimed to fabricate a detachable cylindrical modular house which has a good wind
resistance and reduced surface area that will serve as a modular shelter for calamity victims.
Specifically, to analyze the frame system and to withstand the different loads of the
proposed modular house.
SIGNIFICANCE
The design can be used as an alternative to the existing temporary shelters. It may be a more
effective shelter for calamity affected families. It may also help other researchers to improve the
idea and concept of temporary houses as well as to find more essential materials for better results.
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION
This study is delimited to the design and fabrication of detachable. The house had a floor area of
7.68 square meters good for 3-5 persons. Plumbing fixtures and electrical wirings were not
included in the design.

DEFINITION OF TERMS
1. Modular buildings and modular homes areprefabricated buildingsorhousesthat consist
of repeated sections called modules.
2. Calamity - an event causing great and often sudden damage or distress; a disaster.
3. Structural loads or actions areforces,deformations, oraccelerationsapplied
tostructurecomponents.
4. A frame is often a structural system that supports other components of a physical
construction and/or steel frame that limits the construction's extent.
5. Developmental research has been defined as the systematic study of designing,
developing, and evaluating instructional programs, processes, and products that must
meet criteria of internal consistency and effectiveness.
6. A floor plan is a drawing to scale, showing a view from above, of the relationships
between rooms, spaces, traffic patterns, and other physical features at one level of a
structure.
7. Structural analysis is the determination of the effects ofloadson physicalstructuresand
theircomponents.
8. Fabrication is the process of making something from semi-finished or raw materials
rather than from ready-made components.

CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This research study cited accounts that hold different concepts, ideas, generalizations or
conclusions, and various developments related to the study which are used by the researchers as
guide in planning and designing the project.
After a disaster occurs, number of houses are damaged or destroyed and re-housing of homeless
people is one of the important tasks of reconstruction programs. Reconstruction works often
lastlong, and during that time, it is essential to provide victims a temporary shelter until their
original homes are repaired or replaced.
The current shelters mostly are difficult and time- consuming to be erected and also they are
usually made of heavy materials. Many of them are not foldable in a configurable geometrical
order which make their transportation more difficult and their storage for future use is mostly
problematic. All of these mean that there is a necessity for the development of lightweight and
transportable units that are able to meet different expectations and requirements and have the
ability to be store for future use and be deployed in a short period of time (Ergunay,1999).
According to Asefi (2010) designing a deployable and temporary shelter with a foldable
mechanism to be used in different situations requires a great understanding of the geometric

