Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    Rubric For Assesing: Lab Report Type of Rubric: Holistic Subject: Science

    Uploaded by

    Leo Cordel Jr.
    The document is a rubric for assessing science lab reports with categories for the introduction, experimental hypothesis, materials, procedures, data, analysis, and conclusion sections. It provides descriptors to evaluate reports as exemplary, accomplished, developing, or beginning for items such as clearly stating the purpose and variables, describing materials accurately, listing procedures in logical steps, analyzing trends in the data, and including whether findings supported the hypothesis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric For Assesing: Lab Report Type of Rubric: Holistic Subject: Science

    Uploaded by

    Leo Cordel Jr.
    35 views2 pages
    The document is a rubric for assessing science lab reports with categories for the introduction, experimental hypothesis, materials, procedures, data, analysis, and conclusion sections. It provides descriptors to evaluate reports as exemplary, accomplished, developing, or beginning for items such as clearly stating the purpose and variables, describing materials accurately, listing procedures in logical steps, analyzing trends in the data, and including whether findings supported the hypothesis.

    Original Description:

    yu

    Original Title

    Lab_Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a rubric for assessing science lab reports with categories for the introduction, experimental hypothesis, materials, procedures, data, analysis, and conclusion sections. It provides descriptors to evaluate reports as exemplary, accomplished, developing, or beginning for items such as clearly stating the purpose and variables, describing materials accurately, listing procedures in logical steps, analyzing trends in the data, and including whether findings supported the hypothesis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    35 views2 pages

    Rubric For Assesing: Lab Report Type of Rubric: Holistic Subject: Science

    Uploaded by

    Leo Cordel Jr.
    The document is a rubric for assessing science lab reports with categories for the introduction, experimental hypothesis, materials, procedures, data, analysis, and conclusion sections. It provides descriptors to evaluate reports as exemplary, accomplished, developing, or beginning for items such as clearly stating the purpose and variables, describing materials accurately, listing procedures in logical steps, analyzing trends in the data, and including whether findings supported the hypothesis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Rubric for Assesing : Lab Report

    Type of Rubric : Holistic


    Subject : Science

    CATEGORY Exemplary (4) Accomplished (3) Developing (2) Beginning (1)


    Introduction Your introduction clearly Your introduction states Your introduction states There is no
    states the purpose of the lab the purpose of the lab the purpose of the lab, introduction.
    and you explicitly state the and the variables to be but not the variables
    variables that are to be studied. that will be studied.
    studied.

    Experimental Hypothesized relationship Hypothesized Hypothesized No hypothesis


    Hypothesis between the variables and relationship between the relationship between the has been stated.
    the predicted results is variables and the variables and the
    clear and reasonable based predicted results is predicted results has
    on what has been studied. reasonable based on been stated, but appears
    general knowledge and to be based on flawed
    observations. logic.
    Materials All materials and setup used Almost all materials and Most of the materials and Many materials
    in the experiment are clearly the setup used in the the setup used in the are described
    and accurately described. experiment are clearly experiment are inaccurately OR
    Drawings included as and accurately accurately described. are not described
    appropriate. described. at all.

    Procedures Procedures are listed in Procedures are listed in Procedures are listed Procedures do
    clear steps. Each step is a logical order, but steps but are not in a logical not accurately
    numbered and is a complete are not numbered and/or order or are difficult to list the steps of
    sentence. are not in complete follow. the
    sentences. experiment.

    Data Professional looking and Accurate representation Accurate representation Data are not
    accurate representation of of the data in tables of the data in written shown OR are
    the data in tables and/or and/or graphs. Graphs form, but no graphs or inaccurate.
    graphs. Graphs and tables and tables are labeled tables are presented.
    are labeled and titled. and titled. Drawings are
    Drawings are included as included when
    necessary and are well necessary.
    labeled.
    Analysis The relationship between the The relationship The relationship between The
    variables is discussed and between the variables is the variables is discussed relationship
    trends/patterns logically discussed and but no patterns, trends or between the
    analyzed. Predictions are trends/patterns logically predictions are made variables is not
    made about what might analyzed. based on the data. discussed.
    happen if part of the lab
    were changed or how the
    experimental design could
    be changed.
    Conclusion Conclusion includes Conclusion includes Conclusion includes No conclusion
    whether the findings whether the findings what was learned was included
    supported the hypothesis, supported the from the experiment. in the report
    possible sources of error, hypothesis and what OR shows little
    and what was learned from was learned from the effort and
    the experiment. experiment. reflection.

    You might also like