conditions of the connected elements. This understanding will determine whether or not the
proposed structure can actually be deployed in a compact state. In mobile shelter system
proposed in this paper, we had 4 basic goals which are summarized as:1-The ability to be folded
and opened in a simple way and in a very short period of time (Ease of transportation),
2Expansion and flexibility, 3-Compactability and ease of erection and durability of the structural
and covering materials,4-Good visual appearance. The proposed shelter can be used in disastrous
area to temporarily settle the survivors. It also can be used for temporary exhibitions or for the
covered camping spaces. This structure can differ in size and material in term of different usage
and scale. It is lightweight and uses modular components that can be replaced, repaired and
stored in a short period of time.
The proposed structure has the capability to be expanded by adding more space to its ends and
sides. Considering that triangle is a stable form, this shelter consists of triangular parts which are
moveable both on upper rails and the rails on which modules can be moved and opened in a
sliding mechanism on the field. This system can meet different topographical and environmental
conditions and also different functions.
The proposed structure can be folded to a small bundle for ease of transportation. The whole unit
can be closed in a very simple way by moving each major module toward inside and under the
following module. Each 2-side triangular unit runs through wheels on an inclined rail which is
placed on the both side of the structure. In order to develop the proposed design and optimize it
functionally, the sides of every module can be curved so that the operational space of the inside
of each module can be improved. The shelter with flat elements is changed to the shelter with
curved parts and although apparently their movement mechanisms are similar, there are some
structural differences between them in terms of the way the force is transferred to the foundation.
In the module with curved components the structural stability is improved as well as the
architectural functionality of the interior space.
A recent study was conducted by Briones, et al. in the year 2018 which entitled “Design and
Construction of a Prefabricated Modular House”. The study aims to fabricate a detachable house
that will serve as a temporary shelter for calamity victims. Specifically, designed to withstand the
given loads using Frame System Analysis and Wind Load Analysis.
The proposed shelter has an inclined height of 3.4 meters and 2.9 meters from the base support to
the ridge of the roof and has a width of 2.4 meters and length of 3.6 meters when assembled. The
main floor has a dimension of 2.4 meters by 3.6 meters, with a floor area of 8.64 square meters.
Galvanized Iron tubular steel is used for main beams, intermediate beams, columns, slab and roof
frame. EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) panels with 50 mm thickness were used for walling.
According to Shong (2016) the essential factors of disaster shelters: functional, economic,
sustainable, safe, comfortable, social, healing, and aesthetic. ‘Functional’ means that the shelter
should not only be able to provide a safe environment that protects its residents from wind, cold,
heat, earthquakes, or water, but also be designed in a way that even the non-trained are able to
build it quickly and easily. ‘Economic’ refers to productioncosts and also providing options of
easily acquirable ingredients. ‘Sustainable’ speaks of both recycling the shelter as a whole, and
also processing its deconstructed remnants in an ecofriendly manner. As the shelter structure
itself being safe the obvious premise, ‘safe’ requires the shelter to be a space that is safe from
crime and also a space that provides psychological safety. ‘Comfortable’ was selected as an
essential element in regards to the necessities of housing. ‘Social’ refers to the social, cultural,
and religious requirements of a shelter. ‘Healing’ was chosen because there is a need for study in
regards to the shelter environment serving as a means of healing the psychological anxiety and
wounds, given that the shelter sits within a catastrophe. ‘Aesthetic’ seeks to link the image or
sentiment presented by the form to the human aesthetic instinct, leading the influence of
recognition and healing to be discovered within the environment that the shelter is place in.
Temporary shelters should continue to use even if there is no disaster to avoid being stock and
deteriorates. By continuous use of the structure during and after any disaster will make it
worthwhile of all the money spent to it.
Based on study by Haider and Ahmed (2014) cyclones shelters provide an immediate and
temporary shelter to disaster affected people. The shelters serve as sanctuaries for the local
community and their livestock when any disaster hits. Some of the cyclone shelters in the
southwest coastal region of Bangladesh are now in dire condition due to lack of maintenance and
management. Field visits and literature survey find that the roof is cracked and the doors and
windows are stolen or broken in some shelters of the region. As a result, those shelter fail to meet
the ultimate objective – providing shelter to disaster affected people during and after disaster. A
financial support is needed for maintenance of those shelters which questions the sustainability
of the establishments. Moreover, the miserable economic condition of the people living in the
shelter catchment areas hinders any voluntary financial contribution for shelter management or
sustainability. Upazila Disaster Management Committee (UDMC) has the responsibility to
execute repair and maintenance works of a cyclone shelter in the concerned Upazila. However,
since the UDMC does not get adequate financial support from the authorized ministry, they often
fail to take immediate steps for shelter sustainability through smooth pair and maintenance works.
The development and implementation of a sustainable plan is essential for smooth functioning
and ensuring proper maintenance and management of cyclone shelters. Recognizing this reality,
an attempt is made to explore multipurpose uses of cyclone shelters, through which the shelters
might be able to generate fund for maintenance and smooth functioning. Study tries to identify
the products/services and markets around a cyclone shelter with the aim of developing a stable
financial plan for ensuring proper maintenance and management of the shelter, which might help
to keep the shelter usable and effective during and after any disaster.
Though the community owned multipurpose cyclone shelters are specially for cyclone refugee,
those are also place where people may meet and develop new ways for generating income. Some
cyclone shelters are used as educational institutions round the year except the disaster time.
However, some other remain idle during normal periods. CEGIS finds from a field investigation
that among 2,583 cyclone shelters in Bangladesh, 82 percent are used as educational centers, 8
percent as offices, 1 percent as community centers, 1 percent as health centers and 6 percent do
not have any normal time use. Therefore, a plan for utilizing the shelters in multipurpose uses
might ensure the utilization of idle capacity.
Modular houses are prefabricated houses that consist of separate modules that can be rearranged,
replaced, or interchanged easily. It is constructed with standardized units or dimensions for
flexibility and variety in use. The parts/sections are delivered from the building site to the
intended site. Then the installation of prefabricated sections is completed on site. The modules
can be placed side-by-side, end-to-end, or stacked, allowing a variety of configurations and styles.
After placement the modules are joined together using inter-module connections, also known as
inter-connections. The inter-connections tie the individual modules together to form the overall
building structure.
The use of pre-fabrication in the housing industry goes back over one-hundred years. It started
gaining popularity early in the 20th century. Housing demand at the end of World War II caused
the modular market to truly explode and to greatly evolve. All of the soldiers returning to
America were looking to buy a home and start a family. The demand for homes was greater than
the market place could handle with the traditional “stick built” construction process. This
shortage led builders to look for solutions to increase efficiency and lower the cost of new home
construction. The modular building process answered both of these needs. These early modular
homes were much simpler in design than today’s modular buildings. In the last twenty years,
sophistication of modular homebuilding methods has greatly increased with the advent of
computer aided architectural modeling and the pioneering engineering process of assembling
homes with the overhead cranes that have a capacity to easily lift 100+ tons. This allows for
larger modules to be constructed and shipped cross-country. The only size and design limitations
for modular construction are the practical size limits placed on each individual module due to the
width and underpass clearance of the road from the factory to the building site. (Cameron and Di
Carlo, 2007)
The Philippines, due to its archipelagic and geographic location is naturally vulnerable to various
forms of geological and meteorological disasters. An average of 20 to 22 typhoons hit the
country annually causing floods and massive destruction to properties. In November 2013, series
of disaster hit the country which resulted to massive displacement of families due to devastation.
One example of these is the Super Typhoon Yolanda with a maximum sustained winds of 315
kilo meters per hour made four landfalls in the country affecting Regions V, VI, VII, VIII, X, XI,
MIMAROPA, CALABARZON, and CARAGA. Total number of affected families within the 50
kilometer radius path of Yolanda reached 1,472,251 leaving 493,912 families with partially
damaged houses and 518,878 families with totally damaged houses. In previous disasters
wherein so many families left homeless, the government constructed bunkhouses and even
distributed shelter kits. This is protect the vulnerable families from the harmful effects of the
debris of devastation.
A range of possible alternative temporary shelter solutions that takes into account varying
timeframes of occupancy, availability and configuration of space, as well as deployment
conditions were developed resulting from these participatory
engagements.(GeomilieTumamaoGuittapet al ,2019)
Through this reference the researcher came up with the idea to design and build economical,
strong and wind resistance structure that can be used not only as temporary shelter for vulnerable
people at times of disaster but can be also used as mini office and outdoor shelter at normal
condition.
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
Method of Research
The researchers used developmental method of research in this study. This type of
research is defined as the systematic study of designing, developing, and evaluating instructional
programs, processes, and products that must meet the criteria of internal consistency and
effectiveness.
Research Design Criteria
This includes all the codes, standards, criteria, and practices that were generally used in the
design and construction of structural engineering systems for the project.
A. Design loads
Loads that are used for designing the structure and foundations were based in the
National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 2015 requirements. These
requirements are the maximum capacity that a system is designed to handle the maximum
amount of something that the system can produce.
a) Dead Load
Dead load includes the loads from the structural elements, the supported
structure, and permanent attachments or accessories.
b) Live Load
This comprises the weight of the occupants, and small requirement or
movable objects such as furniture.
c) Wind Load
The wind was calculated according to the National Structural Code of the
Philippines 2015 with a basic wind speed of 250 kph and exposure category “B”.
d) Earthquake Load
Structures and portions shall be designed and constructed to resist the effects
of seismic ground motions as provided by the National Structure Code of the
Philippines 2015 Section 208.
B. Design Bases
The Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Method was used to design the
steel structures, with the aid of National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015,
AISC Specifications and a design software application STAAD.
a) Allowable stresses
The allowable stress or allowable strength is the maximum stress (tensile,
compressive, or bending) that can be applied on a structural material. The
allowable stresses are generally defined by building codes, and for steel is a
fraction of yield stress (strength).
b) Load Factors and Load Combination
The load factors and load combination of the steel-framed structures are based
on the Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) method.
C. Design Specifications
This section described the principles and strategies used as guidelines in designing the
project including the characteristics of the project and its different parts.
a) Size and Dimension
The shelter has a projected height of 2.60 meters from the base support to the
highest point of the roof, the lower part of the structure is 1.20 meter from the
floor slab and the upper part is an arc with a radius of 1.20 meters and an arc
length of 3.77 meters. The clear height inside the structure is 2.4 meters and has a
length of 3.2 meters when fabricated.
b) Floor Plan
The flooring has an area of 7.68 square meters with a dimension of 2.4 meters
by 3.2 meters. It is divided into smaller squares with dimensions of 0.80 meter by
0.80 meter and the squares are connected by pin support on a manner that it can
be folded as a box.
c) Framing System
Four stainless steel pipes with cross-section of 3inØ at the lower portion and
2inØ at the upper portion were used for the frame and each of the pipe frames can
be disassembled. Braced of the structures are provided by steel rods with stoppers
at both ends using bolts and nuts.
d) Walling System
The walling system consists of sawali, marine plywood, and galvanized iron
sheets that will be divided into series of panels.
e) Ventilation
Doors and window were provided for ventilation. For better air circulation,
sawali panels were installed on the sides of the structure.
g) Base Supports
The 0.8 meter by 0.8 meter squares on the floor are all supported by tubular
steels on its perimeters. The base support is 0.20 meter in height.

h) Aesthetic
The house was carefully constructed to make a multipurpose shelter.
Galvanized iron sheet painted blue was used due to the availability of the product.
Sawali and marine plywood was used for the exterior walls, doors and windows.
From base plates up to the roof, bolt connection, welds and materials finishes
were checked and designed carefully.
Selection of Materials
Materials selection in an ordered process by which engineers can systematically and rapidly
eliminate materials and identify the one or a small number of materials which are the most
suitable. Its main goal is to minimize cost while meeting performance goals.
A. Floor System
a) Phenolic plywood
Phenolic plywood, amongst the various types of plywood available, is one of
the toughest and most stable. The phenolic surface resists cracking and splitting
from fasteners extremely well. At the same time, it provides a higher resistance to
screw pull-out than you find with uncoated plywood. Since the phenolic surface is
extremely smooth, it is extremely low friction, making it an ideal surface where
other wood pieces would need to slide over it.
B. Frame System
a) Steel tubes
Steel is a highly durable metal as it can withstand a considerable amount of
external pressure. It is also a tensile metal with a high strength to weight ratio
which means it has high strength per unit mass. So no matter how large the
overall structure is, the steel sections will be small and lightweight
b) Base support
The Base support consists of tubular steels all with 6.35millimeter thickness
welded to carry the square floor panels.
C. Walling and Roof
a) Galvanized Iron Sheet
Galvanized Iron provides long life expectancy and reliability with outstanding
resistance to mechanical damage. Coating life and performance are dependable as
it also offers superior resistance to abrasion and water.
b) Sawali
Sawali is a product that allows air to pass through it while keeping out
unwanted elements such as water, dirt, and debris. It is also a Filipino local
product and is inexpensive because its raw materials are found in rural areas where
lower income households abound.
D. Doors and Windows

Doors and windows used in the structure are customized with the use of
plywood and framed it with angle bars and flat bars for lesser expenses.
E. Connection and Supports
The connection used for the frames were bolts and nut.
Structural System
In building construction, the particular method of assembling and constructing structural
elements of a building so that they support and transmit applied loads safely to the ground
without exceeding the allowable stresses in the members
Structural Loads
Forces applied to a structure or its parts are called structural loads. This causes structural stress,
deformation, and displacement. Overloading can cause structural failure and should therefore be
considered either in the design or strictly controlled.
Structural analysis
Structural analysis is a comprehensive evaluation to ensure that structural deformations are
sufficiently lower than the permissible limits, and structural failure will not occur. The objective
of structural analysis is to design a structure with the proper strength, stiffness and safety.
Deformation is a structure can be either fully recoverable elastic or inelastic.
a) Analysis Due to Wind Load

The design analysis for wind loads of the fabricated model was based from the wind
shear affecting the model and was designed to resist a strong wind up to 250 kph according to
National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015.
b) Analysis of base supports
The design analysis of the supports was designed based on the combination of loads such
as live loads, dead load, and wind load. Computation of dead loads and live loads were
computed on the chapter 4.
c) Analysis of Base Supports
The length and thickness of base plate supports were designed to resist the axial loads
composed of dead loads, live loads, and wind load as well as to resist the moment applied by
the loads.
d) Analysis Due to Earthquake Load
The design structure considers Zone IV as the seismic zoning and Standard Occupancy
Structure for the occupancy.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
HOUSE CONCEPT DESIGN

(Designing the Dimensions and aesthetics)
ESTABLISH DESIGN CRITERIA

(Design Loads and Specification)
SELECTION OF MATERIALS
(Walling system, Flooring, Doors and Windows, Insulation)
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
(Analysis of Frames and Supports)
FABRICATION PROCESS
ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY PROCESS

CHAPTER 4
ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION OF DATA
The purpose of the study is to design a detachable cylindrical modular shelter which is designed
to withstand loads in accordance with the National Structural Codes of the Philippines. The
analysis of this study is in reference to National Structural Codes of the Philippines 2015.
ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE DUE TO WIND LOAD
For enclosed and partially enclosed rigid buildings.
Design of wind pressure on C&C (Component & Cladding) elements of low rise
buildings with h ≤ 18m
207E.4-1
Determining risk category
o Table 103-1
OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY OR FUNCTION OF THE

CATEGORY STRUCTURE
IV. Standard All structures housing occupancies or having

Occupancy function not listed in Category I,
Structure II or III and Category V
Determining the basic wind speed, V
o V = 250 kph≈ 69.4444 m/s Figure 207A.5-1A

Determining wind load parameters:
o Wind Directionality Factor, kd
 Table 207A.6-1
Structure Type Directionality Factor kd
Components and Cladding 0.85
oExposure Category
 Exposure B Section 207A.7
o Topographic Factor, kzt
 Since site conditions and locations of structures do not meet all
the conditions specified in Section 207A.8.1 then
kzt= 1.0 Section 207A.8.2
o Internal Pressure Coefficient, (𝑮𝑪𝒑𝒊)
Table 207A.11-1
Enclosure Classification (𝑮𝑪𝒑𝒊)
+0.18
Enclosed Buildings
-0.18
Determining velocity pressure exposure coefficient, Kz
o Table 207E.3-1
Height above ground level, z Exposure B

(m)
0 - 4.5 0.70
Determining velocity pressure, qh
o𝒒𝒉 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟏𝟑𝒌𝒛𝒌𝒛𝒕𝒌𝒅𝑽𝟐 207E.3-1
 𝒒𝒉 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟏𝟑(𝟎. 𝟕𝟎)(𝟏. 𝟎)(𝟎. 𝟖𝟓)(𝟔𝟗. 𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒)𝟐
Determining external pressure coefficient, (𝑪𝒑)
o Arched roofs, from Figure 207B.4-3
 Windward quarter – (2.75r – 0.7)
 Center half – (-0.7 – r)
 Leeward quarter – (-0.5)
• Where: 𝑟 = ℎ⁄𝐿 = 1.8⁄3.2 = 0.56

Solving for Pressures
𝒑 = 𝒒𝒉[(𝑮𝑪𝒑) − (𝑮𝑪𝒑𝒊)]
CASE I: GCpi+0.18
Windward Quarter
Center Half
Leeward Quarter
CASE I: GCpi-0.18
Windward Quarter
Center Half
Leeward Quarter
Governing Pressure:
A WINDWARD
B CENTER
C LEEWARD
Note: these values are encoded inStaad for further computation

STAAD SPACE
PAGE NO. 1
****************************************************
* *
* STAAD.Pro V8i SELECTseries6 *
* Version 20.07.11.33 *
* Proprietary Program of *
* Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* Date= DEC 8, 2020 *
* Time= 14: 9: 0 *
* *
* USER ID: *
****************************************************
1. STAAD SPACE
INPUT FILE: C:\Users\Sarena\Desktop\modular house\rere\Modular House.STD
2. START JOB INFORMATION

3. ENGINEER DATE 30-NOV-20
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT METER KN
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 0.8 0 0; 3 1.6 0 0; 4 2.4 0 0; 5 0 0 -0.8; 6 0.8 0 -0.8
9. 7 1.6 0 -0.8; 8 2.4 0 -0.8; 9 0 0 -1.6; 10 0.8 0 -1.6; 11 1.6 0 -1.6
10. 12 2.4 0 -1.6; 13 0 0 -2.4; 14 0.8 0 -2.4; 15 1.6 0 -2.4; 16 2.4 0 -2.4
11. 17 0 0 -3.2; 18 0.8 0 -3.2; 19 1.6 0 -3.2; 20 2.4 0 -3.2; 21 0 -0.2 0
12. 22 2.4 -0.2 0; 23 0 -0.2 -1.6; 24 2.4 -0.2 -1.6; 25 0 -0.2 -3.2
13. 26 2.4 -0.2 -3.2; 27 0 1.2 0; 28 2.4 1.2 0; 29 0 1.2 -0.8; 30 2.4 1.2 -0.8
14. 31 0 1.2 -2.4; 32 2.4 1.2 -2.4; 33 0 1.2 -3.2; 34 2.4 1.2 -3.2
15. 35 0.0913 1.659 0; 36 0.0913 1.6592 -0.8; 37 0.0913 1.659 -2.4
16. 38 0.0913 1.659 -3.2; 39 2.3087 1.659 0; 40 2.3087 1.659 -0.8
17. 41 2.3087 1.659 -2.4; 42 2.309 1.659 -3.2; 43 0.3515 2.049 0
18. 44 0.3515 2.0485 -0.8; 45 0.3515 2.0485 -2.4; 46 0.3515 2.0485 -3.2
19. 47 2.049 2.0485 0; 48 2.0485 2.0485 -0.8; 49 2.049 2.0485 -2.4
20. 50 2.0485 2.0485 -3.2; 51 0.7408 2.309 0; 52 0.7408 2.3087 -0.8
21. 53 0.7408 2.3087 -2.4; 54 0.7408 2.3087 -3.2; 55 1.6592 2.309 0
22. 56 1.6592 2.3087 -0.8; 57 1.6592 2.309 -2.4; 58 1.659 2.3087 -3.2
23. 59 1.2 2.4 0; 60 1.2 2.4 -0.8; 61 1.2 2.4 -2.4; 62 1.2 2.4 -3.2
24. MEMBER INCIDENCES
25. 1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 3 4; 4 5 6; 5 6 7; 6 7 8; 7 9 10; 8 10 11; 9 11 12; 10 13 14
26. 11 14 15; 12 15 16; 13 17 18; 14 18 19; 15 19 20; 16 1 5; 17 5 9; 18 9 13 27. 19 13 17; 20 2
6; 21 6 10; 22 10 14; 23 14 18; 24 3 7; 25 7 11; 26 11 15
28. 27 15 19; 28 4 8; 29 8 12; 30 12 16; 31 16 20; 32 21 1; 33 23 9; 34 25 17
29. 35 22 4; 36 24 12; 37 26 20; 38 1 27; 39 4 28; 40 5 29; 41 13 31; 42 17 33
30. 43 8 30; 44 16 32; 45 20 34; 46 27 29; 47 29 31; 48 31 33; 49 28 30; 50 30 32
31. 51 32 34; 52 33 38; 53 31 37; 54 29 36; 55 27 35; 56 34 42; 57 32 41; 58 30 40 32. 59 28
39; 60 38 37; 61 37 36; 62 36 35; 63 42 41; 64 41 40; 65 40 39; 66 35 43 33. 67 36 44; 68
37 45; 69 38 46; 70 39 47; 71 40 48; 72 41 49; 73 42 50; 74 43 44 34. 75 44 45; 76 45 46;
77 47 48; 78 48 49; 79 49 50; 80 43 51; 81 44 52; 82 45 53 35. 83 46 54; 84 50 58; 85 49
57; 86 48 56; 87 47 55; 88 58 57; 89 57 56; 90 56 55
36. 91 54 53; 92 53 52; 93 52 51; 94 51 59; 95 52 60; 96 53 61; 97 54 62; 98 55 59
37. 99 56 60; 100 57 61; 101 58 62; 102 59 60; 103 60 61; 104 61 62 38. START
GROUP DEFINITION
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 2
39. FLOOR
40. _F1 1 TO 31
41. _R1 16 TO 19 38 40 TO 42 46 TO 48
42. _R2 46 TO 48 52 TO 55 60 TO 62 43. _R3 60 TO 62 66 TO 69 74 TO 76
44. _R4 74 TO 76 80 TO 83 91 TO 93
45. _R5 91 TO 97 102 TO 104
46. _R6 88 TO 90 98 TO 104
47. _R7 77 TO 79 84 TO 90
48. _R8 63 TO 65 70 TO 73 77 TO 79
49. _R9 49 TO 51 56 TO 59 63 TO 65
50. _R10 28 TO 31 39 43 TO 45 49 TO 51
51. JOINT
52. GEOMETRY
53. END GROUP DEFINITION
54. DEFINE MATERIAL START
55. ISOTROPIC STEEL
56. E 2.05E+008
57. POISSON 0.3
58. DENSITY 76.8195
59. ALPHA 1.2E-005
60. DAMP 0.03
61. TYPE STEEL
62. STRENGTH FY 253200 FU 407800 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
63. ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
64. E 2.17185E+007
65. POISSON 0.17
66. DENSITY 23.5616
67. ALPHA 1E-005
68. DAMP 0.05
69. TYPE CONCRETE
70. STRENGTH FCU 27579
71. END DEFINE MATERIAL
72. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
73. 1 TO 37 TABLE ST TUB30203
74. 38 TO 45 TABLE ST PIPX25
75. 52 TO 59 66 TO 73 80 TO 87 94 TO 101 TABLE ST PIPX15
76. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
77. 46 TO 51 60 TO 65 74 TO 79 88 TO 93 102 TO 104 PRIS YD 0.01
78. CONSTANTS
79. MATERIAL STEEL ALL
80. SUPPORTS
81. 21 TO 26 PINNED
82. DEFINE REFERENCE LOADS
83. LOAD R1 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE REF 1
84. SELFWEIGHT Y -1 LIST ALL
85. FLOOR LOAD
86. _F1 FLOAD 0.9512 GY
87. END DEFINE REFERENCE LOADS
88. DEFINE UBC LOAD
89. ZONE 0.4 I 1 RWX 8.5 RWZ 8.5 STYP 4 CT 0.0448 NA 1 NV 1
90. SELFWEIGHT 1
91. LOAD 1 LOADTYPE SEISMIC TITLE EX 92. UBC LOAD X 1 DEC 1 ACC 0.05
93. PERFORM ANALYSIS
PROBLEM STATISTICS
-----------------------------------
NUMBER OF JOINTS 62 NUMBER OF MEMBERS 104

NUMBER OF PLATES 0 NUMBER OF SOLIDS 0
NUMBER OF SURFACES 0 NUMBER OF SUPPORTS 6
SOLVER USED IS THE OUT-OF-CORE BASIC SOLVER
ORIGINAL/FINAL BAND-WIDTH= 26/ 10/ 66 DOF

TOTAL PRIMARY LOAD CASES = 1, TOTAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM = 354
TOTAL LOAD COMBINATION CASES = 0 SO FAR.
SIZE OF STIFFNESS MATRIX = 24 DOUBLE KILO-WORDS
REQRD/AVAIL. DISK SPACE = 12.4/ 218942.8 MB
**WARNING- NO RIGID FLOOR DIAPHRAGM IS PRESENT IN THE MODEL.

DEC AND ACC FACTORS FACTOR ARE IGNORED.
***********************************************************
* *
* X DIRECTION : Ta = 0.092 Tb = 0.081 Tuser = 0.000 *
* T = 0.081, LOAD FACTOR = 1.000 *
* UBC TYPE = 97 *
* UBC FACTOR V = 0.1294 x 3.61 = 0.47 KN *
* *
***********************************************************
94. CHANGE
95. LOAD 2 LOADTYPE SEISMIC TITLE EZ
96. UBC LOAD Z 1 DEC 1 ACC 0.05
**WARNING- NO RIGID FLOOR DIAPHRAGM IS PRESENT IN THE MODEL.
DEC AND ACC FACTORS FACTOR ARE IGNORED.
***********************************************************
* *
* Z DIRECTION : Ta = 0.092 Tb = 0.107 Tuser = 0.000 *
* T = 0.107, LOAD FACTOR = 1.000 *
* UBC TYPE = 97 *
* UBC FACTOR V = 0.1294 x 3.61 = 0.47 KN *
* *
***********************************************************
98. CHANGE
99. LOAD 3 LOADTYPE DEAD TITLE DL
100. REFERENCE LOAD
101. R1 -1.0
102. LOAD 4 LOADTYPE LIVE TITLE LL
103. FLOOR LOAD
104. _F1 FLOAD -2.4 GY
**NOTE** about Floor/OneWay Loads/Weights.
Please note that depending on the shape of the floor you may have to
break up the FLOOR/ONEWAY LOAD into multiple commands. For
details please refer to Technical Reference Manual Section 5.32.4.2 Note
d and/or "5.32.4.3 Note f.
105. LOAD 5 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE WL

106. MEMBER LOAD
107. 52 TO 55 66 TO 69 UNI Y -2.52 108. 56 TO 59 70 TO 73 UNI Y 1.67
109. 80 TO 87 94 TO 101 UNI Y 3.52
110. LOAD COMB 6 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 6 111. 3 1.4
112. LOAD COMB 7 COMBINATION LOAD CASE
7 113. 3 1.2 4 1.6

8 115. 3 1.42 4 0.5 2 1.25
116. LOAD COMB 9 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 9

117. 3 1.42 4 0.5 1 1.25
118. LOAD COMB 10 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 10 119. 3 1.42 4 0.5 2 -1.25
11 121. 3 1.42 4 0.5 1 -1.25

12 123. 3 1.42 1 1.25

13 125. 3 1.42 2 1.25

14 127. 3 1.42 1 -1.25

15 129. 3 1.42 2 -1.25

16 131. 3 0.68 1 1.25

133. 3 0.68 2 1.25

134. LOAD COMB 18 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 18 135. 3 0.68 2 -1.25
19 137. 3 0.68 1 -1.25

20 139. 3 1.2 5 0.5

21 141. 3 1.2 5 1.0

22 143. 3 1.2 4 1.6 5 0.5

23 145. 3 0.9 5 1.0

24 147. 3 0.9 5 1.0 4 1.0 1 0.5

25 149. 3 0.9 5 1.0

26 151. 3 1.2 5 -0.5

27 153. 3 1.2 5 -1.0

155. 3 0.9 5 -1.0
157. PARAMETER 1
158. CODE AISC UNIFIED 2010
159. CHECK CODE MEMB 1 TO 45 52 TO 59 66 TO 73 80 TO 87 94 TO 101
STAAD.PRO CODE CHECKING - (AISC-360-10-LRFD) v1.4a

********************************************
ALL UNITS ARE - KN METE (UNLESS OTHERWISE Noted)
MEMBER TABLE RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/

FX MY MZ LOCATION
===========================================================
============
1 ST TUB30203 (AISC SECTIONS)
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.497 27
6.95 T 0.00 2.77 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.277 24
12.07 C 0.01 -1.44 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.597 24
12.14 C 0.03 3.28 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.547 27
2.10 T -0.19 2.87 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.271 24
1.30 C 0.13 -1.38 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.383 24

0.33 C -0.19 1.95 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.411 7
12.00 C 0.00 2.21 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.293 22
13.57 C 0.00 -1.51 0.20
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.534 22
14.52 C -0.00 2.89 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.547 27
2.10 T 0.19 2.87 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.271 24
1.30 C -0.13 -1.38 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.383 24
0.33 C 0.19 1.95 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.497 27
6.95 T -0.00 2.76 0.00

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.277 24
12.07 C -0.01 -1.44 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.596 24
12.14 C -0.03 3.27 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.205 27
2.71 C 0.08 -1.08 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.301 27
3.17 C -0.34 1.23 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.301 27
3.17 C -0.34 1.23 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.205 27
2.71 C 0.08 -1.08 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.076 22
0.03 C -0.01 -0.43 0.67

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.164 24
0.09 C 0.36 0.47 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.164 24
0.09 C 0.36 0.47 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.076 22
0.03 C -0.01 -0.43 0.13
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.088 22
0.07 C -0.03 -0.46 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.124 24
0.02 T -0.34 -0.26 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.124 24
0.02 T -0.34 -0.26 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.088 22
0.07 C -0.03 -0.46 0.00

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.098 7
1.96 C -0.03 -0.52 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.159 27
0.61 C -0.35 0.44 0.80
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.159 27
0.61 C -0.35 0.44 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.098 7
1.96 C -0.03 -0.52 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.380 24
4.60 T 0.26 1.79 0.20
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.445 7
9.31 C 0.00 2.44 0.20
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.380 24
4.60 T -0.26 1.79 0.20

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.476 24
1.21 C -0.13 -2.57 0.20
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.560 22
9.09 C 0.00 -3.11 0.20
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.476 24
1.21 C 0.13 -2.57 0.20
38 ST PIPX25 (AISC SECTIONS)
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.738 5
2.75 T -0.19 3.48 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.228 24
3.09 T 0.05 1.06 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.669 27
2.48 C -0.03 -3.32 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.669 27
2.48 C 0.03 -3.32 0.00

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.737 5
2.75 T 0.19 3.48 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.314 24
3.10 T 0.01 1.53 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.314 24
3.10 T -0.01 1.53 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.227 24
3.09 T -0.05 1.06 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.731 24
3.36 T -0.00 -1.10 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.764 24
3.31 T -0.01 -1.15 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.765 24
3.31 T 0.01 -1.15 0.47

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.731 24
3.36 T 0.00 -1.10 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.307 24
2.84 T -0.01 -0.45 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.426 24
2.81 T -0.01 -0.63 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.427 24
2.81 T 0.01 -0.63 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.307 24
2.84 T 0.01 -0.45 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.732 24
3.59 T -0.00 -1.10 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.765 24
3.47 T 0.01 -1.15 0.00

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.765 24
3.47 T -0.01 -1.15 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.732 24
3.59 T 0.00 -1.10 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.226 24
2.48 T -0.00 0.33 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.229 24
2.37 T -0.00 0.34 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.229 24
2.37 T 0.00 0.33 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.226 24
2.48 T 0.00 0.33 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.517 24
2.80 T 0.00 -0.78 0.00

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.501 24
2.63 T 0.00 -0.75 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.501 24
2.63 T -0.00 -0.75 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.517 24
2.81 T -0.00 -0.78 0.00
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.422 24
2.06 T 0.00 0.63 0.43
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.459 24
1.89 T 0.00 0.69 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.459 24
1.89 T -0.00 0.69 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.422 24
2.06 T -0.00 0.63 0.43

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.352 24
2.23 T 0.00 0.53 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.405 24
2.04 T 0.00 0.61 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.406 24
2.04 T -0.00 0.61 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.352 24
2.24 T -0.00 0.52 0.47
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.452 24
1.98 T -0.00 0.68 0.16
PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.497 24
1.78 T -0.00 0.75 0.20

PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.496 24
1.78 T 0.00 0.75 0.20


PASS Eq. H1-1b 0.452 24
1.98 T 0.00 0.68 0.16
160. PARAMETER 2
161. CODE AISC UNIFIED 2010
162. STEEL MEMBER TAKE OFF LIST 1 TO 45 52 TO 59 66 TO 73 80 TO 87 94 TO 101
STEEL TAKE-OFF
--------------
PROFILE LENGTH(METE) WEIGHT(KN )
ST TUB30203 26.00 2.113
ST PIPX25 9.60 0.766
ST PIPX15 14.98 0.556
----------------
TOTAL = 3.435
MEMBER PROFILE LENGTH WEIGHT

(METE) (KN )
1 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065

2 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
3 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
4 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
5 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
6 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
7 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
8 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
9 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
10 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
11 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
12 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
13 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
14 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
15 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
16 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
17 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
18 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
19 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
20 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
21 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
22 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
23 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
24 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
25 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
26 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
27 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
28 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
29 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
30 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
31 ST TUB30203 0.80 0.065
32 ST TUB30203 0.20 0.016
33 ST TUB30203 0.20 0.016
34 ST TUB30203 0.20 0.016
35 ST TUB30203 0.20 0.016
36 ST TUB30203 0.20 0.016
37 ST TUB30203 0.20 0.016
38 ST PIPX25 1.20 0.096
39 ST PIPX25 1.20 0.096

40 ST PIPX25 1.20 0.096
41 ST PIPX25 1.20 0.096
42 ST PIPX25 1.20 0.096
43 ST PIPX25 1.20 0.096
44 ST PIPX25 1.20 0.096
45 ST PIPX25 1.20 0.096
52 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
53 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
54 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
55 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
56 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
57 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
58 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
59 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
66 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
67 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
68 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
69 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
70 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
71 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
72 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
73 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
80 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
81 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
82 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
83 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
84 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
85 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
86 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
87 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
94 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
95 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
96 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
97 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
98 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
99 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
100 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
101 ST PIPX15 0.47 0.017
----------------
TOTAL = 3.435
************ END OF DATA FROM INTERNAL STORAGE ************
163. FINISH
*********** END OF THE STAAD.Pro RUN ***********
**** DATE= DEC 8,2020 TIME= 14: 9: 4 ****
************************************************************
For technical assistance on STAAD.Pro, please visit *

http://selectservices.bentley.com/en-US/ *
*
Details about additional assistance from *
Bentley and Partners can be found at program menu *
Help->Technical Support *
*
Copyright (c) 1997-2015 Bentley Systems, Inc.
http://www.bentley.com *
************************************************************
DEAD LOAD
Flooring – Phenolic/Gypsum Board (per mm thickness) – 0.008
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 0.008(3.2𝑚) (2.4𝑚) (15𝑚𝑚) = 0.9216𝑘𝑃𝑎
Roof boards – 0.10
Walling – Plywood (per mm thickness) – 0.006
Walling = 0.006{[2(3.2𝑚)(1.2𝑚)(0.0635𝑚𝑚)] +
𝜋(1.22 )
[2[((2.4m)(1.2m)+ )(0.0635)]]}= 0.0068𝑘𝑃a
2
LIVE LOAD
Use or Occupancy Uniform Load (KPa)
Category Description
Access Floor System Office Use 2.4
From Table 205-1

BASE PLATE COMPUTATION
Where: 𝐹𝑏 = 0.75𝐹𝑦 (Allowable Bending Stress)
Using A36 Steel, Fy = 248Mpa
𝐹𝑏 = 0.75(248) = 186𝑀𝑝𝑎
m = 38.1
n = 25.4
For q,
𝑃𝑢 = 1.2𝑃𝐷𝐿 + 1.6𝑃𝐿𝐿
= 1.2(1217 𝑁) + 1.6(4895 𝑁)
= 9292.4 𝑁
𝑃𝑢 9292.4 𝑁
𝑞= = = 0.600 𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝐴 (101.6𝑚𝑚)(152.4𝑚𝑚)
At shorter side:
3𝑞𝑛2 3(0.6)(25.4)2
𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = √ = √ = 2.50𝑚𝑚
𝐹𝑏 186
At longer side:
3𝑞𝑚2 3(0.6)(38.1)2
𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = √ = √ = 3.75𝑚𝑚 (𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑠)
𝐹𝑏 186
Use t = 3.75 mm ≈ 4mm

CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
This chapter is a summary of specifications required by the structural design and analysis
using the software application STAAD which is liable for the design and analysis of the structure.
Through this, the researchers come up with the following requirements needed for the structure:
1. A tubular pipe with an outside diameter of 3in is needed to be connected for
columns on the lower part of the structure to be sufficient enough to satisfy the design and for the
purpose of safety.
2. A tubular pipe with an outside diameter of 2in is needed to be connected for
columns on the upper part of the structure to be sufficient enough to satisfy the design and for the
purpose of safety.
3. A steel tube with a dimension of 2”x3” is provided for the mainframe of the slab
of the structure to carry the loads applied.
4. A steel tube with a dimension of 2”x3” is needed to be connected for the base
support that is welded to the mainframe of the slab to be adequate for the design.
Conclusion:
The researchers concluded that the multipurpose shelter built and assembled can
withstand the possible hazards like storms and earthquakes since it went through with various
design aspects and load analysis. The model was also constructed through implementation of the
required specifications by the design and analysis software used and the National Structural
Code of the Philippines. Therefore, the researchers ensured the safety and convenience of the
user of the built model.
Recommendations:
For the improvement of the study, the researchers recommend the following:
1. Consideration of Electrical and Plumbing Design.
2. Improvement on the system of assembling may be considered for further study.
3. The use of bamboo for flooring is recommended since the availability of the
material is abundant in different areas of the country and can also be considered
as a local product.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dr. Maziar Asefi, Faegeh Ahangar Sirus (2012) Transformable Shelter: Evaluation and New
Architectural Design. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812034088
Mohammed Ziaul Haider, Md. Firoz Ahmed (2014) Multipurpose Uses of Cyclone Shelters:
Quest for Shelter Sustainability and Community Development. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261371411_Multipurpose_Uses_of_Cyclo
ne_Shelters_Quest_for_Shelter_Sustainability_and_Community_Development
B. Shong (2016) Defining the architectural characteristics of multi-purpose shelters: drawing

issues through analysis of disaster shelters. Retrieved from
https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/SC16/SC16051FU1.pdf?fbclid=I
wAR1B6TCe3dCdLNltj4VdfRcdqJYyepdv5vxbWfFvpfymEwG0LSrJL22JbKQ
Peter Cameron Jr., Nadia D. Carlo (Sept. 2007) Piecing together modular: Understanding the
benefits and limitations of modular construction methods for multifamily
development. Retrieved from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4406618.pdf?fbclid=IwAR37rwkyPXZM14NbXUl
JkpBdi-qp8VYhUB1Yd1NOQDfF3Y-IvrlxZ2yxg2I
Geomilie Tumamao-Guittap (2019) Developing Alternative Temporary Shelter (ATS) Solutions

as Interim Coping Mechanism for the Displaced among Urban Poor Communities.
Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333340473_Developing_Alternative_Tem
porary_Shelter_ATS_Solutions_as_Interim_Coping_Mechanism_For_the_Displace
d_among_Urban_Poor_Communities?fbclid=IwAR2QvKEDrkPiQEAABRX_ofz7k
Sbe4BNFbW-VZl-S-1AkkY104KzSA7A8RDQ
APPENDIX
Design Consultation with Arch. Sico and Engr. Sico
Canvassing of Materials and Construction consultation

Construction Process
Assembling Process

Design and Construction of Assembled Multipurpose Shelter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design and Construction of Assembled Multipurpose Shelter

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design and Construction of Assembled Multipurpose Shelter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tarlac State University

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Design and Construction of Assembled

In Partial Fulfillment of the

mini office, outdoor shelter, and calamity victim temporary shelter.

will be modified in terms of materials, strength, and economy aspects.

happenings based on the following data gathered.

Disaster Assessment Report, the Municipality of Gerona is vulnerable to the hydro

temporary shelter for the victims is an urgent and critical task.

temporary shelters for the calamity victims.

proposed modular house.

SCOPE AND DELIMITATION

included in the design.

1. Modular buildings and modular homes areprefabricated buildingsorhousesthat consist

of repeated sections called modules.

3. Structural loads or actions areforces,deformations, oraccelerationsapplied

4. A frame is often a structural system that supports other components of a physical

construction and/or steel frame that limits the construction's extent.

5. Developmental research has been defined as the systematic study of designing,

meet criteria of internal consistency and effectiveness.

7. Structural analysis is the determination of the effects ofloadson physicalstructuresand

8. Fabrication is the process of making something from semi-finished or raw materials

rather than from ready-made components.

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

guide in planning and designing the project.

original homes are repaired or replaced.

mechanism to be used in different situations requires a great understanding of the geometric

stored in a short period of time.

conditions and also different functions.

architectural functionality of the interior space.

worthwhile of all the money spent to it.

sustainability. Upazila Disaster Management Committee (UDMC) has the responsibility to

might ensure the utilization of idle capacity.

replaced, or interchanged easily. It is constructed with standardized units or dimensions for

forms of geological and meteorological disasters. An average of 20 to 22 typhoons hit the

timeframes of occupancy, availability and configuration of space, as well as deployment

conditions were developed resulting from these participatory

RESEARCH APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

Research Design Criteria

design and construction of structural engineering systems for the project.

National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 2015 requirements. These

amount of something that the system can produce.

structure, and permanent attachments or accessories.

This comprises the weight of the occupants, and small requirement or

movable objects such as furniture.

of seismic ground motions as provided by the National Structure Code of the

Philippines 2015 Section 208.

AISC Specifications and a design software application STAAD.

compressive, or bending) that can be applied on a structural material. The

fraction of yield stress (strength).

b) Load Factors and Load Combination

on the Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) method.

a) Size and Dimension

length of 3.2 meters when fabricated.

at both ends using bolts and nuts.

sheets that will be divided into series of panels.

sawali panels were installed on the sides of the structure.

steels on its perimeters. The base support is 0.20 meter in height.

The house was carefully constructed to make a multipurpose shelter.